본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Leadership in Design Management by Prentice Hall's Self-Assessment

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

This paper compares and contrasts four different kinds of leadership models in Design Management. Similarities and differences between these four models in contemporary leadership issues and challenges are analyzed and described. Each model will demonstrate the effects of leadership and how these leaders use the different approaches to develop their leadership style in their design field. This paper proposes that contemporary leadership in Design Management involves a unique bonding among leaders and followers, and more flexible and developed leadership will continue in the understanding and skill with which applying to the dynamic of organization change. The results and application of each model’s assessment indicate a team of leaders that are capable of achieving excellence through their combined talents and vision to achieve in design fields using their potential inability of their own leadership.

Abstract

This paper compares and contrasts four different kinds of leadership models in Design Management. Similarities and differences between these four models in contemporary leadership issues and challenges are analyzed and described. Each model will demonstrate the effects of leadership and how these leaders use the different approaches to develop their leadership style in their design field. This paper proposes that contemporary leadership in Design Management involves a unique bonding among leaders and followers, and more flexible and developed leadership will continue in the understanding and skill with which applying to the dynamic of organization change. The results and application of each model’s assessment indicate a team of leaders that are capable of achieving excellence through their combined talents and vision to achieve in design fields using their potential inability of their own leadership.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. B. J. Avolio, "Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead" (2002), Emerald
  2. W. Antonia, "Managing Editor. Managing design in SMEs", DMI Review Article, 20(3) (2009)
  3. B. M. Bass, "Does the transactional-transformation leadership paradigm transcend organizational boundaries?", American Psychologist, 52(2), pp.130~139 (1997)
  4. "Bass & Stogdill The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, & managerial applications (4th ed.)" (1990), The Free Press
  5. J. Chen, "Leadership effectiveness, leadership style and employee readiness" (2005), ProQuest
  6. J. G. Clawson, "Level three leadership: Getting below the surface. (3rd ed.)" (2006), Pearson
  7. F. E. Fiedler, "A contingency model of leadership, effectiveness. in Advances in experimental social psychology" (1964), Academic Press
  8. R. K. Greenleaf, "The servant as leader. in Business leadership: A Jossey-Bass reader" (1977), John Wiley & Sons
  9. W. Hill, "A situational approach to leadership effectiveness", Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(6), pp.513~517 (1969)
  10. A. Nahavandi, "The art and science of leadership (5th ed.)" (2009), Pearson Prentice Hall
  11. Pearson Education, "?" (2007), Pearson Prentice Hall
  12. Bruce W. Tuckman, "Development Sequence in Small Groups", Psychological Bulletin, 63(6) (1995)
  13. K. Strang, "Examining effective and ineffective transformational project leadership", Team Performance Management, 11(3), pp.68~ (2005)
  14. J. T. Wren, "The leader's companion: Insights on leadership through the ages" (1995), The Free Press
  15. G. Yukl, "Leadership in organizations (7th ed.)" (2010), Pearson
  16. L. Thomas, "How to become a more design-minded organization", DMI Review Article, 20(3) (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)