초등학교 과학 협동 학습에서 소집단 구성을 달리한 효과
The Effects of Different Grouping in Elementary ScienceCooperative Learning
2
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to examined the effects of different grouping according to the levels of students' achievement in science cooperative learning on students' science academic achievements, science-related attitudes, perceptions of science learning environment and self-efficacies. The results of this study can be summarized as following. First, the homogeneous grouping was more effective than the heterogeneous grouping in improving the science academic achievements of high academic ability students. Second, the homogeneous grouping was more effective than the heterogeneous grouping in improving the science-related attitude of students, especially for low academic ability students. Third, both the homogeneous grouping and the heterogeneous grouping improved the perceptions of science learning environment of students. For low academic ability students, the homogeneous grouping was more effective. Fourth, the homogeneous grouping was more effective than the heterogeneous grouping in improving self-efficacies of students, especially for middle and low academic ability students.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examined the effects of different grouping according to the levels of students' achievement in science cooperative learning on students' science academic achievements, science-related attitudes, perceptions of science learning environment and self-efficacies. The results of this study can be summarized as following. First, the homogeneous grouping was more effective than the heterogeneous grouping in improving the science academic achievements of high academic ability students. Second, the homogeneous grouping was more effective than the heterogeneous grouping in improving the science-related attitude of students, especially for low academic ability students. Third, both the homogeneous grouping and the heterogeneous grouping improved the perceptions of science learning environment of students. For low academic ability students, the homogeneous grouping was more effective. Fourth, the homogeneous grouping was more effective than the heterogeneous grouping in improving self-efficacies of students, especially for middle and low academic ability students.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김현재, "열린 교실에서 과학교육의 협동 학습 전략", 한국초등과학교육학회지, 15(1), pp.1~28 (1999)
- 남철우, "교과교육과 초등 과학 교육론" (2000), 학문사
- 노태희, "협동 학습 전략에서 소집단 구성 방법의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 18(1), pp.61~70 (1998)
- 노태희, "협동 학습 전략의 교수 효과:중학교 물상수업에 LT 모델의 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 17(2), pp.139~148 (1997)
- 노태희, "협동 학습 전략의 교수 효과:고등학교 화학 수업에 STAD 모델의 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 17(3), pp.251~260 (1997)
- 노태희, "개념학습에 적용한 협동 학습 전략에서 소집단 구성 방법의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 19(3), pp.401~408 (1999)
- 양낙진, "협동 학습이 자아 존중감에 미치는 효과 연구", 박사, pp.1990
- 이양락, "협동 학습이 중학생의 과학지식,탐구능력 및 학습 환경 인식에 미치는 효과", 박사, pp.1997
- 이주연, "중학교 과학에서 소집단 구성을 달리한 협동 학습의 학습자의 수준에 따른 효과", 석사, pp.2002
- 임희준, "이질적으로 구성된 소집단 협동 학습에서의 언어적 상호 작용", 한국과학교육학회지, 21(4), pp.668~676 (2001)
- 정종진, "동기연구의 인지적 경향과 그 교육적 시사. -귀인이론(歸因理論)을 중심으로-", 교육심리연구, (10), pp.93~121 (1996)
- 채동현, "초등학교 자연과 내용에 대한 컴퓨터보조수업(CAI)이 과학성취도와 과학적 태도에 미치는 효과", 한국초등과학교육학회지, 16(2), pp.225~241 (1997)
- Aronson,E, "The Jigsaw classroom" (1978), Sage Pu-blication
- Cater, G, "Relationship between abi-lity paired interactions and the development of fifth gra-der's concepts of balance", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), pp.847~856 (1994)
- Fraser,B.J, "Validity and use of classroom envi-ron-ment instruments", Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26(2), pp.5~11 (1991)
- Hooper, S. R, "Effects of advance questioning and prior knowledge on science learning", Jour-nal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), pp.5~13 (1992)
- Johnson, D. W, "Learning together and alone: cooperation, competition, and individualiza-tion" (1987), Prentice-Hall
- Lawrenz, F, "The effect of grouping of laboratory students on selected educational outcomes", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(7), pp.699~708 (1984)
- Nastasi, B. K, "So-cial-cognitive interactions, motivation, and cognitive growth in logo programming and CAI problem-solving environ-ments", Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, pp.150~158 (1990)
- Okebukola, P. A, "Cooperative, com-petitive, and individualistic science laboratory interac-tion patterns: Effects on students' achievement and acqui-sition of practical skills", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(9), pp.875~884 (1984)
- Peterson, P. L, "Abi-lity-treatment interaction effects on children's learning in large-group and small-group approaches", American Educa-tional Research Journal, 18(4), pp.453~473 (1981)
- Pintrich, P. R, "Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance", Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, pp.33~40 (1990)
- Swing, S. R, "The relationship of stu-dent ability and small-group interaction to student achieve-ment", American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), pp.259~274 (1982)
- Webb,N.M, "Student interaction and learning in small groups", Review of Educational Research, 52(3), pp.421~445 (1982)
- Webb,N.M, "Peer interaction and learning in coo-perative small groups", Journal of Educational Psycho-logy, 74(5), pp.642~655 (1982)
- Webb,N.M, "Student interacting and learning in small groups: A research summaury. Learning to coope-rative, cooperating to learn" (1985), Plenum