외과계 중환자실에서 APACHE II 점수의 타당도 검증과 조정 APACHE II 점수와 수행능력 비교
Validation of APACHE II Score and Comparison of the Performance of APACHE II and Adjusted APACHE II Models in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: The ability to accurately adjust for the severity of illness in outcome studies of critically ill patients is essential for clinical audits and trials. Several studies have been carried out to validate the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score in Korean ICUs. However, few reports have been presented that compare the performance of the APACHE II score and diagnostic category weighted APACHE II models in the surgical ICU population of Korea. The aim of this study was to validate APACHE II and compare the performance of the APACHE II and adjusted APACHE II models for emergency admission in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the prospective ICU registry was conducted in the SICU between October 2007 and February 2011. Calibration and discrimination were determined by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve from patients. Results: This study included 854 patients. SICU mortality was 9.4%. For APACHE II and adjusted APACHE II, AUCs were 0.791 and 0.757, respectively. Hosmer and Lemeshow C statistics showed good calibration for APAHCE II and for adjusted APACHE II (p ＞ 0.05). Conclusions: The ability of the APACHE II system in predicting group outcome is validated in a surgical ICU population by a receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression analysis. Mortality rates predicted using APACHE II exhibited good calibration and moderate discrimination. Diagnostic category weighted adjusted APACHE II did not improve the mortality prediction.
Abstract
Background: The ability to accurately adjust for the severity of illness in outcome studies of critically ill patients is essential for clinical audits and trials. Several studies have been carried out to validate the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score in Korean ICUs. However, few reports have been presented that compare the performance of the APACHE II score and diagnostic category weighted APACHE II models in the surgical ICU population of Korea. The aim of this study was to validate APACHE II and compare the performance of the APACHE II and adjusted APACHE II models for emergency admission in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the prospective ICU registry was conducted in the SICU between October 2007 and February 2011. Calibration and discrimination were determined by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve from patients. Results: This study included 854 patients. SICU mortality was 9.4%. For APACHE II and adjusted APACHE II, AUCs were 0.791 and 0.757, respectively. Hosmer and Lemeshow C statistics showed good calibration for APAHCE II and for adjusted APACHE II (p ＞ 0.05). Conclusions: The ability of the APACHE II system in predicting group outcome is validated in a surgical ICU population by a receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression analysis. Mortality rates predicted using APACHE II exhibited good calibration and moderate discrimination. Diagnostic category weighted adjusted APACHE II did not improve the mortality prediction.
참고문헌 (21)
- Gunning K, "ABC of intensive care: outcome data and scoring systems", BMJ, 319, pp.241~244 (1999)
- Knaus WA, "APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system", Crit Care Med, 13, pp.818~829 (1985)
- Knaus WA, "The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults", Chest, 100, pp.1619~1636 (1991)
- Zimmerman JE, "Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients", Crit Care Med, 34, pp.1297~1310 (2006)
- Ho KM, "Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score with organ failure scores to predict hospital mortality", Anaesthesia, 62, pp.466~473 (2007)
- Zhu M, "Strong impact of acute kidney injury on survival after liver transplantation", Transplant Proc, 42, pp.3634~3638 (2010)
- 박상규, "Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in Predicting Hospital Mortality of Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit Patients", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 24(3), pp.420~426 (2009), 대한의학회
- Hanley JA, "The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve", Radiology, 143, pp.29~36 (1982)
- Hanley JA, "A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases", Radiology, 148, pp.839~843 (1983)
- Hosmer DW, "A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model", Stat Med, 16, pp.965~980 (1997)
- Hilden J, "The measurement of performance in probabilistic diagnosis. III. Methods based on continuous functions of the diagnostic probabilities", Methods Inf Med, 17, pp.238~246 (1978)
- Nagelkerke NJD, "A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination", Biometrika, 78, pp.691~692 (1991)
- Rowan KM, "Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method", BMJ, 307, pp.977~981 (1993)
- Diamond GA, "What price perfection? Calibration and discrimination of clinical prediction models", J Clin Epidemiol, 45, pp.85~89 (1992)
- Altman DG, "What do we mean by validating a prognostic model", Stat Med, 19, pp.453~473 (2000)
- Capuzzo M, "Validation of severity scoring systems SAPS II and APACHE II in a single-center population", Intensive Care Med, 26, pp.1779~1785 (2000)
- Sakr Y, "Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit", Br J Anaesth, 101, pp.798~803 (2008)
- Vergouwe Y, "Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models", J Clin Epidemiol, 58, pp.475~483 (2005)
- Knaus WA, "The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults", Chest, 100, pp.1619~1636 (1991)
- Zimmerman JE, "Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients", Crit Care Med, 34, pp.1297~1310 (2006)
- Polderman KH, "Accuracy and reliability of APACHE II scoring in two intensive care units problems and pitfalls in the use of APACHE II and suggestions for improvement", Anaesthesia, 56, pp.47~50 (2001)