동조적 행위로서 정보교환과 독점규제법상 합의 -서울고등법원 2013. 7. 17 선고 2012누2346 판결을 중심으로-
Relationship Between Information Exchange as a Concerted Practice and Agreement in Cartel
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently exchange of information became an issue because of the several high court’s ruling about exchange of information and concerted practices which is in the Article 101(1) of TFEU. With regard to th definition of a concerted practice, the Court has held that such a practice is a form of coordination between undertakings by which , without it having been taken to the stage where an agreement properly so-called has been concluded, practical cooperation between them is knowingly substituted for the risks of competition. And it follows, first, that the concept of a concerted practice, as it results from the actual terms of Article 101(1) TFEU, implies, besides undertakings’ concerting with each other, subsequent conduct on the market, and a relationship of cause and effect between the two. Because concerted practice is but no more than an “conduct of operator”, it cannot be identified as “agreement” from the actual terms of Article 19 Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act. In the concept of concerted action, the exchange of information can be assumed as an agreement of Article 19 Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act under certain conditions, which are related to market conditions and characteristics of the information exchange.
Abstract
Recently exchange of information became an issue because of the several high court’s ruling about exchange of information and concerted practices which is in the Article 101(1) of TFEU. With regard to th definition of a concerted practice, the Court has held that such a practice is a form of coordination between undertakings by which , without it having been taken to the stage where an agreement properly so-called has been concluded, practical cooperation between them is knowingly substituted for the risks of competition. And it follows, first, that the concept of a concerted practice, as it results from the actual terms of Article 101(1) TFEU, implies, besides undertakings’ concerting with each other, subsequent conduct on the market, and a relationship of cause and effect between the two. Because concerted practice is but no more than an “conduct of operator”, it cannot be identified as “agreement” from the actual terms of Article 19 Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act. In the concept of concerted action, the exchange of information can be assumed as an agreement of Article 19 Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act under certain conditions, which are related to market conditions and characteristics of the information exchange.
참고문헌 (28)
- 권오승, "경제법" (2013), 법문사
- 권오승, "독점규제법", 홍문사
- 권오승, "독점규제법 30년" (2011), 법문사
- 신동권, "독점규제법" (2011), 박영사
- 이호영, "독점규제법" (2010), 법문사
- 김성훈, "추정조항 적용 요건으로서 행위의 외형상 일치", 경제법판례연구, 3 (2006), 법문사
- 박해식, "부당한 공동행위의 추정과 실질적 경쟁제한의 의미", 경제법판례연구, 1 (2004), 법문사
- 이기종, "카르텔 조장수단에 대한 공정거래법상의 규제", 연세법학 (2001)
- 이선희, "독점규제법상 부당한 공동행위에 있어서 합의의 개념과 입증", 서울대학교 법학, 52(3), pp.415~448 (2011), 법학연구소
- 이봉의, "부당한 공동행위와 합의 도그마의 문제점", 경제법판례연구, 2 (2005), 경제법판례연구회
- 부당공동행위 및 사업자단체금지행위 관련 심결정리 및 분석, "이봉의", 공정거래위원회, ~ (2007)
- 이호영, "독점금지법상 ‘합의의 도그마’에 대한 저항", 경쟁법연구, 12 (2005), 한국경제법학회
- 유해용, "부당공동행위 추정과 관련된 판례 연구(上)", 저스티스, (88), pp.107~146 (2005), 한국법학원
- 유해용, "부당공동행위 추정과 관련된 판례 연구(下)", 저스티스, (89), pp.58~86 (2006), 한국법학원
- 홍대식, "공정거래법상 카르텔 규제의 쟁점 -실체법적 쟁점을 중심으로-", 규제연구, 19(2), pp.105~136 (2010), 한국규제학회
- 유해용, "과점시장에서의 합의의 추정과 그 번복", 경제법판례연구, 1 (2004), 경제법판례연구회, 법문사
- 홍명수, "정보 교환과 카르텔 규제", 법과사회, (36), pp.277~299 (2009), 법과사회이론학회
- 홍명수, "카르텔 규제의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 고찰", 경쟁법연구, 11 (2005), 한국경제법학회
- 홍탁균, "부당한 공동행위 합의 입증의 문제", 경쟁법연구, 23, pp.39~94 (2011), 한국경쟁법학회
- 한승혁, "정보교환행위와 공동행위의 관계", 경쟁저널, (170) (2013), 공정경쟁연합회
- American Bar Association, "Antitrust Law Development", ~ (2012)
- Herbert Hovenkamp, "Federal Antitrust Policy, In The Law of Competition and its Practice(4th Ed)", pp.2011, Thompson
- Ioannis Lianos, "Handbook on EU Competition Law - Substantive Aspects" (2013), Edward Elgar Publishing
- OECD, "Information Exchanges between Competitors under Competition Law", DAF, 2010
- Richard Whish, "Competition Law(7th ed)" (2012)
- Richard Posner, "Antitrust Law(2nd ed.)" (2001), Chicago University Press
- Ioannis Lianos, "Collusion in Vertical Relations Under Article 81 EC", Common Market Law Review, 45(4) (2008)
- William H. Page, "Communication and Concerted Action", Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 38(405) (2007)