본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기업의 사회적 책임이 기업 이미지에 미치는 영향 - 차원별 파급효과와 메시지 유형을 중심으로 -

The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Image: The Role of Spillover Effect and Negativity Effect based on CSR dimensions

김종근|김성진
한국마케팅학회 (Korean Marketing Association)|2010.01|아시아마케팅저널 (Asia Marketing Journal)|제11권 제4호|pp. 49-67

0

조회

0

다운로드

78

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

기업의 사회적 책임corporate social responsibilitycorporate imagespillover effect기업 이미지메시지 유형파급 효과부정성 효과types of messagenegativity effect
주제분류경영학

초록

기존의 많은 연구들은 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)이 기업 성과와 높은 관련성이 있음을 보여 왔다. 하지만 대부분의 연구들이 기업의 사회적 책임을 단일 차원으로 보거나 구체적인 활동 중심으로 보고 있다는 한계점을 가지고 있다. 본 연구는 이를 극복하기 위해 Schwartz and Carroll(2003)이 제시한 CSR의 세 가지 차원을 바탕으로, 각 차원별 메시지가 소비자들의 기업 이미지에 미치는 영향을 확인해 보고자 하였다. 연구 결과, 세 가지 기업의 사회적 책임 차원 중 법적 책임과 윤리적 책임에 대한 메시지는 파급효과가 일어나 다른 차원들에 대한 평가 결과에도 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 긍정적 메시지일 때보다 부정적 메시지일 경우, 부정성 효과로 인한 파급효과가 더 커져, 법적 책임과 윤리적 책임에 대한 부정적인 메시지는 경제적 책임에 대한 메시지보다 기업 이미지를 더 크게 훼손시키는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

Previous researches have proven that corporate social responsibility(adhere CSR) is positively related to corporate performance. But Most of CSR related researches have several limitations. One of limitations is that those researches treated CSR as unidimensional construct. Almost researchers in the area of CSR concepts insisted that CSR is consist of multi dimensions. Carroll's four dimensions of CSR have been utilized by numerous academicians. Carroll asserted that CSR is composed of four dimensions: economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibility. But Carroll's dimensions were revised as three dimensions by Schwartz and Carroll, because ethical and philanthropic responsibility are not mutually exclusive. If CSR construct is composed of multiple dimensions, a message related to one of dimensions changes beliefs or evaluations about other dimensions that are not mentioned in the message. This phenomenon is called as "spillover effect". According to Ahluwalia, Unnava, and Burnkrant, negative information spills over to attributes that are associated with the target attributes but not mentioned in the message. Like this, this preponderant effect of negative information over positive information has been termed the "negativity effect". In this paper, authors try to prove the spillover effect and negativity effect among Schwartz and Carroll's three dimensions(economic, legal, and ethical responsibility) of CSR. The results of this study show that messages related to legal and ethical responsibility cause spillover effect and influence consumers' evaluation to other dimensions. Moreover, when negativity effect is added on spillover effect, spillover effect is more increased. It means that negative messages related to legal and ethical responsibility is more harmful to corporate image than negative message related to economic responsibility. The results of this study will help companies to manage corporate image using CSR messages as marketing communication tools. Companies should manage messages related to legal and ethical responsibility for more efficiently managing corporate image. Specially, because negative messages related to legal and ethical responsibility are more harmful to corporate image, companies must take care not to spread out negative message related to legal and ethical responsibility. Finally, we discuss the implications of the findings and limitations.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Ahluwalia, Rohini, "The Moderating Role of Commitment on the Spillover Effect of Marketing Communications", Journal of Mar- keting Research, 38(4), pp.458~470 (2001)
  2. Anderson, James C., "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach", Psychological Bulle- tin, 103(3), pp.411~423 (1988)
  3. Aupperle, K. E., "An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability", Aca- demy of Management Journal, 28(2), pp.446~463 (1985)
  4. Barich, H., "A Framework for Marketing Image Management", Sloan Management Review, 32(2), pp.94~104 (1991)
  5. Becker-Olsen, Karen L., "The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsi- bility On Consumer Behavior", Journal of Business Research, 59, pp.46~53 (2005)
  6. Bowen, H. R., "Social responsibilities of the businessman" (1953), Harper & Row
  7. Brown, Tom J., "The Company and the Product: Corporate As- sociations and Consumer Product Responses", Journal of Marketing, 61(1), pp.68~84 (1997)
  8. Carroll, A. B., "A Three-dimensional Con- ceptual Model of Corporate Social Perfor- mance", Academy of Management Review, 4, pp.497~505 (1979)
  9. Carroll, A. B., "The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders", Business Horizons, 34, pp.39~48 (1991)
  10. Clarkson, M. B. E., "A Stakeholder Frame- work for Analyzing and Evaluating Cor- porate Social Performance", Academic Ma- nagement Review, 20(1), pp.92~117 (1995)
  11. Dichter, Emest, "What's in an Image", The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2(Winter), pp.75~81 (1985)
  12. Fishbein, Martin, "Ac- ceptance, Yielding, and Impact: Cognitive Processes in Persuasion. in: Cognitive Res- ponses in Persuasion" (1981), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  13. Fiske, Susan T., "Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Ne- gative and Extreme Behavior", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), pp.889~906 (1980)
  14. Folks, V. S., "Effects of Information About Firms' Ethical and Unethical Actions on Consumers' Attitudes", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), pp.243~260 (1999)
  15. Fornell, Claes, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measure- ment Error", Journal of Marketing Re- search, 18, pp.39~50 (1981)
  16. Fombrun, C., "What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Cor- porate Strategy", Academy of Manage- ment Journal, 33(2), pp.233~258 (1990)
  17. Freeman, R. E., "Business Ethics: The State of The Art" (1991), Oxford University Press
  18. Herr, Paul M., "Effects of Word-of Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective", Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), pp.454~462 (1991)
  19. Homer, P. M., "Attitudinal Effects of Character-based Versus Competence- based Negative Political Communications", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(2), pp.163~185 (1994)
  20. Ibrahim, N., "The Cor- porate Social Responsiveness Orientation of Board Members", Journal of Business Ethics, 14(5), pp.405~501 (1995)
  21. Janakiraman, Narayan, "Spillover Effects: How Consumers Respond to Un expected Ch- anges in Price and Quality", Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), pp.361~369 (2006)
  22. Klein, Jill, "Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers' At- tributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product-Harm Crisis", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), pp.203~217 (2004)
  23. Kotler, Philip, "Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations, 2nd ed." (1982), Prentice-Hall
  24. Maheswaran, Durairaj, "The Influence of Message Fra- ming and Issue Involvement", Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), pp.361~367 (1990)
  25. Maignan, Isabelle, "Consumer' Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison", Journal of Bu- siness Ethics, 30(1), pp.57~72 (2001)
  26. Maignan, Isabelle, "Measuring Corporate Citizenship in Two Countries: The Case of the United States and France", Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), pp.283~297 (2000)
  27. Maignan, Isabelle, "Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework", Journal of the Aca- demy of Marketing Science, 32(1), pp.3~19 (2004)
  28. Nunnally, Jum C., "Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed." (1978), McGraw-Hill
  29. Pinkston, T. S., "A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orien- tations. Have They Changed?", Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), pp.199~206 (1996)
  30. Prabu, David, "Corporate Social Responsibility Practices, Corporate Identity and Purchase Intention: A Dual-process Model", Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(3), pp.291~313 (2005)
  31. Schwartz, M. S., "Cor- porate Social Responsibility: a Three Domain Approach", Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), pp.503~530 (2003)
  32. Sen, Sankar, "Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility", Journal of Marketing Research, 38, pp.225~243 (2001)
  33. Skowronski, John J., "Negativity and Extremity Biases in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanations", Psychological Bulletin, 105, pp.131~142 (1989)
  34. Till, Brian D., "Toward Effective Use of Cause-related Marketing Alliances", Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(7), pp.474~484 (2000)
  35. Winters, L. C., "The Effects of Brand Advertising on Company Image: Implication for Corporate Advertising", Journal of Ad- vertising Research, 26(4), pp.54~59 (1986)
  36. Wood, D. J., "Corporate Social Perfor- mance Revisited", Academy of Manage- ment Review, 16, pp.691~718 (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

기업 평가에서 사회적 책임 활동의 영향: 전반적 평가와 공익적 평가의 구분홍성준한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2012 · 제30권 제4호기업의 사회적 책임활동이 기업 이미지 형성과 기업 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 공유가치창출 인지정도에 따른 차이비교이돈곤, 이명진한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2014 · 제12권 제9호기업의 사회적 책임 활동이 소비자의 기업 평가에 미치는 영향: 신뢰와 반기업 인식의 매개효과홍성준한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2012 · 제30권 제2호기업의 사회적 책임이 반기업정서에 미치는 영향: 시민사회활동가의 평가를 중심으로이명진, 최지영한국사회연구소 · 한국사회2015 · 제16권 제2호기업의 사회적 책임 진정성이 기업 사회적 책임 평가, 관계의 질, 그리고 기업 이미지에 미치는 영향김성진, 김종근한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2012 · 제30권 제7호기업의 사회적 책임 광고(CSR) 효과 연구 : 광고유형 기업 명성 브랜드ᐨ공익 관련성을 중심으로염동섭, 최윤슬한국광고PR실학회 · 광고PR실학연구2018 · 제11권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

고객시민행동의 주요 선행 및 결과 변수에 관한 연구: 기업과 고객 간의 장기지향성에 미치는 영향을 중심으로박정은, 이성호, 박미영pp. 1-19Three Stage Performances and Herding of Domestic and Foreign Films in the Korean Market한민희, 강현모, 김대승pp. 21-48컬러 불일치가 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향: 자아이미지 일치성의 조절효과를 고려하여이상은, 김상용pp. 69-93만족도와 재구매 간 관계에 있어서 상황적 영향의 조절효과에 관한 연구 - 인지 종결 욕구와 일시적 자아 해석의 조절효과를 중심으로 -이민훈, 하영원pp. 95-119마케팅과 Ethnography: 학제간 연구를 위한 제언유창조pp. 121-128
원문 보기