냉전의 전개와 일본공산당의 혁명노선 변경

Abstract

For The criticism of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the Chinese Communist Party, initiated after the Cold War, was raised in order to change the strategic tactics of the Communist Party to intensify the struggle against the United States in Japan and prepare for a war on the Korean Peninsula. But this criticism intensified the sectarian struggle within the Japanese Communist Party, and as a result did not play a role in disturbing the United States. The external forces then changed the logic of criticism in the form of defending the mainstream of the Communist Party of Japan. Thus, the non-mainstream, which initially embraced external criticism, turns into an opposition to external criticism and a force that hinders unification within the Communist Party. In this situation, as the mainstream declares an active armed struggle against the United States, the mainstream transforms external forces that initially criticize them into a form of support for them. In other words, during the Cold War, the Communist Party’s strategy was changed from occupied peace revolution to armed struggle that disrupted US troops in war base Japan. External forces, which pursued political development in favor of their country during the Cold War, eventually made the Communist Party unsubjective, contributing to the confusion and giving rise to the wrong tactics of extreme leftistism. In addition, the constitution, which failed to escape the lack of external authority followingism, external dependence, authoritarianism and democratic democracy in the Communist Party, was the cause of deepening organizational divisions and sectarian struggles, resulting in the loss of public support immediately after the defeat.