본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

응급센터를 통해 중환자실에 입원한 패혈증 환자의 예후 예측에 있어서 응급센터 내원 초기의 APACHE 2 Score와 MEDS Score의 유용성 비교

Comparing the Usefulness of the Initial Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) 2 Score in the Emergency Department (ED) and the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) Score for Predicting the Prognosis of Sep

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: To determine the prognostic value of the initial APACHE II score in the ED compared with the classic APACHE II score in the ICU and to check the usefulness of the MEDS score together for more rapid risk stratification of septic patients admitted to the ICU via the ED. Methods: We prospectively checked the initial APACHE II and MEDS scores of all the patients who had systemic inflammatory response syndrome in the ED and the classic APACHE II scores after admission to the ICU, as well 6 months later. We enrolled the only sepsis cases in the final diagnosis after reviewing the medical records. We evaluated the predictive abilities of the initial APACHE II and MEDS scores compared with the classic APACHE II score. Results: During 6 months, 58 patients diagnosed with sepsis were enrolled. Twenty-four (41.4%) patients died within 28 days of admission and 34 patients survived. The mortality group had a significantly higher mean classic APACHE II score (19 ± 6.7 vs. 15 ± 5.0, p < 0.01) and a higher mean MEDS score (16.67 ± 2.70 vs. 8.91 ± 3.11, p < 0.01) than the survivor group. The initial APACHE II score at the ED was not significantly different between the two groups. ROC analysis showed the discriminative power of the MEDS score in predicting mortality was much better than the APACHE II score (areas under the curves of the APACHE II score in the ED and ICU, and the MEDS scores were 0.668, 0.807, and 0.967, respectively; p < 0.01). Conclusions: The initial APACHE II score in the ED did not predict mortality better than the classic APACHE II score. However, the MEDS score predicted the poor prognosis of septic patients more rapidly and accurately in the ED than the APACHE II model.

Abstract

Background: To determine the prognostic value of the initial APACHE II score in the ED compared with the classic APACHE II score in the ICU and to check the usefulness of the MEDS score together for more rapid risk stratification of septic patients admitted to the ICU via the ED. Methods: We prospectively checked the initial APACHE II and MEDS scores of all the patients who had systemic inflammatory response syndrome in the ED and the classic APACHE II scores after admission to the ICU, as well 6 months later. We enrolled the only sepsis cases in the final diagnosis after reviewing the medical records. We evaluated the predictive abilities of the initial APACHE II and MEDS scores compared with the classic APACHE II score. Results: During 6 months, 58 patients diagnosed with sepsis were enrolled. Twenty-four (41.4%) patients died within 28 days of admission and 34 patients survived. The mortality group had a significantly higher mean classic APACHE II score (19 ± 6.7 vs. 15 ± 5.0, p < 0.01) and a higher mean MEDS score (16.67 ± 2.70 vs. 8.91 ± 3.11, p < 0.01) than the survivor group. The initial APACHE II score at the ED was not significantly different between the two groups. ROC analysis showed the discriminative power of the MEDS score in predicting mortality was much better than the APACHE II score (areas under the curves of the APACHE II score in the ED and ICU, and the MEDS scores were 0.668, 0.807, and 0.967, respectively; p < 0.01). Conclusions: The initial APACHE II score in the ED did not predict mortality better than the classic APACHE II score. However, the MEDS score predicted the poor prognosis of septic patients more rapidly and accurately in the ED than the APACHE II model.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Wheeler AP, "Treating patients with severe sepsis", N Engl J Med, 340, pp.207~214 (1999)
  2. Rivers E, "Early goal directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock", N Engl J Med, 345, pp.1368~1377 (2001)
  3. Knaus WA, "APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system", Crit Care Med, 13, pp.818~829 (1985)
  4. Le Gall JR, "A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients", Crit Care Med, 12, pp.975~977 (1984)
  5. Vincent JL, "The SOFA (sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dusfunction", failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-related problem of the European Society of Intensive Care medicine, 1996, pp.22, 707~710
  6. Bone RC, "Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP", SCCM Consensus Conference committee. American Collage of Chest Physicians, Crit Care Med, pp.1992, 20[DOI]
  7. Shapiro NI, "Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score: a prospectively derived and validated clinical prediction rule", Crit Care Med, 31, pp.670~675 (2003)
  8. Angus DC, "Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care", Crit Care Med, 29, pp.1303~1310 (2001)
  9. Brun-Buisson C, "The epidemiology of the systemic inflammatory response", Intensive Care Med, 26(suppl 1), pp.S64~74 (2000)
  10. Rangel-Frausto MS, "The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). A prospective study", JAMA, 273, pp.117~123 (1995)
  11. Sands KE, "Epidemiology of sepsis syndrome in 8 academic medical centers", JAMA, 278, pp.234~240 (1997)
  12. Sankoff JD, "Validation of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score in patients with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)", Crit Care Med, 32, pp.421~426 (2008)
  13. Brun-Buisson C, "Incidence, risk factor, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adult. A multicenter prospective study in intesnsive care units", JAMA, 274, pp.968~974 (1995)
  14. Lemeshow S, "Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care units patients", JAMA, 270, pp.2478~2486 (1993)
  15. Rhee K, "The Rapid Acute Physiology score", Am J Emerg Med, 5, pp.278~282 (1987)
  16. Shapiro NI, "Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score predicts 1-year mortality", Crit Care Med, 35, pp.192~198 (2007)
  17. Jones AE, "Performance of the Mortality in emergency department sepsis score for predicting hospital mortality among patients with sepsis and septic shock", Am J Emerg Med, 26, pp.689~692 (2008)
  18. Teres D, "The APACHE III prognostic system", Chest, 102, pp.1919~1920 (1992)
  19. Le Gall JR, "A new Simplified Acute Physiology score (SAPS II) based on European", North American multicenter study, 1993, pp.270, 2957~2963

관련 논문AI추천

응급센터를 통하여 중환자실에 입원하는 환자들의 시기별 예후 예측 인자 분석: 초기(응급센터)와 후기(중환자실) 예후 예측 인자김영식, 신태용, 안정환, 전현민, 정루비, 정성민, 하영록대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2012 · 제27권 제4호The Ability of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV Score to Predict Mortality in a Single Tertiary Hospital권인선, 문재영, 민나은, 박동일, 박연희, 박영선, 박정은, 설영훈, 유상훈, 이영석, 이주상, 전규락, 정채욱, 최재우대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2017 · 제32권 제3호외과계 중환자실에서 APACHE II 점수의 타당도 검증과 조정 APACHE II 점수와 수행능력 비교김윤희, 이한나, 최은영대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2011 · 제26권 제4호Performance of APACHE IV in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients: Comparisons with APACHE II, SAPS 3, and MPM0 IIIMihye Ko, Miyoung Shim, Sang-Min Lee, Soyoung Yoon, Yujin Kim대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2018 · 제33권 제4호패혈성 쇼크 환자에서 응급실 기반 조기목표지향치료의 효과(중증 패혈증 캠페인)김현, 김상철, 신태용, 신형진, 이강현, 황성오대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2010 · 제25권 제2호The Prognostic Factors of Pneumonia with Septic Shock in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department김진주, 양혁준, 임용수, 조진성, 황인철, Jong Won Kim, Sang Hyun Han대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2015 · 제30권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)