본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 목적어의 한정성 요인에 따른 영목적어 코퍼스연구

A Study on the Null Objects According to Definiteness of Objects in English

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the linguistic factors for null object phenomena in English and the frequency of use of null object vs. realized object in COCA corpus depending on the definiteness of the objects. In this paper, we classify the objects to talk about the factors for null objects in this way: an indefinite object, a definite object, an object with its complement and a reflexive pronoun object. It is claimed that the deletion of an indefinite object is usually not context-dependent since it is predictable, while that of a definite object is context-dependent since the readers are expected to recover the definite objects for themselves. It is also argued that the verbs in the category of definite or indefinite objects have different frequency of use for null objects in the COCA corpus. The verbs which show the most frequent null objects are ‘sing’(71%) and ‘fail’(76%) in indefinite and definite object classes, respectively.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the linguistic factors for null object phenomena in English and the frequency of use of null object vs. realized object in COCA corpus depending on the definiteness of the objects. In this paper, we classify the objects to talk about the factors for null objects in this way: an indefinite object, a definite object, an object with its complement and a reflexive pronoun object. It is claimed that the deletion of an indefinite object is usually not context-dependent since it is predictable, while that of a definite object is context-dependent since the readers are expected to recover the definite objects for themselves. It is also argued that the verbs in the category of definite or indefinite objects have different frequency of use for null objects in the COCA corpus. The verbs which show the most frequent null objects are ‘sing’(71%) and ‘fail’(76%) in indefinite and definite object classes, respectively.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 강범모, "언어 기술을 위한 코퍼스의 구축과 빈도(통계) 활용", 한국사전학, (12), pp.7~40 (2008), 한국사전학회[DOI]
  2. 성창섭, "영어의 목적어 생략", 언어와 언어교육, 6, pp.45~60 (1991)
  3. 조운용, "인칭재귀대명사의 통사적 화용적 특성에 관한 연구", 현대영미어문학, 25(1), pp.171~186 (2007), 현대영미어문학회
  4. Allerton, D, "Deletion and Proform Reduction", Journal of Linguistics, 11, pp.3~237 (1975)
  5. Allerton, D., "Valency and English Verb" (1982), Academic Press
  6. Bach, E, "Control in Montague Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 10(4), pp.515~531 (1979)
  7. Bresnan, J., "Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective", pp.45~57 (1990), CSLI
  8. Bresnan, J., "Object Asymmetries in Comparative Bantu Syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2), pp.147~185 (1990)
  9. Browne, W, "Verbs and Unspecified NP Deletion", Linguistic Inquiry, 2, pp.259~260 (1971)
  10. Duskova, L, "A Note on Intransitive in the English Verb", Philologica Pragensia, 19, pp.172~182 (1976)
  11. Emma, G., "The Typology of Reflexives" (1987), Mouton de Gruyter
  12. Fillmore, C, "Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora", BLS, 12, pp.95~107 (1986)
  13. Givon, T., "Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol.1" (1984), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  14. Givon, T., "English Grammar" (1993), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  15. Haiman, J., "Syntax and Semantics Vol. 15(Studies in Transitivity)" (1982), Academic Press
  16. Jespersen, O., "Essentials of English Grammar" (1933), George Allen and Unwin
  17. Jespersen, O., "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles Part Ⅲ" (1949), George Allen and Unwin
  18. Jespersen, O., "The Philosophy of Grammar" (1965), Bantam
  19. Larjavaara, M., "Pre´sence ou Absence de L’objet: Limites du Possible Enfranc¸ais Contemporain" (2000), Academia Scientiarum Fennica
  20. Lehrer, D, "Verbs and Deletable Objects", Lingua, 25, pp.227~253 (1970)
  21. Levin, B., "English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation" (1993), The U of Chicago Press
  22. Lyons, J., "Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics" (1968), Cambridge University Press
  23. Lyons, J., "Semantics Vol.2" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  24. Marantz, P., "On the Nature of Grammatical Relations" (1984), The MIT Press
  25. Massam, D., "Recipe Context Null Objects in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 20(1), pp.134~139 (1989)
  26. Noailly, M, "Les Myste`res de la Transitivite´ Invisible", Langages, 127, pp.96~109 (1997)
  27. O’Grady, W., "Transitivity, Grammatical Relations and Voice in a Theory of Word-Based Grammar", Ph.D., pp.1978
  28. Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  29. Rappaport-Hovav, M., "The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors", pp.97~134 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  30. Rice, S., "Toward a Cognitive Model of Transitivity", Ph.D, pp.1987
  31. Sadock, J, "Read at Your Own Risk: Syntactic and Semantic Horrors You Can Find in Your Medicine Chest", CLS, 10, pp.599~608 (1974)
  32. Sarah, C., "A Modular Account Of Null Objects In French" (2005), Blackwell Publishing
  33. Wechsler, S, "Prepositional Phrases from the Twilight Zone", Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 20(2), pp.127~154 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)