초등 과학영재학생들이 만든 과학 유머의 유형 및 과학 유머 만들기에 대한 인식 분석
An Analysis of Types of Scientific Humors Made by Scientifically-gifted Elementary School Students and Their Perceptions of the Making Scientific Humor
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed the types of scientific humors made by scientifically-gifted elementary school students and their perceptions of making scientific humor. For this, 77 students from 4th to 6th graders of gifted science education center in Seoul National University of Education were selected. Scientific humors made by the students were analyzed according to the number and types. Their perceptions of making scientific humor were also analyzed through a questionnaire and group interviews. The analysis of the results revealed that most of scientifically-gifted students made more than 2 scientific humors, and the number of scientific humor for each students varied from 0 to 11. The most types they made were the descriptive type and the pun using pronunciation type, but they made various types without any special type to be biased. And They made more the dialogue type than the narrative type, especially the riddle type. They used scientific knowledge that preceded the knowledge of science curriculum in their grade level over two or more years. The scientific knowledge of chemistry was used more than physics, biology, earth science and combination field. The name utilization type was more than the characteristic utilization type and the principle utilization type. Scientific humors in the everyday situation were more than humors in artificial situation. The students had various positive perceptions in making scientific humor such as increase of scientific knowledge, increase of various thinking abilities, deep understanding of science concept and principle, increase of interest and motivation about science and science learning, and increase on sense of humor. They had also some negative perceptions related to difficulties in the process of making scientific humor, lack of fun, and lack of time in the class.
Abstract
This study analyzed the types of scientific humors made by scientifically-gifted elementary school students and their perceptions of making scientific humor. For this, 77 students from 4th to 6th graders of gifted science education center in Seoul National University of Education were selected. Scientific humors made by the students were analyzed according to the number and types. Their perceptions of making scientific humor were also analyzed through a questionnaire and group interviews. The analysis of the results revealed that most of scientifically-gifted students made more than 2 scientific humors, and the number of scientific humor for each students varied from 0 to 11. The most types they made were the descriptive type and the pun using pronunciation type, but they made various types without any special type to be biased. And They made more the dialogue type than the narrative type, especially the riddle type. They used scientific knowledge that preceded the knowledge of science curriculum in their grade level over two or more years. The scientific knowledge of chemistry was used more than physics, biology, earth science and combination field. The name utilization type was more than the characteristic utilization type and the principle utilization type. Scientific humors in the everyday situation were more than humors in artificial situation. The students had various positive perceptions in making scientific humor such as increase of scientific knowledge, increase of various thinking abilities, deep understanding of science concept and principle, increase of interest and motivation about science and science learning, and increase on sense of humor. They had also some negative perceptions related to difficulties in the process of making scientific humor, lack of fun, and lack of time in the class.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강정란, "초등과학영재와 일반학생의 유머감각, 셀프리더십 및 대인관계능력 비교 및 관계 분석", 과학영재교육, 8(1), pp.1~13 (2016), 한국과학영재교육학회
- 김윤경, "아재 개그의 유머 기제와 담화 구조 연구 -KBS 개그콘서트 ‘아재씨’를 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, 52(1), pp.247~277 (2017), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- 김주용, "아동의 유머스타일 척도 개발 및 타당화", 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 24(1), pp.97~119 (2012), 한국상담심리학회
- 노태희, "포화 용액 개념에 대해 초등 과학 영재와 일반 학생들이 만든 비유의 특성과 대응 관계 이해도 및 대응 오류", 초등과학교육, 28(3), pp.292~303 (2009), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 류은종, "수수께끼의 조성 수법과 그 유형에 대하여", 어학연구, 26(3), pp.615~630 (1990)
- 박경빈, "한눈에 보는 영재교육" (2014), 학지사
- 박숙희, "고등학생의 유머감각과 창의적 인성과의 관계", 영재와 영재교육, 13(2), pp.303~317 (2014), 한국영재교육학회[DOI]
- 박지영, "과학영재교육프로그램 분석 모형의 고안과 국내의 과학영재를 위한 생물프로그램의 실태 분석", 생물교육, 33(1), pp.122~131 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
- 윤진서, "유머의 유형 분류에 관한 고찰 - 유머의 원리와 구조를 중심으로 -", 우리말연구, (27), pp.266~299 (2010), 우리말학회
- 이봉우, "과학영재교육에서 교사들이 겪는 어려움", 초등과학교육, 27(3), pp.252~260 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 이은주, "영재아동과 일반아동의 창의성과 유머감각 및 유머스타일 비교", 석사, 영재교육, pp.2010
- 이지영, "초등 과학영재 학생과 일반 학생의 과학상상화 특성 및 과학상상화 그리기에 대한 인식 비교", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(5), pp.817~827 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 이해명, "영재교육의 이론과 실제" (2006), 교육과학사
- 임부연, "유아놀이에서 나타나는 언어유희에 대한 현상학적 연구", 열린유아교육연구, 13(6), pp.219~240 (2008), 한국열린유아교육학회
- 조현지, "유머 종류에 따른 유머 선호와 활용에 관한 연구 : 성별, 연령별 차이를 중심으로", 한국언론정보학보, 31, pp.355~377 (2005), 한국언론정보학회
- 지성구, "대학수업에서 교수 유머의 분석", 글로벌경영학회지, 9(4), pp.65~84 (2012), 글로벌경영학회[DOI]
- 차문희, "교사의 유머 감각과 과학 학습 효과의 상관관계 연구", 과학교육연구지, 30(1), pp.67~83 (2006)
- 최원호, "초등과학영재 판별도구의 개발과 이해" (2009), 북스힐
- 허영주, "교사유머의 주요 유형과 유머의 목적․소재․표현 방식에 따른 성공과 실패의 차이 분석", 교육방법연구, 21(2), pp.21~50 (2009), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
- 허영주, "교사유머의 유형화 및 유형별 교육 효과에 관한 연구", 교육방법연구, 23(1), pp.1~29 (2011), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
- Abraham, R. R., "Use of humour in classroom teaching: Students’ perspectives", Thrita, 3(2), pp.e10517~ (2014)
- Ardalan, K., "Using entertaining metaphors in the introduction of the case method in a case-based course", Exploring Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, pp.69~96 (2015)
- Banas, J., "A review of humor in educational settings : Four decades of research", Communication Education, 60(1), pp.115~144 (2011)
- Berge M., "The role of humor in learning physics : A study of undergraduate students", Research in Science Education, 47(2), pp.427~450 (2017)
- Christensen, A. P., "Clever people: Intelligence and humor production ability", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), pp.136~143 (2018)
- Ehle, M. J., "Facing the intercultural dialogue by using humor in the training of mathematics and science teachers", Facing the Intercultural Dialogue, pp.212~217 (2008)
- Erdman, L., "Laughter therapy for patients with cancer", Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 11(4), pp.55~67 (1994)
- Garner, R. L., "Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha!", College Teaching, 54(1), pp.177~180 (2006)
- Greengross, G., "Personality traits, intelligence, humor styles, and humor production ability of professional stand-up comedians compared to college students", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), pp.74~82 (2012)
- Kellerby, D. K., "Effective use of humor in a secondary science classroom", doctoral, pp.2011
- Martin, R. A., "Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being : Development of the humor styles questionnaire", Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), pp.48~75 (2003)
- McGhee, P. E., "Humor: Its origin and development" (1979), W. H. Freeman
- Nusbaum, E. C., "A meta-analysis of individual differences in humor production and personality", pp.2015
- Renzulli, J. S., "Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students", Exceptional Children, 38(3), pp.243~248 (1971)
- Roth, W. M., "A study of laughter in science lessons", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), pp.437~458 (2011)
- Wanzer, M. B., "An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning : Instructional humor processing theory", Communication Education, 59(1), pp.1~18 (2010)
- Ziegler, J. B., "Use of humour in medical teaching", Medical Teacher, 20(4), pp.341~348 (1998)