본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score as Predictors for Severe Trauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system are widely used for critically ill patients. We evaluated whether APACHE II score and SOFA score predict the outcome for trauma patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed trauma patients admitted to the ICU in a single trauma center between January 2014 and December 2015. The APACHE II score was figured out based on the data acquired from the first 24 hours of admission; the SOFA score was evaluated based on the first 3 days in the ICU. A total of 241 patients were available for analysis. Injury Severity score, APACHE II score, and SOFA score were evaluated. Results: The overall survival rate was 83.4%. The non-survival group had a significantly high APACHE II score (24.1 ± 8.1 vs. 12.3 ± 7.2, P < 0.001) and SOFA score (7.7 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) at admission. SOFA score had the highest areas under the curve (0.904). During the first 3 days, SOFA score remained high in the non-survival group. In the non-survival group, cardiovascular system, neurological system, renal system, and coagulation system scores were significantly higher. Conclusions: In ICU trauma patients, both SOFA and APACHE II scores were good predictors of outcome, with the SOFA score being the most effective. In trauma ICU patients, the trauma scoring system should be complemented, recognizing that multi-organ failure is an important factor for mortality.

Abstract

Background: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system are widely used for critically ill patients. We evaluated whether APACHE II score and SOFA score predict the outcome for trauma patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed trauma patients admitted to the ICU in a single trauma center between January 2014 and December 2015. The APACHE II score was figured out based on the data acquired from the first 24 hours of admission; the SOFA score was evaluated based on the first 3 days in the ICU. A total of 241 patients were available for analysis. Injury Severity score, APACHE II score, and SOFA score were evaluated. Results: The overall survival rate was 83.4%. The non-survival group had a significantly high APACHE II score (24.1 ± 8.1 vs. 12.3 ± 7.2, P < 0.001) and SOFA score (7.7 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) at admission. SOFA score had the highest areas under the curve (0.904). During the first 3 days, SOFA score remained high in the non-survival group. In the non-survival group, cardiovascular system, neurological system, renal system, and coagulation system scores were significantly higher. Conclusions: In ICU trauma patients, both SOFA and APACHE II scores were good predictors of outcome, with the SOFA score being the most effective. In trauma ICU patients, the trauma scoring system should be complemented, recognizing that multi-organ failure is an important factor for mortality.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Evans JA, "Epidemiology of traumatic deaths: comprehensive population-based assessment", World J Surg, 34, pp.158~163 (2010)
  2. Lefering R, "Revision of the multiple organ failure score", Langenbecks Arch Surg, 387, pp.14~20 (2002)
  3. Moreno R, "The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction", failure in intensive care: results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working group on sepsis related problems of the ESICM, 1999, pp.25, 686~696
  4. Knaus WA, "APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system", Crit Care Med, 13, pp.818~829 (1985)
  5. Dewar DC, "Comparison of postinjury multiple-organ failure scoring systems: Denver versus Sequential Organ Failure Assessment", J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 77, pp.624~629 (2014)
  6. Ferreira FL, "Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients", JAMA, 286, pp.1754~1758 (2001)
  7. Ciesla DJ, "A 12-year prospective study of postinjury multiple organ failure: has anything changed?", Arch Surg, 140, pp.432~438 (2005)
  8. Vincent JL, "The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction", failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, 1996, pp.22, 707~710
  9. Chawda MN, "Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system?", Injury, 35, pp.347~358 (2004)
  10. Baker SP, "The Injury Severity score: an update", J Trauma, 16, pp.882~885 (1976)
  11. Champion HR, "Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation", J Trauma, 40, pp.42~48 (1996)
  12. Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral AC, "Use of the sequential organ failure assessment score as a severity score", Intensive Care Med, 31, pp.243~249 (2005)
  13. Antonelli M, "Application of SOFA score to trauma patients: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment", Intensive Care Med, 25, pp.389~394 (1999)
  14. Hwang SY, "Comparison of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system, and Trauma and Injury Severity score method for predicting the outcomes of intensive care unit trauma patients", Am J Emerg Med, 30, pp.749~753 (2012)
  15. Wong DT, "A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients", Crit Care Med, 24, pp.1642~1648 (1996)
  16. Knaus WA., "Why measure severity?", Reanim Urgences, 3, pp.159~163 (1994)
  17. Milzman DP, "Pre-existing disease in trauma patients: a predictor of fate independent of age and injury severity score", J Trauma, 32, pp.236~243 (1992)
  18. McAnena OJ, "Invalidation of the APACHE II scoring system for patients with acute trauma", J Trauma, 33, pp.504~506 (1992)
  19. Boyd CR, "Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method--Trauma Score and the Injury Severity score", J Trauma, 27, pp.370~378 (1987)
  20. Dewar D, "Postinjury multiple organ failure", Injury, 40, pp.912~918 (2009)
  21. Norris R, "TRISS unexpected survivors: an outdated standard?", J Trauma, 52, pp.229~234 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

Performance of APACHE IV in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients: Comparisons with APACHE II, SAPS 3, and MPM0 IIIMihye Ko, Miyoung Shim, Sang-Min Lee, Soyoung Yoon, Yujin Kim대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2018 · 제33권 제4호The Ability of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV Score to Predict Mortality in a Single Tertiary Hospital권인선, 문재영, 민나은, 박동일, 박연희, 박영선, 박정은, 설영훈, 유상훈, 이영석, 이주상, 전규락, 정채욱, 최재우대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2017 · 제32권 제3호외과계 중환자실에서 APACHE II 점수의 타당도 검증과 조정 APACHE II 점수와 수행능력 비교김윤희, 이한나, 최은영대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2011 · 제26권 제4호Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Examination II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores for Predicting Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Treated with Therapeutic Hypothermia김성준, 김진주, 박원빈, 양혁준, 임용수, 조진성대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2014 · 제29권 제4호응급센터를 통해 중환자실에 입원한 패혈증 환자의 예후 예측에 있어서 응급센터 내원 초기의 APACHE 2 Score와 MEDS Score의 유용성 비교고찬영, 김영식, 신태용, 하영록대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2008 · 제23권 제2호중환자실에 입원하는 혈액종양 환자의 예후 예측에 있어 Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS 2)와 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score의 유용성강원기, 고원중, 권오정, 김호중, 박성훈, 서지영, 안진석, 정만표, 정철원대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2009 · 제24권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)