Analysis of Platforms and Functions of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Little is known about the platforms and functionalities of mobile-based personal health record (PHR) applications. The objective of this study was to investigate these two features of PHR systems. Methods: The unit of analysis wasgeneral hospitals with more than 100 beds. This study was based on a PHR survey conducted from May 1 to June 30, 2020and the National Health Insurance administrative data as of March 31, 2020. The study considered the platform, Androidand iPhone operation system (iOS), and types of functionalities of PHR systems. Among the 316 target hospitals, 103 hospitalshad adopted PHR systems. A logistic regression analysis was used. Results: This study found that 103 hospitals hadadopted mobile-based PHR systems for their patients. Sixty-four hospitals (62.1%) were adopting both Android and iOS, but36 (35.0%) and 3 (2.9%) hospitals were adopting Android only or iOS only, respectively. The PHR systems of hospitals adoptingboth platforms were more likely to have functions for viewing prescriptions, clinical diagnostic test results, and upcomingappointment status compared to those adopting a single platform (p < 0.001). The number of beds (odds ratio [OR] = 1.004;confidence interval [CI], 1.001–1.007; p = 0.0029) and the number of computed tomography systems (CTs) per 100 beds (OR= 6.350; CI, 1.006–40.084; p = 0.0493) were significantly associated with the adoption of both platforms. Conclusions: Morethan 60% of hospitals had adopted both Android and iOS platforms for their patients in Korea. Hospitals adopting both platformshad additional functionalities and significant association with the number of beds and CTs.
Abstract
Objectives: Little is known about the platforms and functionalities of mobile-based personal health record (PHR) applications. The objective of this study was to investigate these two features of PHR systems. Methods: The unit of analysis wasgeneral hospitals with more than 100 beds. This study was based on a PHR survey conducted from May 1 to June 30, 2020and the National Health Insurance administrative data as of March 31, 2020. The study considered the platform, Androidand iPhone operation system (iOS), and types of functionalities of PHR systems. Among the 316 target hospitals, 103 hospitalshad adopted PHR systems. A logistic regression analysis was used. Results: This study found that 103 hospitals hadadopted mobile-based PHR systems for their patients. Sixty-four hospitals (62.1%) were adopting both Android and iOS, but36 (35.0%) and 3 (2.9%) hospitals were adopting Android only or iOS only, respectively. The PHR systems of hospitals adoptingboth platforms were more likely to have functions for viewing prescriptions, clinical diagnostic test results, and upcomingappointment status compared to those adopting a single platform (p < 0.001). The number of beds (odds ratio [OR] = 1.004;confidence interval [CI], 1.001–1.007; p = 0.0029) and the number of computed tomography systems (CTs) per 100 beds (OR= 6.350; CI, 1.006–40.084; p = 0.0493) were significantly associated with the adoption of both platforms. Conclusions: Morethan 60% of hospitals had adopted both Android and iOS platforms for their patients in Korea. Hospitals adopting both platformshad additional functionalities and significant association with the number of beds and CTs.
참고문헌 (30)
- Lee G, "Which users should be the focus of mobile personal health records? Analysis of user characteristics influencing usage of a tethered mobile personal health record", Telemed J E Health, 22(5), pp.419~428 (2016)
- Jung SY, "Development of comprehensive personal health records integrating patient-generated health data directly from Samsung S-Health and Apple Health apps:retrospective cross-sectional observational study", JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 7(5), pp.e12691~ (2019)
- "Personal health records definition" (2020)[URL]
- Miller H, "Determinants of personal health record use : a large population study at Cleveland Clinic", J Healthc Inf Manag, 21(3), pp.44~48 (2007)
- Osborn CY, "MyHealthAtVanderbilt: policies and procedures governing patient portal functionality", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 18(Suppl 1), pp.i18~i23 (2011)
- Turvey C, "Blue Button use by patients to access and share health record information using the Department of Veterans Affairs' online patient portal", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 21(4), pp.657~663 (2014)
- Bouayad L, "Patient health record systems scope and functionalities : literature review and future directions", J Med Internet Res, 19(11), pp.e388~ (2017)
- Graetz I, "Mobile-accessible personal health records increase the frequency and timeliness of PHR use for patients with diabetes", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 26(1), pp.50~54 (2019)
- Dameff C, "Personal health records : more promising in the smartphone era", JAMA, 321(4), pp.339~340 (2019)
- "An update on Google Health and Google PowerMeter" (2011)[URL]
- "Microsoft HealthVault is officially shutting down in November" (2019)[URL]
- "Apple announces effortless solution bringing health records to iPhone" (2018)[URL]
- "Apple will launch health records feature at 12 hospitals with iOS 11.3" (2018)[URL]
- "Iowa personal health record" (2020)[URL]
- He D, "Security concerns in Android mHealth apps", AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2014, pp.645~654 (2014)
- Sun R, "Information technology platforms: Conceptualisation and a review of emerging research in IS research", Proceedings of the 26th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS) (2015)
- Thomas LD, "Architectural leverage : Putting platforms in context", Acad Manag Perspect, 28(2), pp.198~219 (2014)
- Scott WR, "Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems" (2003), Prentice Hall
- 이윤태, "Association between Electronic Medical Record System Adoption and Healthcare Information Technology Infrastructure", Healthcare Informatics Research, 24(4), pp.327~334 (2018), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
- Menachemi N, "Hospital quality of care: does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care", Health Care Manage Rev, 33(1), pp.51~59 (2008)
- Ford EW, "Personal health record use in the united states: forecasting future adoption levels", J Med Internet Res, 18(3), pp.e73~ (2016)
- Symons JD, "From EHR to PHR : let's get the record straight", BMJ Open, 9(9), pp.e029582~ (2019)
- "Personal health record (PHR) landscape review: final report" (2016)[URL]
- Tang PC, "Personal health records : definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 13(2), pp.121~126 (2006)
- "iPhone vs Android market share" (2019)[URL]
- "Android software developer salary in South Korea" (2020)[URL]
- Price M, "Conditions potentially sensitive to a personal health record(PHR)intervention, a systematic review", BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 15, pp.32~ (2015)
- 박유진, "Understanding Personal Health Record and Facilitating its Market", Healthcare Informatics Research, 26(3), pp.248~250 (2020), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
- Lukkamol Prapkree, "Development and Pilot Testing of the Snackability Smartphone Application to Identify Healthy and Unhealthy Snacks", Healthcare Informatics Research, 25(3), pp.161~172 (2019), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
- Determann D, "Personal health records in the Netherlands : potential user preferences quantified by a discrete choice experiment", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 24(3), pp.529~536 (2017)