본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국 2009 개정 초등 과학과 교육과정과 미국 초등 과학과 교육과정 비교분석 - 3~4학년군 지구와 우주영역을 중심으로 -

A Comparative Study of Elementary Science Curriculum between Korea and USA - Focusing on Earth and Space Domain of Third and Fourth Grades -

김종영|신명경|김윤경
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)|2016.08|초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)|제35권 제3호|pp. 362-376|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.362

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

international comparisonTIMSSscience curriculumearth scienceNAEP
주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this paper was to analyze the characteristics of Korean science curriculum and the differences with the other country. For this purpose, the USA was selected as the target country for comparison. The comparison focused on goals and contents in science curriculum document. The goals for science education in both countries were similar. But the goal setting level was different. Also, four objectives were suggested in Korean curriculum and nine objectives in the USA to achieve the general objective. Korean curriculum was composed of such grades system as 3rd & 4th grades, 5th & 6th grades and content area as ‘materials and energy’, ‘life and the earth' in content system. And the USA composed in the such grade system as K, Grade 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Also the elements to be learned is suggested in the strand. And in the area of the earth and space in the Korean Curriculum, there are elements emphasized in the content area, cognitive area, context category and practical activities learning objective category. But the USA covered most of those elements evenly. Korean curriculum focused on learning of certain elements in certain grades, but the USA curriculum is to learn several elements evenly in every grade. It will be future topics of research to investigate the effect of curriculum with different emphasis of improving students' scientific knowledge and learning through further study.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to analyze the characteristics of Korean science curriculum and the differences with the other country. For this purpose, the USA was selected as the target country for comparison. The comparison focused on goals and contents in science curriculum document. The goals for science education in both countries were similar. But the goal setting level was different. Also, four objectives were suggested in Korean curriculum and nine objectives in the USA to achieve the general objective. Korean curriculum was composed of such grades system as 3rd & 4th grades, 5th & 6th grades and content area as ‘materials and energy’, ‘life and the earth' in content system. And the USA composed in the such grade system as K, Grade 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Also the elements to be learned is suggested in the strand. And in the area of the earth and space in the Korean Curriculum, there are elements emphasized in the content area, cognitive area, context category and practical activities learning objective category. But the USA covered most of those elements evenly. Korean curriculum focused on learning of certain elements in certain grades, but the USA curriculum is to learn several elements evenly in every grade. It will be future topics of research to investigate the effect of curriculum with different emphasis of improving students' scientific knowledge and learning through further study.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. American Academy for the Advancement of Science, "Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061" (1993), Oxford University Press
  2. The trends in international mathematics and science study: A technical report of the main survey in Korea, "Cho, J", Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation, ~ (2011)
  3. 최도성, "한국과 미국 초등학교 과학과 교육과정 및 교과서 비교 연구", 한국초등교육, 24(2), pp.151~166 (2013), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
  4. Jago, C, "A history of NAEP assessment frameworks" (2009), National Assessment Governing Board
  5. 장진주, "우리나라와 이스라엘의 중학교 과학과 교육과정 비교연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), pp.443~457 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
  6. 2011 NAEP-TIMSS linking study: Technical report on the linking methodologies and their evaluations, "Jia, Y", National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, ~, pp.NCES 2014-461 (2014)
  7. Kim, B, "A comparative study on science curriculum in Korea and Japan", Journal of Chungram Science Education, Science Education Research Institute Korea National University of Education, 17(1), pp.76~104 (2011)
  8. Kim, J, "TIMSS 2011 released items: Science" (2013), Korea Institute of Curriculum &Evaluation
  9. Trends in international mathematics and science study: Report of TIMSS 2011 results, "Kim, S", Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation, ~ (2013)
  10. Kim, E, "The analysis of national assessment of educational achievement items using three dimensional scientific assessment framework", Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 3(3), pp.248~256 (2010)
  11. Kind, P. M, "Conceptualizing the science curriculum:40 years of developing assessment frameworks in three large-scale assessments" (2013), Science Education
  12. 이소영, "우리나라 2009 개정 초등 과학교육과정과 핀란드 초등 과학교육과정 비교분석", 초등과학교육, 33(3), pp.491~509 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  13. Lee, S, "A study of analysis of science education curriculum Korea and USA: 7th Curriculum in Korean and NSES in USA", M.D, pp.2002
  14. Lee, S, "The analysis of the inquiry activities for the elementary science textbooks based on the revised 2007 curriculum: Focus on earth and space", M.D, pp.2013
  15. 이효녕, "과학과 교육과정에 제시된 개념의 연계성에 대한 국제 비교 연구 - 달과 암석의 순환 개념을 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(4), pp.677~689 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  16. 이미경, "우리나라, 미국, 영국, 일본, 싱가포르의 과학과 교육과정 비교", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1082~1193 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  17. Lim, B, "On enhancing science culture and evaluating scientific literacy: Focusing on PISA's projects", Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 1(1), pp.51~68 (2001)
  18. Martin, M. O, "TIMSS 2011 international results in science" (2012), Boston College
  19. Millar, R, "Analysing practical activities to assess and improve effectiveness: The practical activity analysis inventory (PAAI)" (2009), Centre for Innovation and Research in Science Education, University of York
  20. Millar, R, "Analysing practical science activities to assess and improve their effectiveness (getting practical)" (2010), Association for Science Education
  21. Ministry of Education, "Science curriculum according to the revised curriculum of 2009, announcement 2011-361 of Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Supplement 9", ~ (2011)
  22. Mullis, I. V. S, "TIMSS 2011 assessment framework" (2009), TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education
  23. The nation’s report card: Science 2009, "National Center for Education Statistics", Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, ~, pp.NCES 2011-451 (2011)
  24. The nation’s report card: Science 2011, "National Center for Education Statistics", Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, ~, pp.NCES 2012-465 (2012)
  25. U.S. States in a global context: Results from the 2011 NAEPTIMSS linking study, "National Center for Education Statistics", Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, ~, pp.NCES 2013-460 (2013)
  26. National Research Council, "Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning" (2000), National Academy Press
  27. National Research Council, "Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education" (2012), The National Academies Press
  28. 심규철, "초등 교과서에서 제시된 과학 탐구 활동의 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.24~31 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
  29. 신명경, "과학탐구의 핸즈온 활동 내용, 사고 활동 내용, 논리적 구조 측면에서의 초등 과학 교과서 분석 -지구와 우주 영역의 사례-", 교과교육학연구, 17(4), pp.1483~1499 (2013), 교과교육연구소
  30. Virginia Department of Education, "Virginia standards of learning assessments test blueprint grade 3 science 2010 science standards of learning" (2011), Virginia Department of Education
  31. Virginia Department of Education, "Virginia standards of learning assessments test blueprint grade 5 science 2010 science standards of learning" (2011), Virginia Department of Education
  32. Woo, J, "Classification and statement of evaluating objectives using three-dimensional assessment framework of science inquiry", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 16(3), pp.270~277 (1996)
  33. Wright, P. I, "Science standards of learning curriculum framework 2010 grade three" (2010), Virginia Department of Education
  34. Wright, P. I, "Science standards of learning curriculum framework 2010 grade four" (2010), Virginia Department of Education

관련 논문AI추천

한국과 미국의 초등 과학 교육과정 지구영역의 학년 간 내용 연계성 분석 연구서예원한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2008 · 제27권 제4호우리나라와 미국 초등 과학 교과서의 천문 영역 내용 비교 분석권계현, 박일우한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2010 · 제29권 제2호미국과 한국의 초등학교 과학 수업의 비교김효남, Do-Yong Park교과교육연구소 · 교과교육학연구2008 · 제12권 제1호2009 개정 과학과 교육과정의 지구과학(지권) 영역에 대한 종적 연계성 분석과 미국 차세대과학기준과의 비교이윤아, 이효녕사범대학부속중등교육연구소 · 중등교육연구2016 · 제64권 제3호우리나라 2009 개정 초등 과학교육과정과 핀란드 초등 과학교육과정 비교분석노석구, 이소영한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2014 · 제33권 제3호한국과 미국 초등학교 과학과 교육과정 및 교과서 비교 연구최도성초등교육연구원 · 한국초등교육2013 · 제24권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

나는 왜 그렇게 대처하였는가?: 초등 과학실험 수업 중 발생한 불일치 상황에서의 교사의 대처장진아, 박지선, 송진웅pp. 277-287초등과학 교육연구에서 시선추적 연구방법의 고찰신원섭pp. 288-3045E 과학학습과정 상의 기능을 중심으로 한 2009 개정 초등과학교과서 삽화 분석: 3~4학년 지구과학 단원을 대상으로임희준, 하지훈, 김종영pp. 305-315초등과학영재의 정서지능과 성취목표지향성이 진로성숙도에 미치는 영향임현지, 최선영pp. 316-325초등학생의 빛의 성질 개념에 대한 학습 발달과정의 개발이경란, 박종호, 백남권pp. 326-335
원문 보기