본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등과학 수업에서 과학적 논변생성 탐구학습이 학생의 과학과 핵심역량, 과학적 추론 능력 및 주장을 정당화하는 방법에 미치는 효과

The Effects of Scientific Argumentation Generation Inquiry Learning on Scientific Core Competencies, Scientific Reasoning Abilities, and the Way to Justify a Claims in Elementary Science Classes

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study investigated the effect of the scientific argumentation generation inquiry learning program on the scientific core competencies, scientific reasoning abilities, and the way of justifying a claims of elementary school students' in elementary science classes. To this end, it was conducted with 4th grade students of P elementary school in G-si, Gyeonggi-do, and the results are as follows. First, as a result of examining the changes in students' scientific core competencies, in the pre-test, the average of the experimental group was higher than that of the comparative group, but there was no statistically significant difference. In the post-test, the average of the experimental group was high, and there was a statistically significant difference. Second, as a result of changes in scientific reasoning ability, the average of the comparative group was high in the pre-test, but there was no statistically significant difference. On the other hand, in the post-test, the average of the experimental group was higher than that of the comparative group, and there was a statistically significant difference. Third, there was a statistically significant difference in causal among students' way to justify their claims.

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of the scientific argumentation generation inquiry learning program on the scientific core competencies, scientific reasoning abilities, and the way of justifying a claims of elementary school students' in elementary science classes. To this end, it was conducted with 4th grade students of P elementary school in G-si, Gyeonggi-do, and the results are as follows. First, as a result of examining the changes in students' scientific core competencies, in the pre-test, the average of the experimental group was higher than that of the comparative group, but there was no statistically significant difference. In the post-test, the average of the experimental group was high, and there was a statistically significant difference. Second, as a result of changes in scientific reasoning ability, the average of the comparative group was high in the pre-test, but there was no statistically significant difference. On the other hand, in the post-test, the average of the experimental group was higher than that of the comparative group, and there was a statistically significant difference. Third, there was a statistically significant difference in causal among students' way to justify their claims.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)