본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Distinct characteristics of the DNA damage response in mammalian oocytes

오정수|Leem Jiyeon|Lee Crystal|Choi Da Yi
생화학분자생물학회 (Korean Society Of Biochemistry And Molecular Biology)|2024.12|Experimental and Molecular Medicine|제56권 |pp. 319-328|DOI 10.1038/s12276-024-01178-2

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류생화학

초록

DNA damage is a critical threat that poses significant challenges to all cells. To address this issue, cells have evolved a sophisticated molecular and cellular process known as the DNA damage response (DDR). Among the various cell types, mammalian oocytes, which remain dormant in the ovary for extended periods, are particularly susceptible to DNA damage. The occurrence of DNA damage in oocytes can result in genetic abnormalities, potentially leading to infertility, birth defects, and even abortion. Therefore, understanding how oocytes detect and repair DNA damage is of paramount importance in maintaining oocyte quality and preserving fertility. Although the fundamental concept of the DDR is conserved across various cell types, an emerging body of evidence reveals striking distinctions in the DDR between mammalian oocytes and somatic cells. In this review, we highlight the distinctive characteristics of the DDR in oocytes and discuss the clinical implications of DNA damage in oocytes.

Abstract

DNA damage is a critical threat that poses significant challenges to all cells. To address this issue, cells have evolved a sophisticated molecular and cellular process known as the DNA damage response (DDR). Among the various cell types, mammalian oocytes, which remain dormant in the ovary for extended periods, are particularly susceptible to DNA damage. The occurrence of DNA damage in oocytes can result in genetic abnormalities, potentially leading to infertility, birth defects, and even abortion. Therefore, understanding how oocytes detect and repair DNA damage is of paramount importance in maintaining oocyte quality and preserving fertility. Although the fundamental concept of the DDR is conserved across various cell types, an emerging body of evidence reveals striking distinctions in the DDR between mammalian oocytes and somatic cells. In this review, we highlight the distinctive characteristics of the DDR in oocytes and discuss the clinical implications of DNA damage in oocytes.

참고문헌 (142)

  1. Abuetabh, Y., "DNA damage response revisited : the p53 family and its regulators provide endless cancer therapy opportunities", Exp. Mol. Med, 54, pp.1658~1669 (2022)
  2. Jackson, S. P., "The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease", Nature, 461, pp.1071~1078 (2009)
  3. Lavin, M. F., "Ataxia-telangiectasia : from a rare disorder to a paradigm for cell signalling and cancer", Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 9, pp.759~769 (2008)
  4. Smits, V. A., "DNA damage control : regulation and functions of checkpoint kinase 1", FEBS J, 282, pp.3681~3692 (2015)
  5. Ciccia, A., "The DNA damage response : making it safe to play with knives", Mol. Cell, 40, pp.179~204 (2010)
  6. Marechal, A., "DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases", Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Biol, 5 (2013)[DOI]
  7. Lee, J. H., "ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex", Science, 308, pp.551~554 (2005)
  8. Smith, J., "The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer", Adv. Cancer Res, 108, pp.73~112 (2010)
  9. Bakkenist, C. J., "DNA damage activates ATM through inter molecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation", Nature, 421, pp.499~506 (2003)
  10. Blackford, A. N., "ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK : the trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response", Mol. Cell, 66, pp.801~817 (2017)
  11. Bartek, J., "Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer", Cancer Cell, 3, pp.421~429 (2003)
  12. Gatei, M., "Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated(ATM)and NBS1-dependent phosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser-317 in response to ionizing radiation", J. Biol. Chem, 278, pp.14806~14811 (2003)
  13. Groth, A., "Human Tousled like kinases are targeted by an ATM-and Chk1dependent DNA damage checkpoint", EMBO J, 22, pp.1676~1687 (2003)
  14. Bucher, N., "G2 checkpoint abrogation and checkpoint kinase-1targeting in the treatment of cancer", Br. J. Cancer, 98, pp.523~528 (2008)
  15. Pelosi, E., "Dynamics of the ovarian reserve and impact of genetic and epidemiological factors on age of menopause", Biol. Reprod, 92, pp.130~ (2015)
  16. Collins, J. K., "DNA damage responses in mammalian oocytes", Reproduction, 152, pp.R15~R22 (2016)
  17. Tease, C., "X-ray-induced chromosome aberrations in dictyate oocytes of young and old female mice", Mutat. Res, 119, pp.191~194 (1983)
  18. Jacquet, P., "Cytogenetic studies in mouse oocytes irradiated in vitro at different stages of maturation, by use of an early preantral follicle culture system", Mutat. Res, 583, pp.168~177 (2005)
  19. Sánchez, F., "Molecular control of oogenesis", Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1822, pp.1896~1912 (2012)
  20. Pepling, M. E., "From primordial germ cell to primordial follicle : mammalian female germ cell development", Genesis, 44, pp.622~632 (2006)
  21. Mayo, K., "Eggs in the nest", Endocrinology, 148, pp.3577~3579 (2007)
  22. Zhang, H., "Cellular and molecular regulation of the activation of mammalian primordial follicles : somatic cells initiate follicle activation in adulthood", Hum. Reprod. Update, 21, pp.779~786 (2015)
  23. Pan, B., "The art of oocyte meiotic arrest regulation", Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol, 17, pp.8~ (2019)
  24. Ohkura, H., "Meiosis: an overview of key differences from mitosis", Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 7 (2015)[DOI]
  25. Patel, J., "Unique geometry of sister kinetochores in human oocytes during meiosis I may explain maternal age associated increases in chromosomal abnormalities", Biol. Open, 5, pp.178~184 (2015)
  26. Schatten, G., "Kinetochore appearance during meiosis, fertilization and mitosis in mouse oocytes and zygotes", Chromosoma, 96, pp.341~352 (1988)
  27. Azoury, J., "Spindle positioning in mouse oocytes relies on a dynamic meshwork of actin filaments", Curr. Biol, 18, pp.1514~1519 (2008)
  28. Bolcun-Filas, E., "Meiosis : the chromosomal foundation of reproduction", Biol. Reprod, 99, pp.112~126 (2018)
  29. Li, R., "The road to maturation : somatic cell interaction and self organization of the mammalian oocyte", Nat. Rev. Mol. cell Biol, 14, pp.141~152 (2013)
  30. Kerr, J. B., "DNA damage-induced primordial follicle oocyte apoptosis and loss of fertility require TAp63-mediated induction of Puma and Noxa", Mol. Cell, 48, pp.343~352 (2012)
  31. Suh, E. K., "p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest", Nature, 444, pp.624~628 (2006)
  32. Stringer, J. M., "Oocytes can efficiently repair DNA double-strand breaks to restore genetic integrity and protect offspring health", Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 117, pp.11513~11522 (2020)
  33. Kerr, J. B., "Cisplatin-induced primordial follicle oocyte killing and loss of fertility are not prevented by imatinib", Nat. Med, 18, pp.1170~1172 (2012)
  34. Lane, D. P., "On the regulation of the p53 tumour suppressor, and its role in the cellular response to DNA damage", Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B : Biol. Sci, 347, pp.83~87 (1995)
  35. Gottlieb, T. M., "p53 and apoptosis", Semin. Cancer Biol, 8, pp.359~368 (1998)
  36. Bolcun-Filas, E., "Reversal of female infertility by Chk2 ablation reveals the oocyte DNA damage checkpoint path way", Science, 343, pp.533~536 (2014)
  37. Yu, H., "Deletion of Puma protects hematopoietic stem cells and confers long-term survival in response to high-dose gamma-irradiation", Blood, 115, pp.3472~3480 (2010)
  38. Allan, L. A., "Apoptosis and autophagy : regulation of caspase-9 by phosphorylation", FEBS J, 276, pp.6063~6073 (2009)
  39. Luan, Y., "TAp63 determines the fate of oocytes against DNA damage", Sci. Adv, 8, pp.eade1846~ (2022)
  40. Stringer, J. M., "The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair", Cell. Mol. Life Sci, 75, pp.2777~2792 (2018)
  41. Cheng, L., "Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication initiator factor Dbf4p", Mol. Cell. Biol, 19, pp.4270~4278 (1999)
  42. Grafi, G., "Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication : the endoreduplication per spective", Exp. Cell Res, 244, pp.372~378 (1998)
  43. Harper, J. V., "The mammalian cell cycle: an overview", Methods Mol. Biol, 296, pp.113~153 (2005)
  44. Campos, A., "Cell cycle and DNA repair regulation in the damage response: protein phosphatases take over the reins", Int. J. Mol. Sci, 21 (2020)[DOI]
  45. Houtgraaf, J. H., "A concise review of DNA damage checkpoints and repair in mammalian cells", Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med, 7, pp.165~172 (2006)
  46. Solc, P., "Prophase I arrest and progression to meta phase I in mouse oocytes : comparison of resumption of meiosis and recovery from G2-arrest in somatic cells", Mol. Hum. Reprod, 16, pp.654~664 (2010)
  47. Mayer, A., "DNA damage response during mouse oocyte maturation", Cell Cycle, 15, pp.546~558 (2016)
  48. Carroll, J., "The DNA damage response in mammalian oocytes", Front Genet, 4, pp.117~ (2013)
  49. Marangos, P., "DNA damage-induced metaphase I arrest is mediated by the spindle assembly checkpoint and maternal age", Nat. Commun, 6, pp.8706~ (2015)
  50. Marangos, P., "Oocytes progress beyond prophase in the presence of DNA damage", Curr. Biol, 22, pp.989~994 (2012)
  51. Wang, H., "DNA double-strand breaks disrupted the spindle assembly in porcine oocytes", Mol. Reprod. Dev, 83, pp.132~143 (2016)
  52. Remillard-Labrosse, "Human oocytes harboring damaged DNA can complete meiosis I", Fertil. Steril, 113, pp.1080~1089 (2020)
  53. Leem, J., "WIP1 phosphatase suppresses the DNA damage response during G2", prophase arrest in mouse oocytes, 2018, pp.99, 798~805
  54. Macurek, L., "Downregulation of Wip1 phosphatase modulates the cellular threshold of DNA damage signaling in mitosis", Cell Cycle, 12, pp.251~262 (2013)
  55. Subramanian, G. N., "Oocytes mount a noncanonical DNA damage response involving APC-Cdh1-mediated proteolysis", J. Cell Biol, 219 (2020)[DOI]
  56. Leem, J., "MDC1 is essential for G2", M transition and spindle assembly in mouse oocytes, 2022, pp.79, 200~
  57. Sun, M. H., "Cumulus cells block oocyte meiotic resumption via gap junc tions in cumulus oocyte complexes subjected to DNA double-strand breaks", PLoS ONE, 10, pp.e0143223~ (2015)
  58. Yuen, W. S., "DNA double strand breaks but not interstrand crosslinks prevent progress through meiosis in fully grown mouse oocytes", PLoS ONE, 7, pp.e43875~ (2012)
  59. Collins, J. K., "DNA damage induces a meiotic arrest in mouse oocytes mediated by the spindle assembly checkpoint", Nat. Commun, 6, pp.8553~ (2015)
  60. Yu, R. B. H., "The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer", Oncogene, 23, pp.2016~2027 (2004)
  61. Jallepalli, P. V., "Chromosome segregation and cancer: cutting through the mystery", Nat. Rev. Cancer, 1, pp.109~117 (2001)
  62. Lara-Gonzalez, P., "Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores", Semin. Cell Dev. Biol, 117, pp.86~98 (2021)
  63. Lane, S. I., "Timing of anaphase-promoting complex acti vation in mouse oocytes is predicted by microtubule-kinetochore attachment but not by bivalent alignment or tension", Development, 139, pp.1947~1955 (2012)
  64. Lane, S. I. R., "DNA damage induces a kinetochore-based ATM", ATR-inde pendent SAC arrest unique to the first meiotic division in mouse oocytes, 2017, pp.144, 3475~3486
  65. Peters, J.-M., "The anaphase promoting complex", cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy, 2006, pp.7, 644~656
  66. Blengini, C. S., "A field guide to Aurora kinase inhibitors: an oocyte perspective", Reproduction, 164, pp.V5~V7 (2022)
  67. Tachibana-Konwalski, K., "Spindle assembly checkpoint of oocytes depends on a kinetochore structure determined by cohesin in meiosis I", Curr. Biol, 23, pp.2534~2539 (2013)
  68. Blengini, C. S., "Age-dependent integrity of the meiotic spindle assembly checkpoint in females requires Aurora kinase B", Aging Cell, 20, pp.e13489~ (2021)
  69. Giunta, S., "DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis", J. Cell Biol, 190, pp.197~207 (2010)
  70. Rieder, C. L., "Entry into mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells is guarded by a chromosome damage checkpoint that reverses the cell cycle when trig gered during early but not late prophase", J. Cell Biol, 142, pp.1013~1022 (1998)
  71. Bakhoum, S. F., "Mitotic DNA damage response: at the crossroads of structural and numerical cancer chromosome instabilities", Trends Cancer, 3, pp.225~234 (2017)
  72. Nelson, G., "DNA damage foci in mitosis are devoid of 53BP1", Cell Cycle, 8, pp.3379~3383 (2009)
  73. Leimbacher, P. A., "MDC1 interacts with TOPBP1 to maintain chromosomal stability during mitosis", Mol. Cell, 74, pp.571~583 (2019)
  74. van Vugt, M. A., "A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G(2)", M DNA damage checkpoint, 2010, pp.8, e1000287~
  75. Benada, J., "Polo-like kinase 1inhibits DNA damage response during mitosis", Cell Cycle, 14, pp.219~231 (2015)
  76. Orthwein, A., "Mitosis inhibits DNA double-strand break repair to guard against telomere fusions", Science, 344, pp.189~193 (2014)
  77. Leem, J., "Oocytes can repair DNA damage during meiosis via a microtubule-dependent recruitment of CIP2A-MDC1-TOPBP1 complex from spindle pole to chromosomes", Nucleic Acids Res, 51, pp.4899~4913 (2023)
  78. Lee, C., "Selective utilization of non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination for DNA repair during meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes", Cell Prolif, 56, pp.e13384~ (2023)
  79. Martin, J. H., "Double strand break DNA repair occurs via non-homologous end-joining in mouse MII oocytes", Sci. Rep, 8, pp.9685~ (2018)
  80. Hefferin, M. L., "Mechanism of DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end joining", DNA Repair(Amst. ), 4, pp.639~648 (2005)
  81. Taleei, R., "The non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) mathematical model for the repair of double-strand breaks:II. Application to damage induced by ultrasoft X rays and low-energy electrons", Radiat. Res, 179, pp.540~548 (2013)
  82. Jasin, M., "Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination", Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol, 5, pp.a012740~ (2013)
  83. Xu, Y., "Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks", Essays Biochem, 64, pp.765~777 (2020)
  84. Shrivastav, M., "Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice", Cell Res, 18, pp.134~147 (2007)
  85. Burma, S., "Role of non-homologous end joining(NHEJ)in maintaining genomic integrity", DNA Repair, 5, pp.1042~1048 (2006)
  86. Li, X., "Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance", Cell Res, 18, pp.99~113 (2008)
  87. Mazón G., "SnapShot: Homologous recombination in DNA double-strand break repair", Cell, 142, pp.006~ (2010)[DOI]
  88. Zhao, F., "DNA end resection and its role in DNA replication and DSB repair choice in mammalian cells", Exp. Mol. Med, 52, pp.1705~1714 (2020)
  89. Lin, Y., "Multiple pathways for repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian chromosomes", Mol. Cell. Biol, 19, pp.8353~8360 (1999)
  90. Yilmaz, D., "Activation of homologous recombination in G1 preserves centromeric integrity", Nature, 600, pp.748~753 (2021)
  91. Symington, L. S., "Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice", Annu. Rev. Genet, 45, pp.247~271 (2011)
  92. William, S., "Interaction of Ku protein and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit with nucleic acids", Nucleic Acids Res, 26, pp.1551~1559 (1998)
  93. Pierce, A. J., "Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells", Genes Dev, 15, pp.3237~3242 (2001)
  94. McVey, M., "MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks(director’s cut) : deleted sequences and alternative endings", Trends Genet, 24, pp.529~538 (2008)
  95. Dion, V., "Chromatin movement in the maintenance of genome stability", Cell, 152, pp.1355~1364 (2013)
  96. Hauer, M. H., "Chromatin and nucleosome dynamics in DNA damage and repair", Genes Dev, 31, pp.2204~2221 (2017)
  97. Dion, V., "Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombi nation machinery", Nat. Cell Biol, 14, pp.502~509 (2012)
  98. Mine-Hattab, J., "Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination", Nat. Cell Biol, 14, pp.510~517 (2012)
  99. Foley, E. A., "Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly check point signalling at the kinetochore", Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 14, pp.25~37 (2013)
  100. Matkovic, J., "Kinetochore-and chromosome-driven transition of micro tubules into bundles promotes spindle assembly", Nat. Commun, 13, pp.7307~ (2022)
  101. Shokrollahi, M., "Interphase microtubules in nuclear organization and genome maintenance", Trends Cell Biol, 31, pp.721~731 (2021)
  102. Galletta, B. J., "Actin dynamics and endocytosis in yeast and mammals", Curr. Opin. Biotechnol, 21, pp.604~610 (2010)
  103. Lesca, C., "DNA damage induce gamma-tubulin-RAD51 nuclear complexes in mammalian cells", Oncogene, 24, pp.5165~5172 (2005)
  104. Petsalaki, E., "DNA damage response proteins regulating mitotic cell division : double agents preserving genome stability", FEBS J, 287, pp.1700~1721 (2020)
  105. Roeles, J., "Actin-microtubule interplay coordinates spindle assembly in human oocytes", Nat. Commun, 10, pp.4651~ (2019)
  106. "Elife", 2015, e07735~
  107. Wang, H., "Structural damage to meiotic chromosomes impairs DNA recombination and checkpoint control in mammalian oocytes", J. Cell Biol, 173, pp.485~495 (2006)
  108. Greaney, J., "Regulation of chromosome segregation in oocytes and the cellular basis for female meiotic errors", Hum. Reprod. Update, 24, pp.135~161 (2018)
  109. Mikwar, M., "Mechanisms of oocyte aneuploidy associated with advanced maternal age", Mutat. Res Rev. Mutat. Res, 785, pp.108320~ (2020)
  110. Zielinska, A. P., "Meiotic kinetochores fragment into multiple lobes upon cohesin loss in aging eggs", Curr. Biol, 29, pp.3749~3765 (2019)
  111. de Sousa Lopes, S., "An overview on the diversity of cellular organelles during the germ cell cycle", Histol. Histopathol, 25, pp.267~276 (2010)
  112. van der Reest, J., "Mito chondria: their relevance during oocyte ageing", Ageing Res Rev, 70, pp.101378~ (2021)
  113. Zhang, D., "Mitochondria in oocyte aging : current understanding", Facts Views Vis. Obgyn, 9, pp.29~38 (2017)
  114. Matthews, M. L., "Cancer, fertility preservation, and future pregnancy : a comprehensive review", Obstet. Gynecol. Int, 2012, pp.953937~ (2012)
  115. Ojo, A. S., "Global uptake of fertility preservation by women undergoing cancer treatment: An unmet need in low to high-income countries", Cancer Epidemiol, 79, pp.102189~ (2022)
  116. Balaban, R. S., "Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging", Cell, 120, pp.483~495 (2005)
  117. Cenini, G., "Oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in neurodegenerative diseases : from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapies", Oxid. Med Cell Longev, 2020, pp.1270256~ (2020)
  118. Chappel, S., "The role of mitochondria from mature oocyte to viable blastocyst", Obstet. Gynecol. Int, 2013, pp.183024~ (2013)
  119. Ferreira, A. F., "Does supplementation with mitochondria improve oocyte competence? A systematic review", Reproduction, 161, pp.269~287 (2021)
  120. Fogleman, S., "CRISPR", Cas9 and mitochondrial gene replacement therapy : promising techniques and ethical considerations, 2016, pp.5, 39~52
  121. Khan, S. M., "Development of mitochondrial gene replacement therapy", J. Bioenerg. Biomembr, 36, pp.387~393 (2004)
  122. Labarta, E., "Mito chondria as a tool for oocyte rejuvenation", Fertil. Steril, 111, pp.219~226 (2019)
  123. Mok, B. Y., "A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing", Nature, 583, pp.631~637 (2020)
  124. St John, J. C., "Transmission, inheritance and replication of mitochondrial DNA in mammals : implications for reproductive processes and infertility", Cell Tissue Res, 349, pp.795~808 (2012)
  125. Van Blerkom, J., "Mitochondrial function in the human oocyte and embryo and their role in developmental competence", Mitochondrion, 11, pp.797~813 (2011)
  126. Agarwal, A., "Role of oxidative stress in female repro duction", Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol, 3, pp.28~ (2005)
  127. Lord, T., "Oxidative stress and ageing of the post-ovulatory oocyte", Reproduction, 146, pp.R217~R227 (2013)
  128. Ruder, E. H., "Oxidative stress and antioxidants : exposure and impact on female fertility", Hum. Reprod. Update, 14, pp.345~357 (2008)
  129. Menezo, Y., "Modulating oxidative stress and epigenetic homeostasis in preimplantation IVF embryos", Zygote, 30, pp.149~158 (2022)
  130. Ramos-Ibeas, P., "Embryo responses to stress induced by assisted repro ductive technologies", Mol. Reprod. Dev, 86, pp.1292~1306 (2019)
  131. Uppangala, S., "In vitro matured oocytes are more susceptible than in vivo matured oocytes to mock ICSI induced functional and genetic changes", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0119735~ (2015)
  132. Liu, N., "l-Proline improves the cytoplasmic maturation of mouse oocyte by regulating glutathione-related redox homeostasis", Theriogenology, 195, pp.159~167 (2023)
  133. Lord, T., "Melatonin prevents postovulatory oocyte aging in the mouse and extends the window for optimal fertilization in vitro", Biol. Reprod, 88, pp.67~ (2013)
  134. Nikmard, F., "The boosting effects of melatonin on the expression of related genes to oocyte maturation and antioxidant pathways : a polycystic ovary syn drome-mouse model", J. Ovarian Res, 15, pp.11~ (2022)
  135. Zhang, H., "Melatonin improves the quality of maternally aged oocytes by maintaining intercellular communication and antioxidant metabolite supply", Redox Biol, 49, pp.102215~ (2022)
  136. Asadi, E., "Effect of vitamin e on oocytes apoptosis in nicotine-treated mice", Iran. J. Basic Med Sci, 15, pp.880~884 (2012)
  137. Liu, M. J., "Resveratrol improves in vitro maturation of oocytes in aged mice and humans", Fertil. Steril, 109, pp.900~907 (2018)
  138. Romero, S., "Coenzyme Q10 improves the in vitro maturation of oocytes exposed to the intrafollicular environment of patients on fertility treatment", JBRA Assist Reprod, 24, pp.283~288 (2020)
  139. Leem, J., "Increased WIP1 expression with aging suppresses the capacity of oocytes to respond to and repair DNA damage", Front Cell Dev. Biol, 9, pp.810928~ (2021)
  140. Leem, J., "The capacity to repair sperm DNA damage in zygotes is enhanced by inhibiting WIP1 activity", Front Cell Dev. Biol, 10, pp.841327~ (2022)
  141. Fernandez-Diez, C., "Impact of sperm DNA damage and oocyte-repairing capacity on trout development", Reproduction, 152, pp.57~67 (2016)
  142. Marchetti, F., "Disruption of maternal DNA repair increases sperm-derived chromosomal aberrations", Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, pp.17725~17729 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

DNA damage repair is suppressed in porcine aged oocytesDong Il Jin, Jae-Eun Lee, Ling Sun, So Yeon Kim, Tao Lin한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2021 · 제63권 제5호Consequences of chemotherapeutic agents on primordial follicles and future clinical applications조금준, John S. Davis, So-Youn Kim대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2019 · 제62권 제6호Transcriptional regulation and chromatin dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks조혜성, Heo Yungyeong, Ji Jae-Hoon, Min Sunwoo생화학분자생물학회 · Experimental and Molecular Medicine2022 · 제54권 Multiple Roles of BRIT1/MCPH1 in DNA Damage Response, DNA Repair, and Cancer SuppressionKaiyi Li, Shiaw-Yih Lin, Yulong Liang연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2010 · 제51권 제3호Mec1 Modulates Interhomolog Crossover and Interplays with Tel1 at Post Double-Strand Break Stages강현아, 김근필, 이민수, 주정환, 최형석한국미생물·생명공학회 · Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology2020 · 제30권 제3호Hallmarks of cellular senescence: biology, mechanisms, regulationsAjoolabady Amir, Bahijri Suhad, Pratico Domenico, Ren Jun, Tuomilehto Jaakko, Uversky Vladimir N.생화학분자생물학회 · Experimental and Molecular Medicine2025 · 제57권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (218건)

Big data and deep learning for RNA biologyJeon Hyeonseong, Baek Daehyun, Hwang Hyeonseo, Yeo Nagyeongpp. 1-29RGS19 activates the MYH9/β-catenin/c-Myc positive feedback loop in hepatocellular carcinomaXu Yanan, Ke Shanjia, Lu Shounan, Bai Miaoyu, Yu Hongjun, Yin Bing, Wang Chaoqun, Feng Zhigang, Li Zihao, Huang Jingjing, Li Xinglong, Qian Baolin, Hua Yongliang, Fu Yao, Sun Bei, Wu Yaohua, Ma Yongpp. 1-14Molecular mechanisms of circular RNA translationKim Yoon Ki, Hwang Hyun Jungpp. 1-9The m6A writer RBM15 drives the growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells through the stimulation of serine and glycine metabolismKim Ho, Yun Hye Jin, 이종호, Lee Su Bin, Kim Seok-Ho, Park Yun-Yong, Park Su Hwan, Ju Jin-Sung, Woo Hyunmin, Győrffy Balázs, Kim Eun-jeong, Han Hee Dong, Eyun Seong-ilpp. 1-15Neuron type-specific optogenetic stimulation for differential stroke recovery in chronic capsular infarctKim Ra Gyung, Cho Jongwook, Park Ji-Young, Kim Young Ro, Lee Min-Cheol, Kim Hyoung-Ihlpp. 1-11
원문 보기