상속권 상실 선고에 관한 법무부 민법 개정안
Amendments to the Korean Civil Code on Disinheritance established by the Ministry of Justice
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Is it fair for parents who did not raise their children to inherit property after their children’s death? In response to this question, the Ministry of Justice of Korea submitted a civil law amendment bill to the National Assembly that introduces a system of disinheritance. This article introduces and reviews such civil law amendments. The main conclusions are as follows: First, in terms of legal stability, it is not appropriate to include violation of duty to support as a reason for disqualification from inheritance. It is also not appropriate for inheritance disqualification to be treated as a preliminary issue in civil litigation. However, termination of parental rights can be recognized as a reason for disqualification from inheritance. Second, when depriving an heir of his inheritance rights, it is desirable to have it go through a court trial. If it is allowed to unilaterally deprive the heir of the inheritance right by the will of the heir, there is a risk that the decedent will arbitrarily deprive the heir of the inheritance right. Third, If the deceased did not express his/her intention to deprive the heir of his/her inheritance rights during his/her lifetime, such heir should not be deprived of the right to inheritance even if the reasons for loss of the right to inheritance are met. If the level of disqualification from inheritance has not been reached, the will of the deceased is necessary to justify the result of Disinheritance.
Abstract
Is it fair for parents who did not raise their children to inherit property after their children’s death? In response to this question, the Ministry of Justice of Korea submitted a civil law amendment bill to the National Assembly that introduces a system of disinheritance. This article introduces and reviews such civil law amendments. The main conclusions are as follows: First, in terms of legal stability, it is not appropriate to include violation of duty to support as a reason for disqualification from inheritance. It is also not appropriate for inheritance disqualification to be treated as a preliminary issue in civil litigation. However, termination of parental rights can be recognized as a reason for disqualification from inheritance. Second, when depriving an heir of his inheritance rights, it is desirable to have it go through a court trial. If it is allowed to unilaterally deprive the heir of the inheritance right by the will of the heir, there is a risk that the decedent will arbitrarily deprive the heir of the inheritance right. Third, If the deceased did not express his/her intention to deprive the heir of his/her inheritance rights during his/her lifetime, such heir should not be deprived of the right to inheritance even if the reasons for loss of the right to inheritance are met. If the level of disqualification from inheritance has not been reached, the will of the deceased is necessary to justify the result of Disinheritance.
참고문헌 (24)
- 곽윤직, "상속법" (2004), 박영사
- 윤진수, "주해상속법, 제1권" (2019), 박영사
- "제3기 가족법개정특별분과위원회 회의록", 법무부, ~ (2011)
- 潮見佳男, "新注釈民法(19), 相続(1)" (2021), 有斐閣
- 中川善之助, "相續法" (2000), 有斐閣
- 권재문, "피상속인에 대한 부양의무 불이행과 상속권 상실", 비교사법, 30(1), pp.111~131 (2023), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 김민지, "다양한 가족 유형의 확산에 따른 「민법」의 개선 과제 검토", 가족법연구, 34(1), pp.31~82 (2020), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
- 김상용, "자녀의 유류분권과 배우자상속분에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 민사법학, (36), pp.669~708 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 김상용, "상속권상실선고의 문제점에 대한 재론 - 법무부 개정안에 대한 비판과 반론 -", 중앙법학, 24(1), pp.7~50 (2022), 중앙법학회
- 김상용, "상속권상실선고에 관한 법무부 개정안의 문제점", 중앙법학, 23(1), pp.7~46 (2021), 중앙법학회
- 김세준, "유류분제한의 필요성과 그 요건—독일상속법 규정의 검토 및 그 시사점을 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 28(3), pp.343~382 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 박지원, "부양의무 해태와 상속결격사유 확대에 관한 입법론", 홍익법학, 21(3), pp.219~250 (2020), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 신옥주, "양육의무 불이행 부모의 상속권 제한을 위한 연구", 법학연구, 67, pp.129~158 (2021), 부설법학연구소[DOI]
- 옥도진, "상속법 개정론에 대한 비판적 검토 ―친족·상속관계의 법정, 사적 상속과 자치 그리고 부양의 원리―", 가족법연구, 36(1), pp.429~516 (2022), 한국가족법학회
- 윤진수, "상속권 상실에 관한 정부의 민법개정안", 비교사법, 28(3), pp.241~278 (2021), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 이동진, "상속결격·상속권상실과 대습상속 ―민법 개정안 비판―", 가족법연구, 35(2), pp.93~118 (2021), 한국가족법학회
- 이우리, "부양의무를 불이행한 부모의 상속결격에 관하여 — 헌법재판소 2017.2.22. 선고 2017헌바59 결정 —", 가족법연구, 32(2), pp.425~438 (2018), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
- 이진기, "상속권상실제도 유감", 법률신문, ~ (2021)
- 이진기, "상속의 이념과 방향 민법 상속편 개정, 어떻게 할 것인가? ", 비교사법, 26(1), pp.289~334 (2019), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 이혜진, "상속인의 범위와 자격 등에 관한 諸문제", 동아법학, (90), pp.37~69 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 정구태, "민법 일부 개정법률안에 대한 管見", 민사법연구, 28 (2020), 대한민사법학회
- 정현수, "부양의무의 해태와 상속권 제한", 법학연구, 32(2), pp.159~190 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 최현숙, "상속과의 연계를통한아동에 대한 부양의무의 강화", 민사법의 이론과 실무, 17(1), pp.183~219 (2013), 민사법의 이론과 실무학회
- 현소혜, "상속권 상실 선고 제도에 대한 입법론적 검토", 가족법연구, 35(3), pp.1~46 (2021), 한국가족법학회