본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

20세기 초 중국지식인의 ‘國民性’ 인식 - 『中國人的性格』과 『中國人的精神』을 중심으로-

Chinese Intellectuals’ Perception of ‘National Character’ in The Early 20th Century - Comparaing 『Chinese Characteristics』with 『The Spirit of the Chinese People』-

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study aims to provide an academic inquiry of chinese intellectuals’ different perception of ‘national character’ in the early 20th century when China was about to enter the first stage of nation-state building. For a meaningful inquiry, this study compared two academically important books: one book was written by Arther H. Smith(1845~1932), 『Chinese Characteristics』which described Chinese national characteristics based on his life experience in China for 22 years, and the other written by Gu Hongming(1857~1928), 『The Spirit of the Chinese People』, which focused on Chinese cultural pride. This study also investigated Chinese enlightenment -intellectuals’ comments on the two polemical books. This study found that there were different perception of ‘national character’ among three different intellectuals, foreign investigators, Chinese intellectuals with European experience, and Chinese intellectuals without such experience. According to the results of comparative analysis, there was obvious meaningful difference regarding to the concept between ‘national character’ and ‘國民性-Guo min xing’. In particular, the meaning of ‘national character’ perceived by Chinese intellectuals seemed to have chronological aspect like historians’ evaluation of a certain generation. For the first time, the concept of ‘national character’ was used by Chinese intellectuals in the last period of Chin dynasty to provide a unique, but Chinese centered, theoretical tradition that would be helpful to transform China into a modern nation-state. In other words, a certain ethinic people’s national character could have a positive or negative tendency based on such peoples’ own perception of what kind of nation-state they wanted to build. In this context, Chinese intellectuals looked out for diverse ideal types of nation-state and uniqueness of Chinese national character. Therefore, the discourse of ‘national character’ as an academic concept seems not to be done in the 21th century.

Abstract

This study aims to provide an academic inquiry of chinese intellectuals’ different perception of ‘national character’ in the early 20th century when China was about to enter the first stage of nation-state building. For a meaningful inquiry, this study compared two academically important books: one book was written by Arther H. Smith(1845~1932), 『Chinese Characteristics』which described Chinese national characteristics based on his life experience in China for 22 years, and the other written by Gu Hongming(1857~1928), 『The Spirit of the Chinese People』, which focused on Chinese cultural pride. This study also investigated Chinese enlightenment -intellectuals’ comments on the two polemical books. This study found that there were different perception of ‘national character’ among three different intellectuals, foreign investigators, Chinese intellectuals with European experience, and Chinese intellectuals without such experience. According to the results of comparative analysis, there was obvious meaningful difference regarding to the concept between ‘national character’ and ‘國民性-Guo min xing’. In particular, the meaning of ‘national character’ perceived by Chinese intellectuals seemed to have chronological aspect like historians’ evaluation of a certain generation. For the first time, the concept of ‘national character’ was used by Chinese intellectuals in the last period of Chin dynasty to provide a unique, but Chinese centered, theoretical tradition that would be helpful to transform China into a modern nation-state. In other words, a certain ethinic people’s national character could have a positive or negative tendency based on such peoples’ own perception of what kind of nation-state they wanted to build. In this context, Chinese intellectuals looked out for diverse ideal types of nation-state and uniqueness of Chinese national character. Therefore, the discourse of ‘national character’ as an academic concept seems not to be done in the 21th century.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Arthur H. Smith, "中國人的性格" (1998), 學苑出版社
  2. 辜鴻銘, "中國人的精神" (2007), 海南出版社
  3. 沙蓮香, "中國民族性 (一)ㆍ(二)" (1988), 中國人民大學出版社
  4. 魯迅, "魯迅全集 第1, 3, 4, 6卷" (1981), 人民出版社
  5. 陈独秀, "陈独秀文章选编, 上" (1984), 三聯書店
  6. 陳菘, "五四前后東西文化問題論戰問问選" (1985), 中國社会科学出版社
  7. Arthur H. Smith, "중국인의 특성" (2006), 경향미디어
  8. 辜鴻銘, "중국인의 정신" (2004), 예담China
  9. Lidia H Liu, "언어횡단적 실천" (2005), 소명출판사
  10. 소노다 시케토, "중국인 이렇게 생각하고 행동한다" (2002), 다락원
  11. 栢陽, "추악한 중국인" (2005), 도서출판 창해
  12. 신승하, "20세기의 중국" (1998), 서울대학교출판부
  13. 盧東善, "中國文化의 價値體系와 民族性硏究 試論", 中國硏究, (14) (1993), 韓國外大, 中國學硏究所
  14. 鄭錫元, "中國 國民性 硏究-‘關係(Guan-Xi)의 出現背景", 중소연구, 23(3) (1999), 한양대 아태연구센타
  15. 김병호, "전통가치관과 국민성", 사회발전연구, 12 (1996), 연세대 사회발전연구소
  16. 方小教, "鲁迅與陳獨秀“國民性”思想之比較", 安徽史学, (4) (1990), 安徽教育学院政教系
  17. 吳艷華, "“國民性”:一個个持久性話題", 山東社會科學, (6) (2003), 河北滄州師範專科學校
  18. 俞祖華, "近代來華华西方人對中國國民性的評析", 東岳論叢, 23(1) (2002), 烟台師範學院歷史與历社會學系
  19. 俞祖華, "近代日本人對中國國民性的評說", 烟台師範學院報, 19(1) (2002), 烟台師範學院歷史與历社會學系
  20. 扬玉好, "審視中國民族性格的两种目光", 烟台師範學院報, 17(4) (2000), 烟台師範學院歷史與历社會學系
  21. 鄧天玉, "鲁迅與史密斯論中國國民性之比較", 沙洋師範高等專科學校學報, (2) (2003), 沙洋師專人文系

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (30건)