Remarks on Richards (2010): Are They Distinct Enough?
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are a number of phenomena in languages that prohibit multiple elements of the 'same type' that are 'too close together'. To explain these phenomena, Richards (2010) proposes the general principle of Distinctness. Although this principle nicely captures the facts in English multiple sluicing, the multiple remnants in Japanese sluicing remain to be explained. Thus, Richards (2010) suggests to parameterize the functional features available before linearization to capture the variation between English and Japanese. However, despite his principle and parameter, the multiple Case constructions in Korean/Japanese still pose problems to Richards (2010). I have shown in this paper that Richards need to parameterize the functional category set for nominals to capture the whole data in Korean/ Japanese. Specifically, I have suggested that the variation between English and these languages can be captured under the hypothesis that nominals in these languages are NPs rather than DPs and that the variation between Korean and Japanese can be captured by assuming that Accusative nominals in Korean can choose not to project K(ase)P over NP, while they always project KP in Japanese, resulting in the Double-o constraint effect.
Abstract
There are a number of phenomena in languages that prohibit multiple elements of the 'same type' that are 'too close together'. To explain these phenomena, Richards (2010) proposes the general principle of Distinctness. Although this principle nicely captures the facts in English multiple sluicing, the multiple remnants in Japanese sluicing remain to be explained. Thus, Richards (2010) suggests to parameterize the functional features available before linearization to capture the variation between English and Japanese. However, despite his principle and parameter, the multiple Case constructions in Korean/Japanese still pose problems to Richards (2010). I have shown in this paper that Richards need to parameterize the functional category set for nominals to capture the whole data in Korean/ Japanese. Specifically, I have suggested that the variation between English and these languages can be captured under the hypothesis that nominals in these languages are NPs rather than DPs and that the variation between Korean and Japanese can be captured by assuming that Accusative nominals in Korean can choose not to project K(ase)P over NP, while they always project KP in Japanese, resulting in the Double-o constraint effect.
참고문헌 (56)
- Akiyama,Masahiro, "Multiple Nominative Constructions in Japanese and economy", Linguistic Inquiry, 35(4), pp.671~683 (2004)
- Bittner, Maria, "The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement", Linguistic Inquiry, 27(1), pp.1~68 (1996)
- Chierchia, Gennaro, "Reference to Kinds across Lanugaes", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.339~405 (1998)
- Chierchia, Gennaro, "Plurality of Mass Nouns and the notion of “Semantic Parameter”", Events and Grammar, pp.53~103 (1998), Kluwer
- Cho, Sungeun, "Three Forms of Case Agreement in Korean", 박사, pp.2000
- 조성은, "영어 자동격의 허가와 제약", 현대문법연구, 36(36), pp.45~74 (2004), 현대문법학회
- Cho,Dong-In, "Inalienable-Type Multiple Accusative Constructions in Korean and Japanese", Japanese Korean Linguistics, 2 (1993)
- Choi,Kiyong, "Generative Syntax (of Korean Case and Particle) (Hankwukeo Kyek-kwa Cosa-euy Sayngseong Tongsaron)" (2009), Hankwuk Mwunwhasa
- Choo,Miho, "Topic, relative, inalienable possession and floated quantifier constructions in Korean", Korean Linguistics, 8 (1994)
- morphology interface. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, "Distributed Morphology and the syntax", pp.2006, Embick, David
- Fukui,Naoki, "A Theory of Category Projection and its Applications", 박사, pp.1986
- Fukui, Naoki, "Specifiers and Projection", MITWOPL, 8, pp.138~172 (1986), MIT Press
- Fukui, Naoki, "Nominal Structure: an Extension of the Symmetry Principle In The Derivation of VO and OV", pp.219~254 (2000), John Benjamins
- Halle, Morris, "Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection", The View from building, 20, pp.111~176 (1993), MIT Press
- Han,Jeonghan, "Morphosyntactic Coding of Information Structure in Korean (Multiple Case Marking, Light Verb Construction, Quantifier float: A Role and Reference Grammar Account)" (1999), Hashin Publishing Company
- Harada,S.I, "Counter Equi NP deletion", Annual Bulletin, 7, pp.113~147 (1973), University of Tokyo, Research Institute of Logopedics and Phonicatrics
- Hiraiwa,Ken, "Spelling out the Double-o Constraint", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, pp.723~770 (2010)
- Hong,Ki-Sun, "Argument Selection and Case Marking in Korean", 박사, pp.1991
- 홍용철, "한국어의 후치 요소와 명사 확장 범주", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.743~768 (2008), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "한국어 명사 외곽 수식어들의 어순과 명사구 구조", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.27~50 (2010), 한국생성문법학회
- Im,Hong-Bin, "On the Syntactic Structure of Noun Phrase and Particle Phrase in Korean (Kwukeo Myengsa-kwu-wa Cosa-kwu-euy Tongsakwuco-ey tayhayeo)", Kwanak Eomwun Yeonkwu, 24, pp.1~62 (1999)
- Jang,Youngjun, "Small Clauses and Default Case. Language, Information, and Computation", Proceedings of the 16th Pacific Asia Conference (2002)
- Jung,Yeun-Jin, "Multiple Case marking and its PF interpretation", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 26, pp.239~268 (2001)
- Kang,Seungman, "The Syntax and Morphology of Default Case" (1998), University of Florida
- Kang,Myung-Yoon, "“Possessor Raising” in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.80~88 (1987)
- Kang,Myung-Yoon, "Topics in Korean Syntax", 박사, pp.1988
- Kang,Myung-Yoon, "Hankwukeo Tongsaron-euy cey Mwuncey" (1992), Hanshin Mwunwhasa
- Kang,Young-Se, "Case Marking in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, pp.88~100 (1985)
- Kang,Young-Se, "Korean Syntax and Universal Grammar", 박사, pp.1986
- Kim,Euyswu, "Case and Theta-roles in Korean (Hankwukeo-euy Kyek-kwa Euymi-yeok)" (2006), Tayhaksa
- 김종복, "On the NP Structure and Prenominal Ordering in Korean", 생성문법연구, 20(4), pp.597~602 (2010), 한국생성문법학회
- Kim,Sun-Woong, "Verb raising and multiple subject constructions", Studies in Generative Grammar, 11, pp.69~95 (2001)
- Kim,Young-Joo, "Default Nominative Case in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 2, pp.113~148 (1991)
- Kim, Jong-Bok, "Case assignment in the clause and adjucts", The proceedings of the 11th Harvard international symposium on Korean linguistics, pp.506~519 (2006), Harvard University
- 고희정, "Multiple Case Sharing and Syntactic Structure", 생성문법연구, 19(4), pp.423~451 (2009), 한국생성문법학회
- Kuroda,S.-Y, "Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese", Linguisticae Investigationes, 12, pp.1~47 (1988)
- 이혜란, "Criterial Effects and Multiple Nominative Constructions", 생성문법연구, 18(3), pp.477~508 (2008), 한국생성문법학회
- Maling, Joan, "Case assignment in the inalienable possession construction in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.37~68 (1992)
- Marantz,Alec, "No escape from syntax: don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon", Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium: Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), pp.201~225 (1997)
- Merchant,Jason, "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Moon,Gui-Sun, "The predication operation and multiple subject constructions in Korean: focusing on inalienable possessive constructions", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10, pp.239~263 (2000)
- Nakamura, H, "Multiple Subject Constructions in Japanese: A Dynamic Syntax Account", LNAI, 5447, pp.103~118 (2009)
- 박범식, "Deriving Multiple Sluicing in Korean", 생성문법연구, 17(4), pp.515~533 (2007), 한국생성문법학회
- Poser,William J, "The “Double-o Constraint”: evidence for a direct object relation in Japanese", 석사, pp.1981
- Poser,William J, "The Double-o Constraint in Japanese", 석사, pp.2002
- Richards,Norvin, "Uttering Trees. Cambridge" (2010), MIT Press
- Saito,Mamoru, "Case marking in Japanese: A preliminary study", 석사, pp.1982
- Sauerland,Uli, "Sluicing and islands", 석사, pp.1995
- Schütze,Carlson T.R, "On the nature of default Case", Syntax, 4(3), pp.205~238 (2001)
- Shibatani,Masayoshi, "Nihongo no bunseki" (1978), Taishukan
- Yang.Dong-Whee, "Atypical Aspects of Korean Case: A Minimalist Perspective", The 12th International Conference on Korean Linguistics (2000), the Czech Republic
- Yoo,Yunchul, "“Extra” Accusatives in Korean and their implications for Japanese", 박사, pp.2008
- Yoon,James H, "Some queries concerning the syntax of multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.138~162 (1987)
- Yoon,James H, "Theta theory and the Grammar of Inalienable Possession Constructions", Nels, 20 (1990)
- Yoon,Jeong-Me, "ECM and multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.369~381 (1989)
- Youn,Cheong, "A Relational Analysis of Korean Multiple Nominative Constructions", 박사, pp.1990