Evaluating the Landscape of Personal Health Records in Korea: Results of the National Health Informatization Survey
4
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This study examined the adoption and utilization of personal health records (PHR) across Korean medical institutionsusing data from the 2020 National Health and Medical Informatization Survey. Methods: Spearheaded by the Ministryof Health and Welfare and prominent academic societies, this study surveyed PHR utilization in 574 medical institutions. Results: Among these institutions, 84.9% (487 hospitals) maintained medical portals. However, just 14.1% (81 hospitals)had web-based or mobile PHRs, with 66.7% (28 of 42) of tertiary care hospitals adopting them. Tertiary hospitals led in PHRservices: 87.8% offered certification issuance, 51.2% provided educational information, 63.4% supported online payment,and 95.1% managed appointment reservations. In contrast, general and smaller hospitals had lower rates. Online medicalinformation viewing was prominent in tertiary hospitals (64.3%). Most patients accessed test results via PHRs, but other datatypes were less frequent, and only a few allowed downloads. Despite the widespread access to medical data through PHRs,integration with wearables and biometric data transfers to electronic medical records remained low, with limited plans forexpansion in the coming three years. Conclusions: Approximately two-thirds of the surveyed medical institutions providedPHRs, but hospitals and clinics in charge of community care had very limited PHR implementation. Government-led leadershipis required to invigorate the use of PHRs in medical institutions.
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined the adoption and utilization of personal health records (PHR) across Korean medical institutionsusing data from the 2020 National Health and Medical Informatization Survey. Methods: Spearheaded by the Ministryof Health and Welfare and prominent academic societies, this study surveyed PHR utilization in 574 medical institutions. Results: Among these institutions, 84.9% (487 hospitals) maintained medical portals. However, just 14.1% (81 hospitals)had web-based or mobile PHRs, with 66.7% (28 of 42) of tertiary care hospitals adopting them. Tertiary hospitals led in PHRservices: 87.8% offered certification issuance, 51.2% provided educational information, 63.4% supported online payment,and 95.1% managed appointment reservations. In contrast, general and smaller hospitals had lower rates. Online medicalinformation viewing was prominent in tertiary hospitals (64.3%). Most patients accessed test results via PHRs, but other datatypes were less frequent, and only a few allowed downloads. Despite the widespread access to medical data through PHRs,integration with wearables and biometric data transfers to electronic medical records remained low, with limited plans forexpansion in the coming three years. Conclusions: Approximately two-thirds of the surveyed medical institutions providedPHRs, but hospitals and clinics in charge of community care had very limited PHR implementation. Government-led leadershipis required to invigorate the use of PHRs in medical institutions.
참고문헌 (25)
- Castro EM, "Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care : a concept analysis based on a literature review", Patient Educ Couns, 99(12), pp.1923~1939 (2016)[DOI]
- Perez-Ortiz AC, "Pharmacogenetic biomarkers associated with paclitaxel response in Mexican women with locally advanced breast cancer", J Clin Oncol, 34(15_Suppl), pp.e13004~ (2016)[DOI]
- Ruhi U, "Utility, value, and benefits of contemporary personal health records : integrative review and conceptual synthesis", J Med Internet Res, 23(4), pp.e26877~ (2021)[DOI]
- Turvey C, "Blue Button use by patients to access and share health record information using the Department of Veterans Affairs’ online patient portal", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 21(4), pp.657~663 (2014)[DOI]
- "An update from NHS England on accelerating citizen access to GP data, 1 November 2022" (2023)[URL]
- Suna T, "Finnish National Archive of Health Information(KanTa) : general concepts and information model", Fujitsu Sci Tech J, 47(1), pp.49~57 (2011)
- "MedMjj project" (2023)[URL]
- 이지산, "Review of National-Level Personal Health Records in Advanced Countries", Healthcare Informatics Research, 27(2), pp.102~109 (2021), 대한의료정보학회
- Lee K, "Digital health profile of South Korea : a cross sectional study", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(10), pp.6329~ (2022)[DOI]
- "Personal health records and the HIPAA privacy rule" (2020)[URL]
- 이유라, "Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications Developed by a Tertiary Hospital as a Tool for Quality Improvement Breakthrough", Healthcare Informatics Research, 21(4), pp.299~306 (2015), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
- "What has changed in 10 years of smartphone era" (2017)[URL]
- Park N, "Factors influencing smartphone use and dependency in South Korea", Comput Human Behav, 29(4), pp.1763~1770 (2023)[DOI]
- Ye J., "The impact of electronic health record-integrated patient-generated health data on clinician burnout", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 28(5), pp.1051~1056 (2021)[DOI]
- Demiris G, "Patient generated health data use in clinical practice : a systematic review", Nurs Outlook, 67(4), pp.311~330 (2019)[DOI]
- Zikmund-Fisher BJ, "Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 24(3), pp.520~528 (2017)[DOI]
- Talboom-Kamp E, "Patients’ attitudes toward an online patient portal for communicating laboratory test results: real-world study using the eHealth impact questionnaire", JMIR Form Res, 4(3), pp.e17060~ (2020)[DOI]
- Irizarry T, "Patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review", J Med Internet Res, 17(6), pp.e148~ (2015)[DOI]
- Ayaz M, "The Fast Health Interoperability Resources(FHIR)standard : systematic literature review of implementations, applications, challenges and opportunities", JMIR Med Inform, 9(7), pp.e21929~ (2021)[DOI]
- "What is PHR (Personal Health Record)?" (2021)[URL]
- Lee K, "Current status of MyData policy and tasks in health and welfare", Health Welf Policy Forum, (301), pp.52~68 (2021)[DOI]
- "Health information exchange system" (2021)[URL]
- "Introduction to the main contents of the amendment to the enforcement decree of the personal information protection act" (2023)[URL]
- "What are the Kanta services?" (2023)[URL]
- "About my health record" (2023)[URL]