The Potentiality for Actuality Metonymy in English and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the observation Panther and Thornburg (1997) make regarding the exploitation of the POTENTIALITY FOR ACTUALITY metonymy in English and Hungarian, the paper has observed the same metonymy in predicational and illuocutionary domains focusing on Korean data. The result demonstrates that Korean exploits the metonymy systematically in various domains including sense perception, mental process, speech act, action, character disposition, and acquired skills. The prevalence of the metonymy in Korean, which is typologically and genetically unrelated from English and Hungarian, lends support to the idea of universality of the POTENTIALITY FOR ACTUALITY metonymy.
Abstract
Based on the observation Panther and Thornburg (1997) make regarding the exploitation of the POTENTIALITY FOR ACTUALITY metonymy in English and Hungarian, the paper has observed the same metonymy in predicational and illuocutionary domains focusing on Korean data. The result demonstrates that Korean exploits the metonymy systematically in various domains including sense perception, mental process, speech act, action, character disposition, and acquired skills. The prevalence of the metonymy in Korean, which is typologically and genetically unrelated from English and Hungarian, lends support to the idea of universality of the POTENTIALITY FOR ACTUALITY metonymy.
참고문헌 (14)
- Fraser, B., "Hedged performatives, In Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts", pp.187~210 (1975), Academic Press
- Grice, H. P., "Logic and conversation, In Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Kövecses, Z., "Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view", Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), pp.37~77 (1998)
- Lakoff, G., "Women, fire, dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Panther, K.-U., "A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 30(6), pp.755~769 (1998)
- Panther, K.-U., "The Potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian, In Metonymy in language and thought", pp.333~357 (1999), John Benjamins
- Peirsman, Y., "Metonymy as a prototypical category", Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), pp.269~316 (2006)
- Radden, G., "Towards a theory of metonymy, In Metonymy in language and thought", pp.17~59 (1999), John Benjamins
- Searle, J., "Indirect speech acts, In Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts", pp.59~82 (1975), Academic Press
- Thornburg, L., "Speech act metonymies, In Discourse and perspectives in cognitive linguistics", pp.205~219 (1997), John Benjamins
- Truszczyńska, A., "Conceptual metonymy-The problems of boundaries in the light of ICMs", Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 38, pp.221~237 (2002)
- Viberg, Å., "The verbs of perception: A typological study, In Explanations for Language Universals", pp.123~162 (1984), Mouton de Gruyter
- Viberg, Å., "Crosslinguistic perspectives on lexical organization and lexical progressi, In Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic Perspectives", pp.340~379 (1993), University Press