문학치료의 가능성과 불가능성 ― 딩링(丁玲)의 「사페이 여사의 일기」를 중심으로
(Im)Possibility of Literary Therapy: A Case of Ding Ling’s “Miss Sophie’s Diary”
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay derives from a question whether literary therapy is possible. In “Miss Sophie’s Diary,” the subject, that is “I,” keeps a diary and suffers from mental breakdown. As if it is an everyday practice of praying in the morning, she carefully reads newspaper every morning. Newspaper is a vehicle to keep her being out of isolation by imagining the world as well as love. Her mental breakdown results from the imagined world and love. Journal writing is a method for healing her mental breakdown. Sophie delivers the language of monologue in the confessional genre diary. Whereas confession conceals the will for power, monologue is a voice entirely for oneself; thus, monologue is accompanied by the destruction of language and grammar. Meanwhile, the monologue for her therapy ends with an implied death. The conclusion of “Miss Sophie’s Diary” may show the failure of self-healing with writing; nevertheless, this implied death may also suggest that she frees herself by taking over the mission for becoming herself. The analysis of Ding Ling’s short story reveals the “(im)possibility” of literary therapy. This (im)possibility signifies that its impossibility should be taken into account while exploring the possibility of literary therapy.
Abstract
This essay derives from a question whether literary therapy is possible. In “Miss Sophie’s Diary,” the subject, that is “I,” keeps a diary and suffers from mental breakdown. As if it is an everyday practice of praying in the morning, she carefully reads newspaper every morning. Newspaper is a vehicle to keep her being out of isolation by imagining the world as well as love. Her mental breakdown results from the imagined world and love. Journal writing is a method for healing her mental breakdown. Sophie delivers the language of monologue in the confessional genre diary. Whereas confession conceals the will for power, monologue is a voice entirely for oneself; thus, monologue is accompanied by the destruction of language and grammar. Meanwhile, the monologue for her therapy ends with an implied death. The conclusion of “Miss Sophie’s Diary” may show the failure of self-healing with writing; nevertheless, this implied death may also suggest that she frees herself by taking over the mission for becoming herself. The analysis of Ding Ling’s short story reveals the “(im)possibility” of literary therapy. This (im)possibility signifies that its impossibility should be taken into account while exploring the possibility of literary therapy.
참고문헌 (29)
- "魯迅全集 제1, 2, 3, 4권" (2005), 人民文學出版社
- 筆玲薔, "｢莎菲女士的日記｣中的文學言語變異現象", 湖南文理學院學報(社會科學版), 28(6) (2003)
- 陳嬋, "論｢莎菲女士的日記｣的徐事聲音", 湖南人文科學學院學報, (5) (2006)
- 江上幸子, "現代中國的“新婦女”話語與作爲“摩登女娘”代言人的丁玲", 中國現代文學硏究叢刊, (2) (2006)
- 李定周, "丁玲選集 제2권" (1984), 四川人民出版社
- 王彬, "『新青年』编辑部对｢娜拉｣经典化的赞助路徑探析", 编辑之友, (5) (2013)
- 王宏民, "｢莎菲女士的日記｣的生命美學", 重慶職業技術學院學報, 15(6) (2006)
- 王玉寶, "論｢莎菲女士的日記｣的唯美-頹廢傾向", 文學界⋅人文, (4) (2009)
- 武淑蓮, "文學治療作用的理論檢討", 寧夏社會科學, (1) (2007)
- 游惠玲, "論｢莎菲女士的日記｣的“病態敍事”", 安徽文學, (12) (2011)
- 張紅靜, "論｢莎菲女士的日記｣的文體特徵", 語文學刊, (5) (2010)
- 張薇, "論莎菲與多餘人 — ｢莎菲女士的日記｣主人公形象分析", 安徽文學, (8) (2013)
- 周穎, "｢莎菲女士的日記｣硏究綜述", 廣東開放大學學報, (2) (2016)
- 가라타니 고진, "일본근대문학의 기원" (1997), 민음사
- 김성기, "모더니티란 무엇인가" (1994), 민음사
- 라영균, "독백의 서술구조", 독어교육, 37(37), pp.287~309 (2006), 한국독어독문학교육학회
- 딩링, "중국현대여성소설명작선" (2005), 어문학사
- 딩링, "소피의 일기" (2009), 지식을만드는지식
- 로버트 숄즈, "서사의 본질" (2001), 예림기획
- 루쉰전집번역위원회, "루쉰전집" (2014), 그린비
- M. 바흐친, "도스또예프스키 시학" (1988), 정음사
- 박서현, "하이데거에 있어서 ‘죽음’의 의의", 철학, (109), pp.177~202 (2011), 한국철학회
- 안유경, "질병서사의 관점에서 본 딩링(丁玲)의 ≪소피의 일기 莎菲女士的日記≫", 중국어문논총, (74), pp.207~225 (2016), 중국어문연구회
- 앤더슨, "민족주의의 기원과 전파" (1996), 사회비평사
- 이보경, "魯迅의 글쓰기와 치유 ― ‘환등기 사건’을 중심으로", 중국현대문학, (51), pp.1~24 (2009), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 이보경, "중국에서의 문학치료 연구", 중어중문학, (54), pp.355~378 (2013), 한국중어중문학회
- 임우경, "근대 중국의 민족서사와 젠더" (2014), 창비
- 장징, "근대 중국과 연애의 발견" (2007), 소나무
- 한승옥, "바흐친 소설연구(Ⅱ)", 숭실어문, 16 (2000)