범주기반 속성추론: 인과관계 강도의 검증
Category-Based Feature Inference: Testing Causal Strength
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 범주속성들이 공통원인 혹은 공통효과 인과 네트워크로 연결되었을 때 인과강도에 따른 속성추론을검증했다. 인과범주에서 속성추론을 검증한 기존 연구들은 인과관계의 방향, 연결된 속성의 개수, 원인 혹은 결과의여부 등에 따라 고유한 추론 패턴이 나타남을 보여주었다. 다만 기존 연구들은 인과관계에 따른 추론패턴을 주로탐색했으며 인과관계의 효과가 인과강도에 따라 어떤 변화를 보이는지 확인한 연구는 찾아보기 어렵다. 본 연구에서는 공통원인(실험 1), 공통효과(실험 2) 네트워크에서 인과강도에 따른 속성추론을 검증했다. 이를 위해 참가자들에게 속성들이 인과적 관련성을 가지는 범주를 학습하게 한 다음 속성추론 과제를 실시하도록 했다. 실험 결과 인과관계 뿐만 아니라 인과강도 역시 속성추론에 중요한 영향을 미쳤다. 인과강도가 강할 떄 공통원인 속성에 대해서는추론이 약해진 반면 공통효과 속성에 대해서는 추론이 강해졌다. 또한 인과강도가 강할 때 공통원인이 존재하는 경우 결과속성들에 대한 추론이 강해진 반면 공통효과에서는 반대의 결과가 나타났다. 특히 공통효과에서는 인과강도가 강할 때 인과적 절감이 더 뚜렷하게 나타났다. 이 결과들은 인과적 범주에서의 속성추론에서 참가자들은 인과관계 뿐만 아니라 인과강도를 고려한다는 것을 일관성있게 보여준다.
Abstract
This research investigated category-based feature inference when category features were connected in common cause and common effect causal networks. Previous studies that tested feature inference in causal categories showed unique inference patterns depending on causal direction, number of related features, whether the to-be-inferred feature was cause or effect, etc. However, these prior studies primarily focused on inference pattens that arise from causal relations, and few studies directly explored how the effects of causal relations vary depending on causal strength. We tested feature inference in common cause (Expt. 1) and common effect (Expt. 2) causal categories when casual strengths were either strong or weak. To this end, we had participants learn causal categories where features were causally linked and then perform feature inference task. The results showed that causal strengths as well as causal relations had important impacts on feature inference. When causal strength was strong, inference for common cause feature became weaker but that for the common effect feature became stronger. Moreover, when causal strength was strong and common cause was present, inference for the effect features became stronger, whereas the results were reversed in common effect networks. In particular, in common effect networks, casual discounting was more evident with strong causal strength. These results consistently demonstrate that participants consider not only causal relations but also causal strength in feature inference of causal categories.
참고문헌 (35)
- Bruner, J. S., "A study of thinking" (1956), John Wiley and Sons
- 최인범, "인과적 사슬구조에서의 범주기반 속성추론", 감성과학, 24(1), pp.59~72 (2021), 한국감성과학회[DOI]
- 도은영, "범주 응집성과 기저율의 상호작용이 선호의 이유 추정에 미치는 효과", 인지과학, 31(3), pp.77~102 (2020), 한국인지과학회[DOI]
- Susan A Gelman, "The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories", Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), pp.65~95 (1988), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Gelman, S. A., "The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Daniel M. Hausman, "Independence, Invariance and the Causal Markov Condition", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50(4), pp.521~583 (1999), University of Chicago Press[DOI]
- Hirschfeld, L. A., "Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child's construction of human kinds" (1996), The MIT Press
- Nancy S. Kim, "Causal diversity effects in information seeking", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), pp.81~88 (2008), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- 김신우, "심리적 본질주의와 범주표상", 인지과학, 32(2), pp.55~73 (2021), 한국인지과학회[DOI]
- 김신우, "인과적 범주의 속성추론 모델링", 인지과학, 28(4), pp.329~347 (2017), 한국인지과학회[DOI]
- Mary E. Lassaline, "Induction and category coherence", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(1), pp.95~99 (1996), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- J. P. Laux, "Causal discounting in the presence of a stronger cue is due to bias", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), pp.213~218 (2010), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- 이국희, "범주 응집성과 기저율의 상호작용이 속성 일반화에 미치는 효과", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 32(1), pp.1~19 (2020), 한국인지및생물심리학회[DOI]
- Douglas L. Medin, "A relevance theory of induction", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), pp.517~532 (2003), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Medin, D. L., "Similarity and analogical reasoning", pp.179~195 (1989), Cambridge University Press
- Michael W. Morris, "When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution.", Psychological Review, 102(2), pp.331~355 (1995), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Murphy, G. L., "The big book of concepts" (2002), MIT Press
- Eleonore Neufeld, "Psychological essentialism and the structure of concepts", Philosophy Compass, 17(5) (2022), Wiley[DOI]
- Daniel N. Osherson, "Category-based induction.", Psychological Review, 97(2), pp.185~200 (1990), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Kevin O'Neill, "Confidence and gradation in causal judgment", Cognition, 223, pp.105036~ (2022), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Pearl, J., "Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Julia Beth Proffitt, "Expertise and category-based induction", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4), pp.811~828 (2000), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Bob Rehder, "A Causal-Model Theory of Conceptual Representation and Categorization", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), pp.1141~1159 (2003), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Bob Rehder, "Causal‐Based Property Generalization", Cognitive Science, 33(3), pp.301~344 (2009), Wiley[DOI]
- Bob Rehder, "Feature inference and the causal structure of categories", Cognitive Psychology, 50(3), pp.264~314 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Bob Rehder, "Category coherence and category-based property induction", Cognition, 91(2), pp.113~153 (2004), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Bob Rehder, "How causal knowledge affects classification: A generative theory of categorization", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), pp.659~683 (2006), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Bob Rehder, "Classification as diagnostic reasoning", Memory & Cognition, 37(6), pp.715~729 (2009), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Reichenbach, H., "The direction of time" (1956), University of California Press
- Lance J. Rips, "Inductive judgments about natural categories", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), pp.665~681 (1975), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Eleanor Rosch, "Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories", Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), pp.573~605 (1975), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Sloman, S. A., "Causal models : How we think about the world and its alternatives" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Barbara A. Spellman, "How two causes are different from one: The use of (un)conditional information in Simpson's paradox", Memory & Cognition, 29(2), pp.193~208 (2001), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Simon Stephan, "The role of mechanism knowledge in singular causation judgments", Cognition, 218, pp.104924~ (2022), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Michael R. Waldmann, "Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), pp.600~608 (2001), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]