2009 개정 과학과 교육과정의 실행에 대한 초등학교 교사의 인식
Elementary School Teachers’ Recognition for the Implementation of 2009 Revised National Science Curriculum
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to analyze elementary school teachers’ implementation for the emphasis on the revision, major contents, teaching and learning method, and evaluation in the 2009 revised national science curriculum. To fulfill the purpose of this study we carried out a survey with 222 elementary school teachers. Main findings of this research were as follows: First, they highly agreed to the increase in class hours and the application of subject classroom, but they had a lower recognition for setting the subject groups. Second, the degree of necessity in discussion and STS was relatively high, but the degree of implementation in science writing, discussion and STEAM was low. Third, in teaching and learning method, they showed a high performance for mutual cooperation, student-led activities and communication, but, a low implementation for open inquiry and instruction considering individual differences. Fourth, in the evaluation of science learning, they showed a high implementation for evaluation based on achievement standards and one based on the understanding and application of basic concepts, but, a low implementation for the development of common evaluation tools. Fifth, it seemed that their recognition for amount, level and interest of science contents and inquiry activities was appropriate and positive.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze elementary school teachers’ implementation for the emphasis on the revision, major contents, teaching and learning method, and evaluation in the 2009 revised national science curriculum. To fulfill the purpose of this study we carried out a survey with 222 elementary school teachers. Main findings of this research were as follows: First, they highly agreed to the increase in class hours and the application of subject classroom, but they had a lower recognition for setting the subject groups. Second, the degree of necessity in discussion and STS was relatively high, but the degree of implementation in science writing, discussion and STEAM was low. Third, in teaching and learning method, they showed a high performance for mutual cooperation, student-led activities and communication, but, a low implementation for open inquiry and instruction considering individual differences. Fourth, in the evaluation of science learning, they showed a high implementation for evaluation based on achievement standards and one based on the understanding and application of basic concepts, but, a low implementation for the development of common evaluation tools. Fifth, it seemed that their recognition for amount, level and interest of science contents and inquiry activities was appropriate and positive.
참고문헌 (36)
- 계현아, "학교교육과정 편성·운영의 주체자로서의 교사의 전문성과 자율성에 관한 연구", 박사, 교육학, pp.2005
- , 2011
- 교육부, "2015개정 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호", ~ (2015)
- 권낙원, "교육과정 실행 수준 결정 요인 탐색", 교육과정연구, 24(3), pp.87~106 (2006), 한국교육과정학회
- PISA와 TIMSS 상위국과 우리나라의 교육과정및 성취특성 비교분석, "김경희", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRE 2009-7-2, 435-442 (2009)
- 김두정, "교육과정 개혁 : 연구 결과 및 한국의 과제", 교육학연구, 30(1), pp.167~181 (1992)
- 김은진, "과학 수행 평가 문항의 선정 및 제작을 위한 평가 준거의 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(1), pp.75~85 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- 초·중등학교 교육과정 선진화 개혁 방안 탐색, "박순경", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.2009-위탁-11 (2009)
- 제7차 교육과정의 성공적 정착을 위한 지원 요구 조사, "박순경", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.CRC 2001-5-1 (2001)
- 박재근, "2009개정 교육과정에서 과학과와 타교과의 성취기준 중복성에 대한 분석", 과학교육연구지, 38(2), pp.231~243 (2014), 과학교육연구소
- 학교 교육 경쟁력강화를 위한 교육과정 실행 방안 연구-과학과-, "심재호", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRC 2009-4-2 (2009)
- 심재호, "2007년 개정 과학과 교육과정의 주요 내용의 실행에 관한 과학 교사의 인식", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(1), pp.140~156 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
- 윤찬경, "과학학습에서 개념적 이해의 평가를 위한 문항 유형의 개발", 교과교육학연구, 10(2), pp.387~405 (2006)
- 이경진, "‘실행’을 중심으로 본 교육과정의 의미와 교사의 역할", 교육과정연구, 23(3), pp.57~80 (2005), 한국교육과정학회
- 이대용, "초등학교 교사의 교수역량 평가지표 개발 및 타당화", 교육평가연구, 25(4), pp.581~604 (2012), 한국교육평가학회
- 이명제, "과학 교육과정 개혁 연구의 쟁점들", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), pp.916~929 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 이양락, "제7차 중등학교 과학과 교육과정 내용의 적정성 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(7), pp.775~789 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 과학과 교육내용 적정성 분석 및 평가, "이양락", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRC 2004-1-6 (2004)
- 이윤미, "초등교사의 교육과정 실행 경험으로 본 교육과정 실행 관점과 의미", 교육과정연구, 33(4), pp.65~89 (2015), 한국교육과정학회
- 이효녕, "2009 개정 과학과 교육과정의 효과적인 실행을 위한 중학생들의 지구계에 대한 이해", 한국지구과학회지, 32(7), pp.798~808 (2011), 한국지구과학회
- 장지영, "과학 교육과정 개정에 따른 첨단과학기술 내용 분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 10(3), pp.389~406 (2010), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 교과군 도입 및 설정의 준거에 대한 타당성 분석 연구, "한국실과교육학회지", 2010, 399~428, pp.한국실과교육학회
- 최홍재, "제7차 중학교 과학 교육과정 실행여건 조사․분석", 한국생물교육학회지, 29(1), pp.65~77 (2001)
- 제7차 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 교육과정 실행 방안 연구, "홍후조", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRC 99-7-1 (1999)
- Danielson, C., "Enhancing professional practice; A framework for teaching" (1996), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
- Fullan, M., "The meaning of educational change" (1982), Teachers College Press
- Fullan, M., "Research on curriculum and instruction implementation", Review of Educational Research, 47(1), pp.335~397 (1977)
- Marsh, C. J., "Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues" (2003), Merrill Prentice Hall
- Ornstein, A. C., "Curriculum:foundation, principles and issues" (2004), Pearson Education
- Saylor, J. G., "Planning curriculum for schools" (1974), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Saylor, J. G., "Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning" (1981), Holt Rinehart & Winston
- Short, E. C., "Three levels of questions addressed in the field of curriculum research and practice", Journal of Curriculum Supervision, 9(1), pp.77~87 (1993)
- Stigler, J., "The teaching gap : Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom" (1999), The Free Press
- Synder, J., "Handbook of research curriculum", pp.402~435 (1992), Macmillan
- van Driel, J. H., "Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), pp.673~695 (1998)
- Wiles, J., "Curriculum development" (1989), Merill