On the Status of Conventional Implicature
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper questions the status of conventional implicature in the Gricean theory. In order to scrutinize this generally underargued notion, I take advantage of such sieves as cancelability and detachability, which are the mainstay of differentiating conventional implicature from the other notions like what is said or what is conversationally implicated. Conventional implicatures are said to be non-cancelable and detachable. By looking into such data that have typically been deemed to have conventional implicature as even, but, still and cleft construction, I conclude that the concept of conventional implicature invites reconsideration since it is not well founded.
Abstract
This paper questions the status of conventional implicature in the Gricean theory. In order to scrutinize this generally underargued notion, I take advantage of such sieves as cancelability and detachability, which are the mainstay of differentiating conventional implicature from the other notions like what is said or what is conversationally implicated. Conventional implicatures are said to be non-cancelable and detachable. By looking into such data that have typically been deemed to have conventional implicature as even, but, still and cleft construction, I conclude that the concept of conventional implicature invites reconsideration since it is not well founded.
참고문헌 (24)
- Bach, K, "Conversational Impliciture", Mind and Language, 9, pp.124~162 (1994)
- Bach, K., "The Myth of Conventional Implicature", Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, pp.327~366 (1999)
- Barker, S, "Even, Still and Counterfactuals", Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, pp.1~38 (1991)
- Bennett, J, "Even If", Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, pp.403~418 (1982)
- Boër, S., "The Myth of Semantic Presupposition" (1976), Indiana Linguistics Club
- Cohen, S. M., "Grice: “Logic and Conversation.”", A lecture handout, last modified 11, 2008, pp.2008, ~
- Davis, W. A., "Implicature: Intention, Convention and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Francescotti, R., "Even: The Conventional Implicature Approach Reconsidered", Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, pp.153~173 (1995)
- Grice, P., "Logic and Conversation, In Syntax and Semantics 3", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Grice, P, "Studies in the Way of Words" (1989), Harvard University Press
- Horn, L., "Negative Polarity and the Dynamics of Vertical Inference, In Negation and Polarity: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, In Negation and Polarity: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory", pp.155~ (1997), John Benjamins
- Horn, L., "Implicature, In The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.3~28 (2004), Blackwell
- Karttunen, L., "Conventional Implicature, In Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition", pp.1~56 (1979), Academic Press
- Kay, P, "Even", Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, pp.59~111 (1990)
- König, E, "Temporal and Non-temporal Uses of 'Noch' and 'Schon' in German", Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, pp.173~198 (1977)
- Kreidler, C. W., "Introducing English Semantics" (1998), Routledge
- Lakoff, R., "If's, And's, and But's about Conjunction, In Studies in Linguistic Semantics", pp.115~150 (1971), Holt, Reinhart and Winston
- Levinson, S., "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Lycan, W, "Even and Even If", Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, pp.115~150 (1991)
- Potts, C., "The Logic of Conventional Implicatures", 박사, pp.2003
- "Presupposition and Implicature. A draft chapter for The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory" (2013)[URL]
- Recanati, F, "The Pragmatics of What is Said", Mind and Language, 4, pp.295~329 (1989)
- Rieber, S., "Conventional Implicatures as Tacit Performatives", Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, pp.51~72 (1997)
- Sadock, J. M., "On Testing for Conversational Implicature, In Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics", pp.281~297 (1978), Academic Press