본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

브라이언 프리엘의 『루나사 축제의 춤』: 아일랜드 여성 서발턴의 젠더/섹슈얼리티와 미완의 혁명

Brian Friel’s Dancing at Lughnasa: Irish Female Subaltern’s Gender/Sexuality and the Unfinished Revolution

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Brian Friel’s Dancing at Lughnasa, set in the Irish Republic of the 1930s, focuses on Mundy sisters’ performativity of gender roles, their subversive resistance, and their tragic failure. In this play, Friel exposes the social, political, religious mechanisms in Ballybeg which have constructed Irish female subalterns’ gender role and constrained their life. In the patriarchal world of Friel’s plays, the most subjected are the Irish female subalterns in terms of gender, sexuality, class, and situation. And, therefore, Irish women in Friel’s plays lack their own voice. This study explores Mundy sisters’ socially constructed gender roles and their sexuality in terms of Gayatri Spivak’s concept of ‘subaltern,’ Michel Foucault’s theory on the relationship between power and body/ subject-product, and Judith Butler’s theory on gender and ‘performativity.’ In Dancing at Lughnasa, the narrator’s or Michael’s unavoidable male gaze perpetuates the typical male gaze that has oppressed women and engendered their gender roles and space. This paper also examines the subversive resistance of Mundy sisters’ unruly body and the eruption of sexuality against the stifling patriarchal expectations. These Irish subalterns struggle to destabilize the mechanism through which social/state authority is performed on and through their bodies. The sisters, who become full-bodied, explode their suppressed sexuality in their defiant and desperate dance, defying the corporeal codes of respectable female behavior and the narrow confines of their kitchen lives. Mundy sisters’ defiance is, however, at best a momentary rebellion. Their challenge to the constitutional and cultural restrictions cannot get over the mechanisms of their society. The mechanism of power which tames these women is everywhere, in the rigid Irish Catholic notion of moral rectitude, in the economic policies of the new State, in family structures, and in the legislative paternalism. As a result, they live out their lives in wretched circumstances. Their tragic failure gives a punishing message to women about the consequences of deviation. In Dancing at Lughnasa, Friel critiques the postcolonial Ireland as a society stifled by the reified patriarchal authority and the male-centered economic, class, and gender systems. In this sense, Dancing at Lughnasa can echo a meaningful message even to the twenty-first century Irish women exploring the unkept promises of the Irish revolution.

Abstract

Brian Friel’s Dancing at Lughnasa, set in the Irish Republic of the 1930s, focuses on Mundy sisters’ performativity of gender roles, their subversive resistance, and their tragic failure. In this play, Friel exposes the social, political, religious mechanisms in Ballybeg which have constructed Irish female subalterns’ gender role and constrained their life. In the patriarchal world of Friel’s plays, the most subjected are the Irish female subalterns in terms of gender, sexuality, class, and situation. And, therefore, Irish women in Friel’s plays lack their own voice. This study explores Mundy sisters’ socially constructed gender roles and their sexuality in terms of Gayatri Spivak’s concept of ‘subaltern,’ Michel Foucault’s theory on the relationship between power and body/ subject-product, and Judith Butler’s theory on gender and ‘performativity.’ In Dancing at Lughnasa, the narrator’s or Michael’s unavoidable male gaze perpetuates the typical male gaze that has oppressed women and engendered their gender roles and space. This paper also examines the subversive resistance of Mundy sisters’ unruly body and the eruption of sexuality against the stifling patriarchal expectations. These Irish subalterns struggle to destabilize the mechanism through which social/state authority is performed on and through their bodies. The sisters, who become full-bodied, explode their suppressed sexuality in their defiant and desperate dance, defying the corporeal codes of respectable female behavior and the narrow confines of their kitchen lives. Mundy sisters’ defiance is, however, at best a momentary rebellion. Their challenge to the constitutional and cultural restrictions cannot get over the mechanisms of their society. The mechanism of power which tames these women is everywhere, in the rigid Irish Catholic notion of moral rectitude, in the economic policies of the new State, in family structures, and in the legislative paternalism. As a result, they live out their lives in wretched circumstances. Their tragic failure gives a punishing message to women about the consequences of deviation. In Dancing at Lughnasa, Friel critiques the postcolonial Ireland as a society stifled by the reified patriarchal authority and the male-centered economic, class, and gender systems. In this sense, Dancing at Lughnasa can echo a meaningful message even to the twenty-first century Irish women exploring the unkept promises of the Irish revolution.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 미셸 푸코, "감시와 처벌: 감옥의 역사" (2003), 나남
  2. 미셸 푸코, "성의 역사 1: 앎의 의지" (2004), 나남
  3. 스티븐 모튼, "스피박 넘기" (2004), 앨피
  4. 양운덕, "미셸 푸코" (2004), 살림
  5. 태혜숙, "탈식민주의 페미니즘" (2001), 여이연
  6. 페트리샤 레비, "지구촌 문화충격 탈출기: 아일랜드" (2005), 휘슬러
  7. Bem, Sandra Lipsitz, "In a Male-Centered World, Female Differences Are Transformed Into Female Disadvantages", The Chronicle of Higher Education, (40-50), pp.B1~B3 (1994)
  8. Brown, Terence, "Ireland: A Social and Cultural History 1922-2002" (2004), Harper Perennial
  9. Brown, Terence, "Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex" (1993), Routledge
  10. Butler, Judith, "Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. in: Performing Feminisms: Feminist Critical Theory and Theatre", pp.270~282 (1990), Johns Hopkins UP
  11. Dolan, Jill, "The Feminist Spectator as Critic" (1988), U of Michigan P,
  12. Friel, Brian, "Dancing at Lughnasa. Brian Friel: Plays 2" (1990), Faber
  13. Harris, Claudia, "The Engendered Space: Performing Friel’s Women from Cass McGuire to Molly Sweeney. in:Brian Friel: A Casebook.", pp.43~75 (1997), Garlands
  14. Jankowski, Theodora A, "Women in Power in the Early Modern Drama" (1992), U of Illinois P
  15. Jones,Nesta, "Brian Friel: Faber Critical Guides" (2000), Faber
  16. Lojek, Helen, "Dancing at Lughnasa and the Unfinished Revolution. in:The Cambridge Companion to Brian Friel", pp.78~90 (2006), Cambridge UP
  17. McGrath,F.C, "Brian Friel’s (Post)Colonial Drama: Language, Illusion, and Politics" (1999), Syracuse UP
  18. McMullan, Anna, "Performativity, unruly bodies and gender in Brian Friel’s drama. in:The Cambridge Companion to Brian Friel", pp.143~153 (2006), Cambridge UP
  19. Roche, Anthony, "Contemporary Irish Drama: From Beckett to McGuinness" (1994), St. Martin’s
  20. Roche, Anthony, "The Cambridge Companion to Brian Friel" (2006), Cambridge UP
  21. Sigillito, Gina, "Daughters of Mauve" (2007), Citadel
  22. Spivak,Gayatri Chakravorty."Can the Subaltern Speak?"Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory.Eds.P.Williams and L.Chrisman.New York:Columbia UP, "Can the Subaltern Speak?. in:Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory", pp.66~111 (1992), Columbia UP
  23. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, "French Feminism in an International Frame. in:Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics", pp.134~153 (1987), Methuen

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)