丁時翰ㆍ李栻과 李柬ㆍ韓元震의 人物性同異論 비교

Abstract

This paper aim for a comparative study on debates of In-mul-sung-dong-i-lon(人物性同異論). The investigative objects are four scholars, just Jeong Si-Han, Lee Sik, Lee Gan, Han Won-Jin. Jeong Si-Han, Lee Sik joined in Toegye school, and Lee Gan, Han Won Jin joined in Yulgok school in 17∼18 century. Jeong Si-Han and Lee Sik were master and pupil, but the former insisted on In-mul-sung-i-lon(人物性異論) that human nature is different from things natures, while the latter insisted on In-mul-sung-dong-lon(人物性同論) that human nature and things natures have a common origin. Lee Gan and Han Won-Jin were fellow students, but the former insisted on In-mul-sung-dong-lon, while the latter insisted on In-mul-sung-i-lon. There was a theoretical resemblance, because they were all together Neo-Confucianists. However they also had different views on Li-Chi and the virtual feelings and the common feelings originated from attached school. In addition to, they also had different opinions in the inner parts of the school. So they had multifarious opinions on this problem. But we can discover an similar aspect crossing schools. Jeong Si-Han and Han Won-Jin insisted on In-mul-sung-i-lon, on the other hand Lee Sik and Lee Gan insisted on In-mul-sung-dong-lon. This paper considered the similar aspects of philosophical attitude and chief purpose crossing academic tradition. And I estimated a reason of occurrence of this debate in 18th century.