초등 과학과 교육과정과 교사용지도서 목표 간의 비교 분석 - 2009 개정 교육과정 3~4학년을 중심으로
Analysis of the Alignment between Elementary Science Curriculum and Teacher Guidebook - Examining Learning Objectives in 2009 Grade 3~4 Science Curriculum -
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Teacher guidebooks are practical and commonly used resources for teachers to deliver the goals and contents of science curriculum in classroom teaching. Thus, the alignment of teacher guidebooks and science curriculum could be critical to undertake the effectiveness of curriculum implication in science classrooms. This study is to investigate how the learning objectives of science curriculum are implicated in teacher guidebooks by analyzing the dimensions of knowledge and cognitive process in learning objectives in both documents. Grade 3~4 learning objectives (82 objectives in the curriculum, 459 in the teacher guidebook, 541 in total) in 2009 Revised science curriculum and teacher guidebooks were coded and analyzed based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The analysis focused on how the knowledge dimensions and cognitive processes of the curriculum were emphasized and restructured in the teacher guidebooks to examine the coalition between the two important documents. The study found: 1) the learning objectives in Grade 3~4 in both documents were skewed to certain knowledge dimension (conceptual) and cognitive process (understand); 2) there was a high coalition between unit objectives and lesson objectives in the teacher guidebooks, however, relatively low coalition between the curriculum and the teacher guidebooks; and 3) learning objectives in the curriculum were delivered in teacher guidebooks in various patterns (similar, detailed, additional, in portion, and the same), and ‘detailed’ and ‘additional’ were frequently shown. There also appeared new objectives in the teacher guidebooks, which were not present in the curriculum. The findings in this study could provide some suggestions to the current project of developing 2015 Science Curriculum in regard to understanding the dimensions of knowledge and cognitive process of learning objectives and their alignments with textbooks and teacher guidebooks.
Abstract
Teacher guidebooks are practical and commonly used resources for teachers to deliver the goals and contents of science curriculum in classroom teaching. Thus, the alignment of teacher guidebooks and science curriculum could be critical to undertake the effectiveness of curriculum implication in science classrooms. This study is to investigate how the learning objectives of science curriculum are implicated in teacher guidebooks by analyzing the dimensions of knowledge and cognitive process in learning objectives in both documents. Grade 3~4 learning objectives (82 objectives in the curriculum, 459 in the teacher guidebook, 541 in total) in 2009 Revised science curriculum and teacher guidebooks were coded and analyzed based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The analysis focused on how the knowledge dimensions and cognitive processes of the curriculum were emphasized and restructured in the teacher guidebooks to examine the coalition between the two important documents. The study found: 1) the learning objectives in Grade 3~4 in both documents were skewed to certain knowledge dimension (conceptual) and cognitive process (understand); 2) there was a high coalition between unit objectives and lesson objectives in the teacher guidebooks, however, relatively low coalition between the curriculum and the teacher guidebooks; and 3) learning objectives in the curriculum were delivered in teacher guidebooks in various patterns (similar, detailed, additional, in portion, and the same), and ‘detailed’ and ‘additional’ were frequently shown. There also appeared new objectives in the teacher guidebooks, which were not present in the curriculum. The findings in this study could provide some suggestions to the current project of developing 2015 Science Curriculum in regard to understanding the dimensions of knowledge and cognitive process of learning objectives and their alignments with textbooks and teacher guidebooks.
참고문헌 (32)
- Anderson, L. W., "Curricular alignment : A reexamination", Theory Into Practice, 41(4), pp.255~260 (2002)
- Anderson, L. W., "A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Abridged edition" (2001), Longman
- Ball, D. L., "Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?", Educational Researcher, 25(9), pp.6~8 (1996)
- Baratz-Snowden, J. C., "Opportunity to learn : Implications for professional development", Journal of Negro Education, 62, pp.311~323 (1993)
- Bloom, "Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners" (1956), Longmans
- Collette, A. T., "Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools" (1989), Merrill Pub. Co
- Go, J., "역사적 접근의 교육과정 이해와 개발" (2010), Kyoyookbook
- 한기애, "제7차 초등학교 과학과 교사용 지도서의 활용 실태 분석", 초등과학교육, 22(1), pp.51~64 (2003), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Hauenstein, A. D., "신 교육목표분류학" (2004), Kyoyookbook
- 전영미, "초등학교 교사의 교사용 지도서 활용 방식에 대한 연구 : 두 명의 미국 교사를 중심으로", 한국교원교육연구, 23(3), pp.5~24 (2006), 한국교원교육학회
- Kang, H. -S., "현대 교육과정 탐구" (2011), Hakjisa
- 김영신, "Bloom의 신 교육목표분류학에 기초한 초등학교 과학과 수업 목표 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(5), pp.570~579 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Klopfer, L. E., "Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning" (1971), MaGraw-Hill
- "Elementary and secondary education act"[URL]
- Krathwohl, D. R., "A revision of Bloom's taxonomy : An overview", Theory into Practice, 41(4), pp.212~218 (2002)
- Kweon, J., "Teachers' perception and improvement on the elementary science teacher's guide", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 20(1), pp.75~90 (2001)
- Kwon, J. -S,, "Klopfer's classification of educational objectives for science education", Journal of Science and Science Education, 9, pp.67~72 (1984)
- 이은영, "Bloom의 신 교육목표분류학에 따른 슬기로운 생활 교과의 수업 목표 분석", 초등과학교육, 31(1), pp.1~12 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 이혜숙, "제 7차 초·중등 생물 교육과정의 수업 목표 분석 - Bloom의 신 교육목표분류학에 기초하여-", 생물교육, 36(1), pp.52~62 (2008), 한국생물교육학회
- Liu, X., "Alignment between the physics content standard and the standardized test : A comparison among the United States New York State, Singapore, and China Jiangsu", Science Education, 93(5), pp.777~797 (2009)
- Marzano, R. J., "Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives" (2001), Corwin Press, Inc
- Merrill, M. D., "Instructional design theories and models" (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Ornstein, A. C., "Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues" (2004), Allyn and Bacon
- Porter, A. C., "Measuring the content of instruction : Uses in research and practice", Educational Researcher, 31(7), pp.3~14 (2002)
- Porter, A. C., "Alignment as a teacher variable", Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), pp.27~51 (2007)
- Posner, G. J., "Analyzing the curriculum" (2004), McGraw-Hill
- Posner, G. J., "Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers", pp.2006, Pearson
- Ryle, G., "The concept of mind" (1971), Barnes
- Seo, D. W., "An analysis on completeness of educational objectives in elementary science curriculum", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 14(3), pp.321~329 (1994)
- 위수민, "Bloom의 신교육 목표 분류학에 기초한 초등학교 3, 4학년 과학과 7차 교육과정과 2007 개정 과학과 교육과정의 목표체계 비교", 초등과학교육, 30(1), pp.10~21 (2011), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Winfield, L. F., "Investigating test content and curriculum content overlap to assess opportunity to learn", Journal of Negro Education, 62, pp.288~310 (1993)
- Wolf, R. M., "Evaluation in education: Foundations of competency assessment and program review" (1990), Praeger