본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

노화에 대한 주관성 연구 : 코오리엔테이션의 시각

Subjectivity on Aging : a Corientational aproach

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타사회과학

초록

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to identify the factors and the subjectivity on aging among the youth and elderly and also to examine the characteristics and relationships between these two groups on attitudes to aging. Method : Thirty two youths and thirty five elderlies classified 30 selected Q statements in to 9 points standard. They classified twice for the subjectivity on aging of the other group's. The collected data was analyzed by using a QUANL pc program. Result : The youth have three(role-modeling prefer, transcendental perspectives, worring) types of response and the elderly have two(transcendental perspectives, reality recognition) types. The youth saw elderly as having three(pessimistic perspectives, active acceptance, aging rejector) types of response and to the elderly saw the youth as having four(positive acceptance, dependents, aging denial, independents) types. The relationship between the above-mentioned types will be examined in a coorientation model, the subjectivity of the youth and elderly on aging indicates a relatively high understanding. But, the subjectivity of each groups on aging and the subjectivity of each groups saw the other groups as having indicate low congruencies both in the youth and elderly. Conclusion : There is not at issue generational gaps of perception, but the preconception of being different between each other. The results of this study provide understanding about aging between generations and social consensus for aging.

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to identify the factors and the subjectivity on aging among the youth and elderly and also to examine the characteristics and relationships between these two groups on attitudes to aging. Method : Thirty two youths and thirty five elderlies classified 30 selected Q statements in to 9 points standard. They classified twice for the subjectivity on aging of the other group's. The collected data was analyzed by using a QUANL pc program. Result : The youth have three(role-modeling prefer, transcendental perspectives, worring) types of response and the elderly have two(transcendental perspectives, reality recognition) types. The youth saw elderly as having three(pessimistic perspectives, active acceptance, aging rejector) types of response and to the elderly saw the youth as having four(positive acceptance, dependents, aging denial, independents) types. The relationship between the above-mentioned types will be examined in a coorientation model, the subjectivity of the youth and elderly on aging indicates a relatively high understanding. But, the subjectivity of each groups on aging and the subjectivity of each groups saw the other groups as having indicate low congruencies both in the youth and elderly. Conclusion : There is not at issue generational gaps of perception, but the preconception of being different between each other. The results of this study provide understanding about aging between generations and social consensus for aging.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. "종교참여에 따른 노인의 죽음 불안 연구" (1993)
  2. "한국노인의 노화체험", 10(2), pp.234~244 (1998)
  3. "Q 방법론의 이해와 적용 서강대학교 언론문화연구소" (1990)
  4. "대학생이 갖고 있는 노인에대한 고정관념 분석", 21(2), pp.71~83 (2001)
  5. "대학생의 노인에 대한 이미지연구", 19(2), pp.97~111 (1999)
  6. "성공적 노화 개념의 인식에 관한 연구 -Q 방법론적 접근-", 22(2), pp.75~93 (2002)
  7. "중년 여성의 늙어감 경험에 대한 현상학적 연구", 11(4), pp.673~683 (1999)
  8. "여성노인의 노화경험" (2002)
  9. "한국 노인의 노인되어감에 대한 문화기술지" (2003)
  10. "죽음의 이해-코오리엔테이션의시각", 28(2), pp.270~279 (1998)
  11. "중년후기 성인의 성공적 노후에대한 주관성", 13(2), pp.65~80 (2006)
  12. "재가노인의 일상생활기능상태, 삶의질 및 가정간호요구에 관한 연구", 10(2), pp.73~82 (1998)
  13. "노인의 의미에 대한주관성 연구", 7(2), pp.271~286 (2000)
  14. "국내 노인간호연구 분석과 발전방향", 28(3), pp.676~694 (1998)
  15. "노년학 교육이 대학생의 노인에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향", 21(3), pp.29~41 (2002)
  16. "국제간 비교-고령화 속도, 합계출산율" (2007), 통계청
  17. "대학생들의 노인에 대한 태도에 관한연구", 20(3), pp.115~127 (2000)
  18. "Concepts andcriteria of mental health and aging AmericanJournal of Orthopsychiatry", pp.242~254 (1981)
  19. "Ageism: negative and positive" (1999), New York: Springer Publishing
  20. "implications for research on aging", pp.1~29 (1988)
  21. "Designing for change: Attitudes toward the elderly and intergenerational programming", 20(1-2), pp.161~173 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)