대리운전과 관련한 법률관계 분석 - 대리운전 중의 사고로 인해 사상자가 발생한 경우를 중심으로 -
The Analysis of the Legal Relations Regarding Designated Driving Focusing on the Cases in which an Accident by a Designated Driver Caused Injuries or Deaths
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
If a third party (excluding the client) is injured or killed in an automobile accident by a designated driver, the driver and the driver's client hold joint co-operator liability. So they can seek compensation either from the vehicle possessor's comprehensive automobile accident insurance, or the designated driver insurance policy: Provided that the compensation payable by personal indemnification I shall be sought from the vehicle possessor's comprehensive automobile accident insurance, and the compensation payable by personal indemnifications II under the same provisions sought from the designated driver insurer. (Personal indemnifications I and II are prescribed under the provisions of the standardized agreement of automobile accident Insurance and the comprehensive automobile handling businessman insurance policy.) If the designated driver does not hold designated driver insurance on him/her, the victim may claim damages from the vehicle possessor's comprehensive automobile accident insurance in accordance with personal indemnification I and II. On the other hand, if it is the client who is injured or killed in an automobile accident which was caused by his/her designated driver, the designated driver has operator liability for the damages, whereas the client becomes "a third party" under Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and shall be subject to protection. Therefore, the client may receive compensation within personal indemnification I from the comprehensive automobile accident insurance which he/she has taken out. This means if the designated driver holds designated driver insurance, the scope of indemnification that the victim(the client) may claim from the designated driver insurance company is restricted to the scope beyond personal indemnification I. In other words, compensation payable by personal indemnification I shall be claimed from the Comprehensive Automobile Accident Insurance the vehicle possessor holds, and the compensation payable by personal indemnification II shall be claimed from the designated driver insurance company. Therefore, if the designated driver does not have designated driver insurance and cannot afford for compensation for damage, the client can be compensated only within personal indemnification I from the vehicle possessor's comprehensive automobile accident insurance.
참고문헌 (13)
- 동부화재법무파트, "자동차보험과 대리운전자보험과의 상관관계 검토", 손해해보험, 통권 : 466 (2007), 대한손해보험협회
- 박세민, "음주운전대행중의 자동차사고에 대한 책임관계와석 연구", 보험학회지, (73), pp.21~48 (2006), 한국보험학회
- 오지용, "代理運轉에 있어 運行者性과 他人性의 判斷基準", 저스티스, 통권 : 94, pp.269~283 (2006), 한국법학원
- 李秉奭, "運轉代行과 運行者責任에 關한 一考察", 기업법연구, 14, pp.177~191 (2003), 한국기업법학회
- 古笛惠子, "代行運轉依賴者によゐ自賠責保險金請求の可否", 判例タイムズ, (885) (1995), 判例タイムズ社
- 石田滿, "運轉代行業者の運行供用者責任と許諾被保險者性", 損害保險硏究, 55(3) (1993), 損害保險事業總合硏究所
- 中村心, "運行代行と自賠法3條の他人性", 判例タイムズ, (971) (1998), 判例タイムズ社
- 금융감독위원회, "보도자료", ~ (2006)
- 금융감독원, "정례브리핑자료", ~ (2007)
