Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Version of the A-ONE
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective : The purpose of this study was to develop a Korean version of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL)-focused Occupation-Based Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE) through cross-cultural adaptation and examine its validity and reliability. Methods : This study translated the A-ONE into Korean and performed cross-cultural adaptation for the Korean population. After the development of the Korean version of the A-ONE, cross-cultural and concurrent validities were analyzed. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability were also evaluated. Results : We adapted three items to the Korean culture. The Korean version of the A-ONE showed high cross-cultural validity with a content validity index (I-CVI) >0.9. It correlated with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) (r=0.52–0.77, p<0.001), except for communication. Cronbach’s α was 0.58-0.93 for the functional independence scale (FI) and 0.42-0.93 for the neurobehavioral specific impairment subscale (NBSIS). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated high test-retest and inter-rater reliability for FI (ICC=0.79-1.00 and 0.75-1.00, respectively) and NBSIS (ICC=0.74-1.00 and 0.72-1.00, respectively). Conclusion : The Korean version of the A-ONE is well adapted to the Korean culture and has good validity and reliability. It is recommended to evaluate ADL performance skills and neurobehavioral impairments simultaneously in Korea.
Abstract
Objective : The purpose of this study was to develop a Korean version of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL)-focused Occupation-Based Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE) through cross-cultural adaptation and examine its validity and reliability. Methods : This study translated the A-ONE into Korean and performed cross-cultural adaptation for the Korean population. After the development of the Korean version of the A-ONE, cross-cultural and concurrent validities were analyzed. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability were also evaluated. Results : We adapted three items to the Korean culture. The Korean version of the A-ONE showed high cross-cultural validity with a content validity index (I-CVI) >0.9. It correlated with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) (r=0.52–0.77, p<0.001), except for communication. Cronbach’s α was 0.58-0.93 for the functional independence scale (FI) and 0.42-0.93 for the neurobehavioral specific impairment subscale (NBSIS). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated high test-retest and inter-rater reliability for FI (ICC=0.79-1.00 and 0.75-1.00, respectively) and NBSIS (ICC=0.74-1.00 and 0.72-1.00, respectively). Conclusion : The Korean version of the A-ONE is well adapted to the Korean culture and has good validity and reliability. It is recommended to evaluate ADL performance skills and neurobehavioral impairments simultaneously in Korea.
참고문헌 (25)
- Arnadottir, G., "The brain and behavior: Assessing cortical dysfunction through activities of daily living (ADL)" (1990), Mosby Elsevier
- Arnadottir, G., "Measuring the impact of body functions on occupational performance: Validation of the ADL-focused Occupation-based Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE)", Doctor, pp.2010
- Arnadottir, G., "Difference in impact of neurobehavioural dysfunction on activities of daily living performance between right and left hemispheric stroke", Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(10), pp.903~907 (2010)[DOI]
- Arnadottir, G., "Neurobehavioral functions evaluated in naturalistic contexts : Rasch analysis of the A-ONE neurobehavioral impact scale", Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(5), pp.439~449 (2012)[DOI]
- Beaton, D. E., "Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures", Spine, 25(24), pp.3186~3191 (2000)
- Carter, R., "Rehabilitation research: Principles and applications", pp.318~325 (2015), Mosby Elsevier
- Conti, J., "Cognitive assessment : A challenge for occupational therapists in Brazil", Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 11(2), pp.121~128 (2017)[DOI]
- Duffy, L., "Reliability(Inter-rater Agreement)of the Barthel Index for Assessment of stroke survivors : Systematic review and meta-analysis", Stroke, 44(2), pp.462~468 (2013)[DOI]
- Epstein, J., "A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), pp.435~441 (2015)[DOI]
- Hamilton, B. B., "Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure(FIM)", Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26(3), pp.115~119 (1994)
- Hodges, M. R., "Pervasive computing", pp.192~209 (2010), Springer
- Jia, Z. Y., "Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the simplified Chinese version of the knee outcome survey activities of daily living scale", Arthroscopy : The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 32(10), pp.2009~2016 (2016)[DOI]
- Johnstone, B., "Neuropsychological assessment in rehabilitation : Current limitations and applications", NeuroRehabilitation, 5(1), pp.75~86 (1995)[DOI]
- Kang, J, "Validity and reliability of the crossculturally adapted the Korean version of the ADL-focused occupation-based neurobehavioral evaluation (A-ONE)", Master, pp.2017
- Katz, N., "Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment(LOTCA)battery for brain-injured patients : Reliability and validity", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43(3), pp.184~192 (1989)[DOI]
- Koo, T. K., "A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research", Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), pp.155~163 (2016)[DOI]
- Kwon, Y. C., "Korean version of mini-mental state examination(MMSE-K)", Journal of the Korean Neurological Association, 28(1), pp.123~135 (1989)
- Law, M., "The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure : An outcome measure for occupational therapy", Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(2), pp.82~87 (1990)[DOI]
- Lohr, K. N., "Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments : Attributes and review criteria", Quality of Life Research, 11(3), pp.193~205 (2002)
- Mahoney, F. I., "Functional evaluation : The Barthel Index : A simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill", Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, pp.61~65 (1965)
- Polit, D. F., "Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations", Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), pp.459~467 (2007)[DOI]
- Roy, J. S., "Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the knee outcome survey–activities of daily living scale", Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(6), pp.614~623 (2014)[DOI]
- Sousa, V. D., "Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research : A clear and user-friendly guideline : Validation of instruments or scales", Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), pp.268~274 (2011)[DOI]
- Ursachi, G., "How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators", Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, pp.679~686 (2015)[DOI]
- 유은영, "한국 작업치료사의 영역별 평가도구 사용 동향", 대한작업치료학회지, 14(3), pp.27~37 (2006), 대한작업치료학회