본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘당신’의 변화 양상 고찰 - 국어 호칭ㆍ지칭 체계 수립을 위한 한 시도-

A Study on the Changing Phase of ‘Dangsin' - An Attempt on the Calling & Designating System in Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

A Study on Change Of Value on the Functional Variety of ‘Dangsin' This study aims at finding out the types of functional and valuable changes on the word ‘Dangsin' which has been used until now since it appeared in the 16th century for the first time. The result of this study was arranged in short as follows. Dangsin has been affirmed to go through the change of indicating object from the 18th century. From the 16th century when it began to be in use until 17th century, Dangsin had been used only as a pronoun of the third person. In 18th century, it came to retain some function of the second person and the funtion assumed to be regularized in the 20th century. Under these procedures, the indicating objects also had been certified to undergo some considerable changes. First of all, Tanshin was widely used to mean somebody to whom people can speak with the plain style of speech in the 16th century and was also used for a while to call a person to whom people say in the most honorary term in the 17th century. In the 18th century though, Dangsin sometimes meant someone to be treated with more propriety than the familiar style of speech. Since then, indicating some people and below to whom the familiar style of speech is used, it showed a phase to designate a person to whom rough talking can be used in the 20th century. This study carried on a discussion over the various reason of those changes from the following point of view. That is, under the procesure of functional change from the third person to the second, the unique function of Dangsin as an honorific has been absorbed in intimacy and distance in the end. While the function of intimacy had been brought into relief too much, the meaning of Dangsin finally reached to a situation of intentional design and disregard. Additionally, a recognition that Dangsin is an designating word used in common negatively between couples gave lots of influence on taking its function from the value. Among major generation of age 50~60, a dorminant idea was that wives could not treat their husbands contemptuously while it was possible for husbands to be inhospitable to their wives. In this context therefore, men tend to understand that they are treated contemptously when called ‘Dangsin' by women. They are likely to apply this situation extensively to another general relationship using Dangsin to their wives with a sense of inhospitality. The reason that Dangsin is sometimes used among men with rough talk to raise an unpleasant feeling to another men comes from the same context.

Abstract

A Study on Change Of Value on the Functional Variety of ‘Dangsin' This study aims at finding out the types of functional and valuable changes on the word ‘Dangsin' which has been used until now since it appeared in the 16th century for the first time. The result of this study was arranged in short as follows. Dangsin has been affirmed to go through the change of indicating object from the 18th century. From the 16th century when it began to be in use until 17th century, Dangsin had been used only as a pronoun of the third person. In 18th century, it came to retain some function of the second person and the funtion assumed to be regularized in the 20th century. Under these procedures, the indicating objects also had been certified to undergo some considerable changes. First of all, Tanshin was widely used to mean somebody to whom people can speak with the plain style of speech in the 16th century and was also used for a while to call a person to whom people say in the most honorary term in the 17th century. In the 18th century though, Dangsin sometimes meant someone to be treated with more propriety than the familiar style of speech. Since then, indicating some people and below to whom the familiar style of speech is used, it showed a phase to designate a person to whom rough talking can be used in the 20th century. This study carried on a discussion over the various reason of those changes from the following point of view. That is, under the procesure of functional change from the third person to the second, the unique function of Dangsin as an honorific has been absorbed in intimacy and distance in the end. While the function of intimacy had been brought into relief too much, the meaning of Dangsin finally reached to a situation of intentional design and disregard. Additionally, a recognition that Dangsin is an designating word used in common negatively between couples gave lots of influence on taking its function from the value. Among major generation of age 50~60, a dorminant idea was that wives could not treat their husbands contemptuously while it was possible for husbands to be inhospitable to their wives. In this context therefore, men tend to understand that they are treated contemptously when called ‘Dangsin' by women. They are likely to apply this situation extensively to another general relationship using Dangsin to their wives with a sense of inhospitality. The reason that Dangsin is sometimes used among men with rough talk to raise an unpleasant feeling to another men comes from the same context.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 번역 소학, , 태학사
  2. "병자일기 163X 필사본(박경신 역주본에 의거)", ~
  3. "동국신속삼강행실도(홍문각 영인본 )", ~
  4. "계축일기(형설출판사 영인본)", ~
  5. "인어대방(태학사 영인본)", ~
  6. "성교절요(한국교회사연구소 영인본)", ~ (1882)
  7. 이광수, "흙" (1923), 삼성출판사
  8. 나도향, "환희" (1920), 삼성출판사
  9. 심훈, "상록수" (1935), 삼성출판사
  10. 주요섭, "사랑방 손님과 어머니" (1935), 삼성출판사
  11. 심훈, "영원의 미소" (1933), 삼성출판사
  12. 이광수, "무정" (1917), 삼성출판사
  13. 김미형, "국어 대명사의 발달과 체계에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1990
  14. 김송룡, "16세기 국어의 인칭법에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1985
  15. 김종운, "높임말 ‘당신’ 고 In: 국어 경어법 연구" (1984), 집문당
  16. 김혜숙, "교사 부부의 관계 변화에 따른 호칭어 사용 변화 In: 한국어와 호칭어", pp.245~271 (2006), 역락
  17. 김희숙, "호칭어의 역설 In: 한국어와 호칭어", pp.149~184 (2006), 역락
  18. 박정운, "한국어의 호칭 체계 In: 한국어와 호칭어", pp.75~93 (2006), 역락
  19. 박정운, "2인칭 여성 대명사 ‘자기’의 발달과 사용 In: 한국어와 호칭어", pp.213~239 (2006), 역락
  20. 양영희, "인칭대명사의 기능 변화 유형과 원인- 중세의 3인칭에서 현대의 2인칭화로 -", 우리말글, 38, pp.59~83 (2006), 우리말글학회
  21. 유창돈, "어휘사 연구" (1978), 이우출판사
  22. 이기문, "국어 어휘사 연구" (1991), 동아출판사
  23. 이익섭, "사회언어학" (2004), 민음사
  24. 황문환, "이인칭대명사 ‘자네’의 기원", 국어학, 37, pp.197~218 (2001), 국어학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)