피해자 고소권의 법적 쟁점 - 피해자의 고소적격을 중심으로 -
The Right of Victims' Accusation
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Accused of a crime have the right to harm the victim party should of course say that the rights will be retained. In addition, victims of crime are generally social, legal, because it will often victims, which stands for the country's citizens have a basic right to stand complaint should be addressed. Therefore, the concept of crime victims as a subject of complaint is not to be interpreted as limiting sense. Thus, the ability of the civil action complaint by the ability of families without requiring that the de facto ability should see a doctor. Ability to conduct judicial recognition of the award, so it is widely recognized sense. We are also cases of adultery and obstruction of official business and legal interests, such as social and national legal interests complaint is recognized even if the infringement, and that victims are recognized based on the concept of complaint range “means a crime or act of the other party, including" should be interpreted. Thus, the social and legal interests of national personal legal interests for the sinner. On the other hand, the concept of the victim must be a victim of the legal implications. For example, the lion victim of libel relatives or descendants of victims should be legal sense. complaint a legal concept, and therefore requires that the legal status because it should . The interpretation of the concept of the victims of these victims complaint zoom events and at the same time to ensure the legality of the exercise will help you efficiently.
Abstract
Accused of a crime have the right to harm the victim party should of course say that the rights will be retained. In addition, victims of crime are generally social, legal, because it will often victims, which stands for the country's citizens have a basic right to stand complaint should be addressed. Therefore, the concept of crime victims as a subject of complaint is not to be interpreted as limiting sense. Thus, the ability of the civil action complaint by the ability of families without requiring that the de facto ability should see a doctor. Ability to conduct judicial recognition of the award, so it is widely recognized sense. We are also cases of adultery and obstruction of official business and legal interests, such as social and national legal interests complaint is recognized even if the infringement, and that victims are recognized based on the concept of complaint range “means a crime or act of the other party, including" should be interpreted. Thus, the social and legal interests of national personal legal interests for the sinner. On the other hand, the concept of the victim must be a victim of the legal implications. For example, the lion victim of libel relatives or descendants of victims should be legal sense. complaint a legal concept, and therefore requires that the legal status because it should . The interpretation of the concept of the victims of these victims complaint zoom events and at the same time to ensure the legality of the exercise will help you efficiently.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김성규, "公訴提起의 條件으로서의 告訴 ― 親告罪에 있어서의 告訴를 중심으로 ―", 성균관법학, 15(1), pp.112~126 (2003), 법학연구소
- 김재민, "경찰수사론" (2008), 경찰대학
- 김재민, "범죄피해자의 정신적ㆍ신체적 피해의 치료 및 예방에 관한 정부시책의 비교 연구 - 한ㆍ일 양국의 ｢범죄피해자기본법｣과 ｢범죄피해자 보호ㆍ지원에 관한 기본계획｣상의 내용을 중심으로 -", 경찰법연구, 6(1), pp.142~169 (2008), 한국경찰법학회
- 김재민, "헌법상 기본권 규정에 대한 피해자학적 고찰(1)", 경찰법연구, 3(1) (2005), 한국경찰법학회
- 김재민, "헌법상 기본권 규정에 대한 피해자학적 고찰(2)", 경찰법연구, 4(1) (2006), 한국경찰법학회
- 김택수, "프랑스의 사인소추제도", 경찰법연구, 2(1) (2004), 한국경찰법학회
- 김형준, "친고죄의 고소와 그 취소", 법학논문집, 24(2) (2000), 중앙대학교 법학연구소
- 이동희, "수사론" (2009), 경찰공제회
- 박상기, "고소제도에 관한 연구" (1997)
- 신동운, "신형사소송법" (2008), 법문사
- 심희기, "지송 이재상 교수 화갑논문기념집" (2004), 박영사
- 오영근, "지송 이재상교수화갑논문기념집" (2004), 박영사
- 이용식, "지송 이재상교수 화갑논문기념집" (2004), 박영사
- 이존걸, "수사단서로서의 고소", 법학연구, (19), pp.305~325 (2005), 한국법학회
- 신동운, "입문형사수속법" (2003), 법문사
- 장다혜, "성폭력 범죄 친고죄 폐지 이후 피해자 보호방안 - 성폭력 피해자의 사생활과 명예보호의 의미를 중심으로 -", 경찰법연구, 11(2), pp.3~39 (2013), 한국경찰법학회
- 장응혁, "형사절차상 피해자 진술 - 형사소송법 제294조의2와 일본형사소송법 제292조의2에 대한 비교를 중심으로 -", 경찰법연구, 8(2), pp.122~146 (2010), 한국경찰법학회
- 조상제, "형사제재와 범죄피해자보호사상의 결합가능성", 피해자학연구, 15(2), pp.111~128 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 하옥현, "성폭행 피해 아동에 대한 효과적인 조사기법 모색", 경찰법연구, 7(2), pp.265~298 (2009), 한국경찰법학회
- 허일태, "간통죄의 위헌성", 저스티스, (104), pp.118~135 (2008), 한국법학원
- 黒澤睦, "告訴権・親告罪の法的性質に関する一試論--親告罪における告訴は訴訟条件にすぎないのか", 富大経済論集, 51(1) (2005), 富山大学
- 黒澤睦, "告訴権の歴史的発展と現代的意義", 法学研究論集, (18) (2002), 明治大学
- 黒澤睦, "修復的司法としての親告罪？", 法学研究論集, (16) (2002), 明治大学
- 黒澤睦, "親告罪における告訴の意義", 法学研究論集, (15) (2001), 明治大学
- 黒澤睦, "告訴期間制度の批判的検討", 法学研究論集, 17 (2002), 明治大学
- 樋口晴彦, "捜査機関の告訴・告発の不受理について", 警察学論集 (2002), 立花書房
- 平田紳, "告訴人のいない犯罪の非犯罪化論", 福岡大学法学論叢, (31) (1987), 福岡大学総合研究所
- 東条伸一郎, "訴訟条件としての告発と告訴不可分の原則の関係", 警察学論集, 31(4) (1978), 立 花書房
- 高橋勝好, "告訴の理論と実際", 警察学論集, 15(4) (1962), 立花書房