본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

범주 응집성과 기저율의 상호작용이 선호의 이유 추정에 미치는 효과

Effect of Interaction between Category Coherence and Base Rate on Presumption of Reasons for Preference

이국희|도은영
한국인지과학회 (The Korean Society for Cognitive Science)|2020.09|인지과학 (Korean Journal of Cognitive Science)|제31권 제3호|pp. 77-102|DOI 10.19066/cogsci.2020.31.3.002

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

기저율범주 응집성고정관념 형성StereotypingBase Rate심리학적 본질주의선호의 이유 추정Category CoherencePsychological EssentialismPresumption of Reasons for Preference
주제분류인지과학

초록

복장이나 언행에서 유사성이 높고, 다른 범주와 구분이 용이한 군인이나 수녀들이 가진 속성은 일반화되기 쉽다는 범주 응집성 효과 연구에는 어느 정도 진전이 있었다. 그러나 이러한 범주 응집성 효과의 근본에 어떤 심리적 기제가 있는지에 대한 직접적인 연구가 드물었기에 본 연구에서 다루어보고자 한다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 응집성이 높은 범주(수녀, 군인, 비행기승무원)와 낮은 범주(통역사, 웨딩플래너, 플로리스트)를 선정한 후, 두 가지 실험을 진행하였다. 실험 1은 응집성이 높은 범주에서 [속성X]가 반복 관찰될 때가 응집성 낮은 범주에서 [속성X]가 반복 관찰될 때보다 해당 범주 구성원이 [속성X]를 선호할 만한 이유가 있을 것으로 추정하는 정도(선호의 이유 추정 정도)가 높아지는 현상을 관찰하였다. 실험 2는 응집성이 높은 범주의 경우, 일상적으로 드물게 나타나는 [속성X](기저율 30%)이 관찰될 때는 선호의 이유 추정 정도가 높아지지만, 일상에서 자주 나타나는 [속성Y](기저율 70%)가 관찰될 때는 선호의 이유 추정 정도가 낮아지는 현상을 관찰하였고, 응집성이 낮은 범주의 경우, 일상에서 드물게 나타나는 속성과 자주 나타나는 속성 모두 선호의 이유 추정 정도가 낮은 경향을 확인하였다. 즉 범주 응집성과 기저율의 이원 상호작용이 선호의 이유 추정 정도에 미치는 효과가 유의하였다. 본 연구가 심리학적 본질주의, 고정관념 형성에 시사점을 가진다는 것에 대해 논의하였다.

Abstract

Some progress has been made in the study of the category coherence effect, which states that the attributes of soldiers or nuns with similarities in dress and behavior, and easily distinguished from other categories, are likely to be generalized. However, few studies have examined the fundamental psychological mechanisms that underlie this category coherence effect, and this study aims to fill this gap. For this purpose, two experiments were conducted after selecting categories with high coherence (nuns, soldiers, and flight attendants) and those with low coherence (interpreters, wedding planners, and florists). In experiment 1, we observed that the members of a category were presumed to have certain reasons to prefer [property X] (presumption of reasons for preference), with this presumption becoming stronger when [property X] was observed repeatedly in high-coherence categories than in the case of low-coherence categories. Experiment 2 showed that for the high-coherence categories, the presumption of reasons for preference was stronger when [property X], rarely seen in everyday life (base rate of 30%), was observed, while the presumption of reasons for preference was weaker when [property Y] (base rate 70%), frequently seen in everyday life, was observed. In the low-coherence categories, the presumption of reasons for preference tended to be weak for both rare and frequent attributes. That is, there were significant effects of the two-way interaction between category coherence and base rate on the presumption of reasons for preference. This study has implications for psychological essentialism and stereotyping.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 이국희, "범주 응집성과 기저율의 상호작용이 속성 일반화에 미치는 효과", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 32(1), pp.1~19 (2020), 한국인지및생물심리학회[DOI]
  2. Balkcom, E. R, "Aversion to organs donated by suicide victims : The role of psychological essentialism", Cognition, 192, pp.104037~ (2019)
  3. Bastian, B, "Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), pp.228~235 (2006)
  4. Black, J. B, "Causal coherence and memory for events in narratives", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(3), pp.267~275 (1981)
  5. Brainard, D. H, "The psychophysics toolbox", Spatial Vision, 10(4), pp.433~436 (1997)
  6. Butchart, G. C, "The exceptional community: On strangers, foreigners, and communication", Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(1), pp.21~25 (2010)
  7. Caprariello, P. A, "Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions : A causal test of the stereotype content model", Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(2), pp.147~155 (2009)
  8. Cimpian, A, "The inherence heuristic : An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(5), pp.461~480 (2014)
  9. Colombo, M, "There’s foreigner and foreigner : Xenophobic reasoning and anti-‐immigrant discourse", Journal of Community Psychology, 3(4), pp.135~143 (2012)
  10. Dantlgraber, M, "Conceptual fluency in inductive reasoning", PloS one, 14(11), pp.e0225050~ (2019)
  11. Dhamoon, R, "Dangerous(internal)foreigners and nation-building : The case of Canada", International Political Science Review, 30(2), pp.163~183 (2009)
  12. Edeling, A, "When does market share matter? New empirical generalizations from a meta-analysis of the market share-performance relationship", Journal of Marketing, 82(3), pp.1~24 (2018)
  13. Gawronski, B, "It’s in the mind of the beholder : The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), pp.16~30 (2003)
  14. Gelman, S. A, "Psychological essentialism in children", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), pp.404~409 (2004)
  15. Haslam, N, "Psychological essentialism, implicit theories, and intergroup relations", Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), pp.63~76 (2006)
  16. Hayes, B. K, "Inductive reasoning 2.0", Cognitive Science, 9(3), pp.e1459~ (2018)
  17. Heit, E, "Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), pp.340~344 (2005)
  18. Holyoak, K. J, "Analogical and category-based inference : A theoretical integration with Bayesian causal models", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 139(4), pp.702~727 (2010)
  19. Irawan, M. Z, "A market share analysis for hybrid cars in Indonesia", Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(3), pp.336~341 (2018)
  20. Karasawa, M, "Psychological essentialism at the explicit and implicit levels : The unique status of social categories", Japanese Psychological Research, 61(2), pp.107~122 (2019)
  21. Karpinski, A, "The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), pp.16~32 (2006)
  22. Keven, N, "Events, narratives and memory", Synthese, 193(8), pp.2497~2517 (2016)
  23. Kim, S, "Influence of category coherence and type of base-rate acquisition on property generalization", Acta Psychologica, 172, pp.64~70 (2017)
  24. 김영란, "Cultural Diversity and Cultural Co-existence between Asian Immigrants and the Natives in Korea", OMNES: The Journal of Multicultural Society, 7(2), pp.60~98 (2017), 아시아여성연구원[DOI]
  25. Kutzner, F, "Stereotypes as pseudocontingencies", European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), pp.1~49 (2017)
  26. Lee, J. C, "Negative evidence and inductive reasoning in generalization of associative learning", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 148(2), pp.289~303 (2019)
  27. Liu, F, "Inductive reasoning differs between taxonomic and thematic contexts : Electrophysiological evidence", Frontiers in Psychology, 10, pp.1702~ (2019)
  28. Liu, Y, "Neural basis of disgust perception in racial prejudice", Human brain mapping, 36(12), pp.5275~5286 (2015)
  29. Macrae, C. N, "Social cognition : Thinking categorically about others", Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), pp.93~120 (2000)
  30. Medin, D. L, "Similarity and analogical reasoning", pp.179~195 (1989), Cambridge University Press
  31. Newman, G. E, "The essence of essentialism", Mind & Language, 34(5), pp.585~605 (2019)
  32. Osherson, D. N, "Category-based induction", Psychological Review, 97(2), pp.185~200 (1990)
  33. Patalano, A. L, "The importance of being coherent : Category coherence, cross-classification, and reasoning", Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), pp.407~424 (2006)
  34. Patalano, A. L, "The role of category coherence in experience-based prediction", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), pp.629~634 (2007)
  35. Pelli, D. G, "The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics : Transforming numbers into movies", Spatial Vision, 10(4), pp.437~442 (1997)
  36. Prentice, D. A, "Psychological essentialism of human categories", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), pp.202~206 (2007)
  37. Rangel, U, "Essentialism goes social : Belief in social determinism as a component of psychological essentialism", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), pp.1056~1078 (2011)
  38. Rotello, C. M, "Do modals identify better models? A comparison of signal detection and probabilistic models of inductive reasoning", Cognitive psychology, 112, pp.1~24 (2019)
  39. Rydgren, J, "The logic of xenophobia", Rationality and society, 16(2), pp.123~148 (2004)
  40. Sanjana, N. E, "Advances in neural information processing systems", pp.59~66 (2003)
  41. Sutherland, S. L, "Developmental evidence for a link between the inherence bias in explanation and psychological essentialism", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 177, pp.265~281 (2019)
  42. Suzuki, B. H, "Revisiting the model minority stereotype : Implications for student affairs practice and higher education", New directions for student services, 2002(97), pp.21~32 (2002)
  43. Thurman, N, "Newspaper consumption in the mobile age : Re-assessing multi-platform performance and market share using"time-spent"", Journalism Studies, 19(10), pp.1409~1429 (2018)
  44. Wagner, W, "Essentialist theory of ‘hybrids’ : From animal kinds to ethnic categories and race", Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(4), pp.232~246 (2010)
  45. Winiewski, M, "Stereotype content as a collective memory of place and its past intergroup relations", Social Psychological Bulletin, 14(2), pp.1~27 (2019)
  46. Wu, Y, "Race", ethnicity and perceptions of the police : A comparison of White, Black, Asian and Hispanic Americans, 2014, pp.24(2), 135~157

관련 논문AI추천

범주 응집성과 기저율의 상호작용이 속성 일반화에 미치는 효과김신우, 이국희, 이형철한국인지및생물심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물2020 · 제32권 제1호코로나-19로 인한 스트레스 지각과 범주 응집성이 범주기반 귀납적 일반화에 미치는 효과도은영, 이국희한국인지과학회 · 인지과학2022 · 제33권 제3호범주예시에 의해 지각된 범주내 변산성이 범주기반 귀납적 일반화에 미치는 효과김신우, 이국희, 이형철한국인지과학회 · 인지과학2014 · 제25권 제3호인과적 범주의 속성추론 모델링김신우, 이형철한국인지과학회 · 인지과학2017 · 제28권 제4호범주기반 속성추론: 인과관계 강도의 검증김신우, 이형철, 조준형한국감성과학회 · 감성과학2023 · 제26권 제1호인과적 사슬구조에서의 범주기반 속성추론김신우, 이형철, 최인범한국감성과학회 · 감성과학2021 · 제24권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (1건)

온라인 비디오 게임 사용과 사회성 연구의 주요 쟁점에 관한 문헌고찰이경민, 유제광, 신민정pp. 55-76
원문 보기