공범증인 면책제도에 대한 고찰
A Study on the Witness Immunity as the Strategy for Defeating Crime Syndicate
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Witness immunity is a new strategy for defeating such special crimes as organized crime, drug cartel and corruption offence. These crimes are committed by plural persons who have a closed network, so that we can achieve great success in rooting out underlying evils with the aid of a person involved. Meanwhile, if the conspirators are not willing to talk, investigators could not help catching criminals red-handed or using highly intrusive surveillance techniques. These difficulties have designed some innovative devices for investigation, one of them is so called witness immunity. Nowadays, witness immunity is accepted as the criminal justice weapon for eradicating syndicate crimes by many advanced countries involving U.S.A., Germany, France and the United Kingdom. While U.S.A. take a step forward by implementing crime immunity, France and Germany assume a relatively prudent attitude to remain in punishment immunity. The United Kingdom is the forefront nation that equips itself with not only crime immunity but also punishment immunity. This paper offers the introduction witness immunity into South Korean criminal justice system, and designs the concrete proposal as follows. Firstly, the target shall be clearly and limitedly made such as organized crime, drug cartel and corruption offence. Secondly, the methods of immunity had better consist of crime immunity and punishment immunity, while evidence use immunity is recommended as the method of punishment immunity rather than transactional immunity. Thirdly, witness immunity shall be implemented by the prosecutors with the approval of judges. Lastly, we also need to make a full defensive preparation to minimize the side effects of witness immunity, the one of which is the new legislation to punish the obstructor of justice.
Abstract
Witness immunity is a new strategy for defeating such special crimes as organized crime, drug cartel and corruption offence. These crimes are committed by plural persons who have a closed network, so that we can achieve great success in rooting out underlying evils with the aid of a person involved. Meanwhile, if the conspirators are not willing to talk, investigators could not help catching criminals red-handed or using highly intrusive surveillance techniques. These difficulties have designed some innovative devices for investigation, one of them is so called witness immunity. Nowadays, witness immunity is accepted as the criminal justice weapon for eradicating syndicate crimes by many advanced countries involving U.S.A., Germany, France and the United Kingdom. While U.S.A. take a step forward by implementing crime immunity, France and Germany assume a relatively prudent attitude to remain in punishment immunity. The United Kingdom is the forefront nation that equips itself with not only crime immunity but also punishment immunity. This paper offers the introduction witness immunity into South Korean criminal justice system, and designs the concrete proposal as follows. Firstly, the target shall be clearly and limitedly made such as organized crime, drug cartel and corruption offence. Secondly, the methods of immunity had better consist of crime immunity and punishment immunity, while evidence use immunity is recommended as the method of punishment immunity rather than transactional immunity. Thirdly, witness immunity shall be implemented by the prosecutors with the approval of judges. Lastly, we also need to make a full defensive preparation to minimize the side effects of witness immunity, the one of which is the new legislation to punish the obstructor of justice.
참고문헌 (16)
- 탁희성, "공범증인면책제도에 관한 연구" (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김석우, "독일의 형벌감면부 진술제도 : 이른바 ‘공범증인 면책제도’에 대한 고찰", 형사법의 신동향, 통권 : 4, pp.45~66 (2006), 대검찰청
- 김영기, "사법협조자 형벌감면제도에 대한 고찰", 형사법의 신동향, 통권 : 23, pp.376~462 (2009), 대검찰청
- 김학원, "국회청문회에 있어서 증인제도의 실효성 확보방안", 국회보, (377), pp.28~31 (1998)
- 서창희, "Grand Jury 및 Immunity를 이용한 수사", 해외연수검사연구논문집, 1, pp.149~242 (1995), 법무연수원
- 이선욱, "증인면책제도의 도입방안에 관한 연구", 석사, 법학, pp.2010
- 면책조건부 증언취득제도 도입 시론, 참고인진술 확보방안 연구, "이영상", 검찰미래기획단, 174~218 (2007)
- 최성진, "사법협조자 형벌감면제도에 관한 소고", 법학연구, 51(2)통권 : 64, pp.283~317 (2010), 법학연구소
- 홍기만, "영국의 면책조건부 증언취득제도", 사법, 1(13), pp.65~133 (2010), 사법발전재단
- Dixon, Robert G, "The Fifth Amendment and Federal Immunity Statutes", George Washington Law Review, 22, pp.447~480 (1954)
- Menza, Alexander J, "WITNESS IMMUNITY: UNCONSTITUTIONAL, UNFAIR, UNCONSCIONABLE", Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journa, 9, pp.505~547 (1999)
- Natapoff, Alexandra, "Deregulating Guilt: The Information Culture of the Criminal System", Cardozo Law Review, 30, pp.965~1021 (2008)
- Rowland, Ann C, "Effective Use of Informants and Accomplice Witnesses", South Carolina Law Review, 50, pp.679~697 (1999)
- Schreiber, Amanda J, "Dealing with the Devil: An Examination of the FBI’s Troubled Relationship with its Confidential Informants", Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 34, pp.301~368 (2001)
- 권용태, "재야법조계 형사소송법개정안 왜 반대하나", 법률신문, ~ (2011)
- 면책조건부 증언취득제도에 관한 연구, "오영근", 대검찰청, ~ (2005)
