AAAS유전 문항과 라쉬 모델을 활용한 동형의 유전개념검사지 개발
Development of two equivalent genetics concept assessments using AAAS genetics concept test items and Rasch model
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구의 목적은 AAAS유전 문항과 라쉬 모델을 활용하여 가형과 나형의 동형의 유전개념검사지를 개발하는 것이다. 이 연구를 위하여 80문항의 AAAS 유전개념검사문항이 번역되었고 445명의 고등학생에게 투입되었다. 많은 문항수의 제한점을 극복하기 위하여 라쉬 모델의 문항연결 방법을 활용하였다. 연구 결과 34문항으로 구성된 가형과 나형의 두 유전개념 검사지가 생성되었다. 두 검사지의 라쉬 점수의 상관관계는 0.71이며, 라쉬 모델 분석 수치가 거의 일치하였다. 이 연구를 통해 생성된 두 형의 유전개념검사도구는 학생들의 유전개념을 확인하거나 유전개념학습프로그램의 효과를 검증하는데 활용될 수 있을 것이다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is the development of two equivalent genetics concept assessments using AAAS genetics concept test items and Rasch model. To this end, we translated 80 AAAS genetics concept test items and administered them to 445 high school students. Given students’ test fatigue due to too many test items, we used the item linking method by Rasch model in order to minimize the number of test items. Findings revealed that two equivalent genetics concept assessments were generated. The Pearson correlation coefficient of test scores of two equivalent genetics concept assessments were 0.71 (p <<0.001) and the statistics of Rasch analysis of two assessments were nearly identical. Two equivalent genetics concept assessments generated by this study can be used to examine students’ understanding of genetics concept and the efficacy of learning program for students’ genetics concept.
참고문헌 (18)
- 강혜정, "과학사를 이용한 교수 학습 전략이 유전 개념 이해에 미치는 효과", 생물교육, 33(2), pp.223~234 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
- 김관희, "C-Fern을 이용한 유전 실험 수업이 중학생 유전 개념 체계의 변화에 미치는 효과", 생물교육, 38(1), pp.195~207 (2010), 한국생물교육학회
- 김혜연, "Rapid-cycling Brassica rapa를 이용한 멘델 유전 모듈이 예비 교사의 유전 개념 변화에 미치는 효과", 생물교육, 38(2), pp.376~390 (2010), 한국생물교육학회
- 김희백, "유전 개념의 이해를 위한 염색체 모형 이용 수업의 효과", 생물교육, 30(3), pp.282~288 (2002), 한국생물교육학회
- 전동렬, "<현장과학교육>을 발간하며" (2007), 현장과학교육
- Anderson DL, "Fisher KM and Norman GJ(2002)Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, pp.952~978 (2002)
- Federer MR, "Using a constructed-response instrument to explore the effects of item position and item features on the assessment of students’ written scientific explanations", Research in Science Education, 45(4), pp.527~553 (2015)
- Hattie J, "Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis", Review of Educational Research, 66, pp.99~136 (1996)
- Hedges LV, "Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education", Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, pp.60~87 (2007)
- Using and developing measurement instruments in science education: A Rasch Modeling approach, "Liu X", Information Age Publishing, ~ (2010)
- Lo B, "Conflict-of-interest policies for investigators in clinical trials", New England Journal of Medicine, 343, pp.1616~1620 (2000)
- Messick S, "Validity of psychological assessment:Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning", American Psychologist, 50, pp.741~ (1995)
- Nehm RH, "Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open‐response instrument, and an oral interview", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, pp.1131~1160 (2008)
- Neumann I, "Evaluating instrument quality in science education: Rasch‐based analyses of a nature of science test", International Journal of Science Education, 33, pp.1373~1405 (2011)
- A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas, "National Research Council", The National Academies Press, ~ (2012)
- PISA 2009 Technical Report, "OECD", OECD Publishing, ~ (2012)
- Roediger HL, "The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice", Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, pp.181~210 (2006)
- Smith MK, "The genetics concept assessment: A new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics", CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7, pp.422~430 (2008)
