Review of National-Level Personal Health Records in Advanced Countries
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This review article examines international examples of personal health records (PHRs) in advanced countriesand discusses the implications of these examples for the establishment and utilization of PHRs in South Korea. Methods:This article synthesized PHR case reports of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) membercountries, the Global Digital Health Partnership website on PHRs, and patient portals of individual countries to review thestatus of PHR services. The concept and significance of PHRs were also discussed with respect to PHR utilization status inEuropean Union and OECD countries. Results: A review of international PHR services showed that the countries sharedcommon points regarding the establishment of Electronic Health Records and national health information infrastructure. Inaddition, the countries provided services centered on primary healthcare institutions and public hospitals. However, promotingmore positive participation and increasing the PHR acceptance rate requires workflow integration, including ElectronicMedical Records, the provision of incentives, and the preparation of a supportive legal framework. Conclusions: South Koreais also conducting a national-level PHR project. Since the scope of PHRs is extensive and a wide range of PHR services mustbe connected, an extensive trial-and-error process will be necessary. A long-term strategy should be prepared, and necessaryresources should be secured to establish national-level PHRs.
Abstract
Objectives: This review article examines international examples of personal health records (PHRs) in advanced countriesand discusses the implications of these examples for the establishment and utilization of PHRs in South Korea. Methods:This article synthesized PHR case reports of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) membercountries, the Global Digital Health Partnership website on PHRs, and patient portals of individual countries to review thestatus of PHR services. The concept and significance of PHRs were also discussed with respect to PHR utilization status inEuropean Union and OECD countries. Results: A review of international PHR services showed that the countries sharedcommon points regarding the establishment of Electronic Health Records and national health information infrastructure. Inaddition, the countries provided services centered on primary healthcare institutions and public hospitals. However, promotingmore positive participation and increasing the PHR acceptance rate requires workflow integration, including ElectronicMedical Records, the provision of incentives, and the preparation of a supportive legal framework. Conclusions: South Koreais also conducting a national-level PHR project. Since the scope of PHRs is extensive and a wide range of PHR services mustbe connected, an extensive trial-and-error process will be necessary. A long-term strategy should be prepared, and necessaryresources should be secured to establish national-level PHRs.
참고문헌 (24)
- Tang PC, "Personal health records : definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 13(2), pp.121~126 (2006)
- Sun S, "Messaging to your doctors: understanding patient-provider communications via a portal system", Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.1739~1748 (2013)
- Heart T, "A review of PHR, EMR and EHR integration : a more personalized healthcare and public health policy", Health Policy Technol, 6(1), pp.20~25 (2017)
- 최병관, "Analysis of Platforms and Functions of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems", Healthcare Informatics Research, 26(4), pp.311~320 (2020), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
- Kim YG, "Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea : a nation-wide survey", Int J Med Inform, 101, pp.100~107 (2017)
- "Clinical engagement in digital health: an international overview of enablers and barriers" (2019)[URL]
- 박유진, "Understanding Personal Health Record and Facilitating its Market", Healthcare Informatics Research, 26(3), pp.248~250 (2020), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
- "European hospital survey:benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (2012–2013)" (2013)[URL]
- Lupianez-Villanueva F, "Benchmarking deployment of eHealth among general practitio ners" (2018), Publications Office of the European Union
- Oderkirk J, "Readiness of electronic health record systems to contribute to national health information and research" (2017), OECD Publishing
- "View your record using an app" (2021)[URL]
- "My health record statistics" (2021)[URL]
- Best J., "The NHS App: opening the NHS’s new digital "front door" to the private sector", BMJ, 367, pp.l6210~ (2019)
- "Online version of the NHS Long term Plan" (2021)[URL]
- "BETA - NHS digital, data and technology standards framework" (2021)[URL]
- "Government of Nova Scotia: MyHealthNS Services Winding Up" (2020)[URL]
- "‘At my breaking point’: Halifax doctor pulls out of online health care tool" (2017)[URL]
- OECD, "Health in the 21st century: putting data to work for stronger health systems" (2019), OECD Publishing
- "1177 Vardguiden" (2021)[URL]
- Moll J, "Patients’ experiences of accessing their electronic health records : national patient survey in Sweden", J Med Internet Res, 20(11), pp.e278~ (2018)
- Armstrong S, "Patient access to health records: striving for the Swedish ideal", BMJ, 357, pp.j2069~ (2017)
- Hagglund M, "Patients’ access to health records", BMJ, 367, pp.l5725~ (2019)
- Vehko T, "E-health and ewelfare of Finland: check point 2018" (2019), National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
- Nohr C, "Nationwide citizen access to their health data : analysing and comparing experiences in Denmark, Estonia and Australia", BMC Health Serv Res, 17(1), pp.534~ (2017)