상속의 승인과 포기
Acceptance and Renunciation of Succession
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
When successor succeed deceased, effect of absolute acceptance occurs, if there is not exist any specific manifestation of intention for succession. Nevertheless when successor do not want to succeed or when property right of successor's is damaged, because debt from succession exceeds intestate property, successor can keep his own property through qualified acceptance or renunciation of succession. But I look around regulations of acceptance and renunciation of succession, I find some problem. First, intestate property is not concretely defined, which is used for payment of debt from succession, second, conception of disposition is not clearly defined which is watered as legal absolute acceptance. And I think it is not clearly defined too, that acceptance or renunciation of succession is done, which make any effect to creditor of the estate and creditor of successor. Moreover it is not clear that there is primary beneficiary or a successor who get a part of contribution among successor, he is charged with any liability for the debt from succession in the case of assessment of intestate property or renunciation of succession. Besides some scheme for the problem that may happen because some clause which must be amended with the clause of specific qualified acceptance is not amended, must be researched. Considering this matter, the bill of family law amendment must be carried in the near future, and it is in need of researches in inheritance law of viewpoint of property law.
참고문헌 (12)
- "註釋 民法 相續(1)" (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- "註釋 民法 相續(2)" (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- "註釋 相續法(上)" (1996), 한국사법행정학회
- "親族相續法講義" (2000), 제일법규
- "상속채무가 적극재산을 초과하는 경우 고려기간 내에 한정승인 또는 포기를 하지 않은 상속인의 책임", I (2002), 法文社
- "개정한정승인제도에 관한 소고", (6) (2003)
- "민법 제921조의 이해상반행위에 관한 몇 가지 문제" (1991)
- "相續의 限定承認" (1998)
- "改正民法과 相續의 限定承認,抛棄", 51(4) (2002)
- "상속의 단순승인 의제규정에 대한 헌법불합치 결정의 소급효가 미치는 범위", 16(2) (2002), 韓國家族法學會
- "相續의 單純承認 擬制規定에 대한 憲法不合致決定의 問題點 : 특히 憲法不合致決定의 主文과 관련하여" (2000)
- "民法 제1019조 제3항(特別限定承認)의 解釋 및 그 適用範圍에 관한 實務上 爭點" (2003)
