한국어 말하기 평가 타당화를 위한 논거 기반 접근법의 이해와 적용
Argument-based Approach for Validating KSL Speaking Assessment
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to provide a theoretical framework for the validation of KSL speaking assessment using the argument-based approach. As outline of the model for the validation process, the argument-based approach to validity as presented by Michael Kane was evaluated. The argument-based approach provides a framework for test score interpretation; its use is supported by appropriate and validated evidence. Based on Kane’s test validation approach, which constructed the claim and assumption of inferential processes, the argument-based approach described the assessment validation procedure into interpretive argument and validity argument. The validation of KSL speaking assessment using the argument-based approach was designed to support claims on the intended purposes of the assessment. This study presented each model of interpretive argument related to KSL speaking assessment for summative and high-stakes proficiency assessments.
Abstract
This study aimed to provide a theoretical framework for the validation of KSL speaking assessment using the argument-based approach. As outline of the model for the validation process, the argument-based approach to validity as presented by Michael Kane was evaluated. The argument-based approach provides a framework for test score interpretation; its use is supported by appropriate and validated evidence. Based on Kane’s test validation approach, which constructed the claim and assumption of inferential processes, the argument-based approach described the assessment validation procedure into interpretive argument and validity argument. The validation of KSL speaking assessment using the argument-based approach was designed to support claims on the intended purposes of the assessment. This study presented each model of interpretive argument related to KSL speaking assessment for summative and high-stakes proficiency assessments.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강석한, "외국인 한국어 말하기 시험의 평가자 요소가 채점에 미치는 영향", 이중언어학, (55), pp.1~29 (2014), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 강승혜, "한국어 고급 말하기 평가 도구 개발 기초 연구 - 고급 말하기 토론 활동을 중심으로 -", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 30, pp.1~21 (2005), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 김상경, "학문 목적 한국어 학습자의 말하기 능력 평가 방안 연구", 박사, pp.2015
- 김정숙, "한국어 말하기 능력 평가 기준 설정을 위한 연구", 이중언어학, 10, pp.24~33 (1993)
- 김중섭, "국제 통용 한국어 표준 교육과정 적용 연구" (2017), 국립국어원
- 민병곤, "학문 목적 한국어 말하기 평가 도구 개발 연구", 국어교육, (157), pp.309~340 (2017), 한국어교육학회
- 원미진, "한국어 말하기 평가 개발을 위한 채점 경향 분석 연구", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 47, pp.169~192 (2017), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 이동은, "한국어 말하기 숙달도 시험의 고찰을 통한 말하기 과제의 개발 방안", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (54), pp.223~248 (2009), 한민족어문학회
- 이향, "한국어 말하기 수행평가의 발음 범주 채점 방식에 따른 채점 신뢰도 분석 -다국면 라쉬 모형을 활용하여-", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 37, pp.325~355 (2012), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 이향, "말하기 수행 평가에서 발음 범주 채점의 최적화 방안 연구 -일반화가능도 이론을 활용하여-", 한국어교육, 23(2), pp.301~329 (2012), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 이 향, "한국어 말하기 수행 평가의 발음 범주 채점에 대한 타당성 검증", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
- 장은아, "한국어능력시험의 성별에 따른 차별기능문항 분석", 이중언어학, (32), pp.291~325 (2006), 이중언어학회
- 전나영, "한국어 말하기 능력 평가 도구 개발 연구", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 32, pp.259~338 (2007), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 정화영, "한국어 말하기 숙달도 평가 방안 : FSI Oral Proficiency Test 분석을 중심으로", 석사, 한국어교육, pp.2000
- American Educational Research Association, "Standards for educational and psychological testing" (1985), American Educational Research Association
- Chapelle, C. A., "Validity in language assessment", Annual review of applied linguistics, 19, pp.254~272 (1999)
- Chapelle, C. A., "Building a validity argument for the test of English as a foreign language. New York" (2008), Routledge
- Chapelle, C. A., "Does an argument-based approach to validity make a difference?", Educational Measurement : Issues and Practice, 29(1), pp.3~13 (2010)
- Chapelle, C. A., "Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation", Language testing, 32(3), pp.385~405 (2015)
- Cronbach, L. J., "Test validity", pp.3~17 (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Cronbach, L. J., "Intelligence: Measurement, theory, and public policy", pp.147~171 (1989), University of Illinois Press
- Feldt, L. S., "Educational measurement", pp.105~146 (1989), American Council on Educationa and Macmillan
- Haerrtel, E. H., "Educational measurement", pp.65~110 (2006), American Council on Education and Praeger
- Kane, M., "An argument-based approach to validation", Psychological Bulletin, 112, pp.527~535 (1992)
- Kane, M., "Educational measurement", pp.17~64 (2006), American Council on Education and Praeger
- Kane, M., "The argument-based approach to validation", School Psychology Review, 42(4), pp.448~457 (2013)
- Kane, M., "Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores", Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), pp.1~73 (2013)
- Lado, R., "Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests" (1961), McGraw Hill
- Messick, S., "Educational measurement", pp.13~103 (1989), American Council on Education and Macmillan
- Mislevy, R. J., "Focus article : On the structure of educational assessments", Measurement : Interdisciplinary research and perspectives, 1(1), pp.3~62 (2003)
- Read, J., "Assessing English proficiency for university study" (2015), Palgrave macmillan
- Snow, R. E., "Educational measurement", pp.263~332 (1989), American Council on Educationa and Macmillan
- Toulmin, S., "The uses of argument" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Weir, C. J., "Language testing and validation" (2005), Palgrave McMillan
- Youn, S. J., "Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods", Language Testing, 32(2), pp.199~225 (2015)