농민 츄쥐는 어떻게 중화인민공화국 국민이 되었는가? - 영화 『츄쥐의 소송(秋菊打官司)』 프리퀄 탐색
How the Qiu Ju farmers become national subjects in the People’s Republic of China: A prequel of the film, The Story of Qiu Ju
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The particularity of the Chinese Revolution is widely accepted by scholars. Unlike the revolutions of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, it was a land reform movement combined with a farmers’ revolution. The premises leading to such results, however, still remain unanswered. One of the most important questions is how to understand ‘farmers’ within China. I propose to approach the question from several perspectives. First, we need to think about what it meant to be a farmer in the Chinese tradition; what land reform meant for them; and how they were transformed in the process. Some may argue that these issues have been sufficiently addressed. Through land reform farmers ascended as the key player in the Chinese Revolution and the success of that reform ultimately brought Socialism to China as the dominant ideology. In order to gain a thorough understanding, I argue, it is imperative to go one step further and discuss in what context land reform was implemented and what concrete changes it generated among Chinese farmers. Second, we need to ask how Chinese farmers converted to Socialism, an ideology that was at odds with their traditional identity and profits. What was at the core of their agency during that conversion? And what was the source of the energy that ended up creating ‘reverse direction flow’ since China’s reform and opening. Unless we can answer these questions, we run into a contradiction that the Chinese Revolution was farmers’ revolution in its essence, but the outcome of that revolution ushered in Socialism. An inquiry of such questions will help us understand the so-called “Three Rural Problems”, a rising issue in contemporary China. This article is a re-examination of assumptions related to the Chinese Revolution initiated by farmers. As a departure point, this study employs The Story of Qiu Ju, directed by Zhang Yimou. The Story of Qiu Ju illustrates in realistic detail China’s agrarian society and the changes experienced by farmers since China’s reform and opening. The focus of the current article is the historical background that precedes the temporal setting of the film. That is, it examines the historical journey of Qiu Ju and other characters depicted in the film, offering to serve as a ‘prequel’ of the film, The Story of Qiu Ju.
Abstract
The particularity of the Chinese Revolution is widely accepted by scholars. Unlike the revolutions of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, it was a land reform movement combined with a farmers’ revolution. The premises leading to such results, however, still remain unanswered. One of the most important questions is how to understand ‘farmers’ within China. I propose to approach the question from several perspectives. First, we need to think about what it meant to be a farmer in the Chinese tradition; what land reform meant for them; and how they were transformed in the process. Some may argue that these issues have been sufficiently addressed. Through land reform farmers ascended as the key player in the Chinese Revolution and the success of that reform ultimately brought Socialism to China as the dominant ideology. In order to gain a thorough understanding, I argue, it is imperative to go one step further and discuss in what context land reform was implemented and what concrete changes it generated among Chinese farmers. Second, we need to ask how Chinese farmers converted to Socialism, an ideology that was at odds with their traditional identity and profits. What was at the core of their agency during that conversion? And what was the source of the energy that ended up creating ‘reverse direction flow’ since China’s reform and opening. Unless we can answer these questions, we run into a contradiction that the Chinese Revolution was farmers’ revolution in its essence, but the outcome of that revolution ushered in Socialism. An inquiry of such questions will help us understand the so-called “Three Rural Problems”, a rising issue in contemporary China. This article is a re-examination of assumptions related to the Chinese Revolution initiated by farmers. As a departure point, this study employs The Story of Qiu Ju, directed by Zhang Yimou. The Story of Qiu Ju illustrates in realistic detail China’s agrarian society and the changes experienced by farmers since China’s reform and opening. The focus of the current article is the historical background that precedes the temporal setting of the film. That is, it examines the historical journey of Qiu Ju and other characters depicted in the film, offering to serve as a ‘prequel’ of the film, The Story of Qiu Ju.
참고문헌 (16)
- 공상철, "秋菊은 어떻게 ‘골칫거리’가 되었는가 ― 張藝謀의『秋菊打官司』를 고쳐 읽으며", 중국현대문학, (75), pp.69~92 (2015), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 김도경, "중국 토지 제도를 보는 두 개의 시각: 허쉐펑(賀雪峰)과 저우치런(周其仁) 간의 논쟁을 중심으로", 현대중국연구, 16(1), pp.411~446 (2014), 현대중국학회
- 리쩌허우, "중국현대사상사론" (2005), 한길사
- 모리스 마이스너, "마오의 중국과 그 이후1" (2004), 이산
- 미조구치 유조, "중국의 공과 사" (2004), 신서원
- 성근제, "모택동의 ‘후진성 우위론’에 대하여", 중국현대문학, (20) (2001)
- 왕후이, "탈정치시대의 정치" (2014), 돌베개
- 원톄쥔, "백년의 급진" (2013), 돌베개
- 이정훈, "장이모우(張藝謀) 영화 속의 농촌과 ‘농촌문제’ ― 영화 「귀주이야기」를 중심으로", 중국현대문학, (46), pp.65~92 (2008), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 조승래, "공화국을 위하여: 공화주의의 형성과정과 핵심사상" (2010), 길
- 존 로크, "통치론: 시민정부의 참된 기원, 범위 및 그 목적에 관한 시론" (1996), 까치
- 추이즈위안, "프티부르주아 사회주의 선언" (2014), 돌베개
- 친후이, "전원시와 광시곡: 농민학에서 본 중국의 역사와 현실사회 비판" (2000), 이산
- 黄宗智, "中國革命中的農村階級鬪爭: 從土改到文革時期的表達性現實与客觀性現實", ~
- 毛澤東, "모택동선집1" (2001), 범우사
- 周其仁, "中國農村改革: 國家和所有權關係的變化: 一個經濟制度變遷史的回顧", 中國社會科學季刊, (6) (1995)
