위난상황에서 개인의 자유와 구조의무
Each Individual's Freedom and Duty to Rescue under Danger
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Each Individual in a society is human beings of haecceity(independence) and sociality(solidarity) that is sublated both extremes of individualism and totalism. Each Individual is not deified and a society is not absolutized under the political system that is supported by interdependent and mutually beneficial relationship between individual and society. Therefore each individual should be respected by a society and the society must be restricted for each individual's freedom. But also must be each individual related to a society and restricted by the society. The bad samaritan law being fixed by criminal law, one of legal methods for the realization of individuals in society and a society for individuals without being damaged this double-sidedness of human beings of independent and social being, is confirmation that the realization of social integration is an important condition for self-realization. Assuming that the chances of being beneficiary are not much smaller than those of being the one who must give aid, bad samaritan law is clearly in mutual interests between individuals and society.
Abstract
Each Individual in a society is human beings of haecceity(independence) and sociality(solidarity) that is sublated both extremes of individualism and totalism. Each Individual is not deified and a society is not absolutized under the political system that is supported by interdependent and mutually beneficial relationship between individual and society. Therefore each individual should be respected by a society and the society must be restricted for each individual's freedom. But also must be each individual related to a society and restricted by the society. The bad samaritan law being fixed by criminal law, one of legal methods for the realization of individuals in society and a society for individuals without being damaged this double-sidedness of human beings of independent and social being, is confirmation that the realization of social integration is an important condition for self-realization. Assuming that the chances of being beneficiary are not much smaller than those of being the one who must give aid, bad samaritan law is clearly in mutual interests between individuals and society.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김일수, "한국 형법과 '나쁜 사마리라인' 제재문제", 서강대 사회과학연구, 3 (1994)
- 오남석, "선한 사마리아인法 만든다, 문화일보, 2005년 6월 8일자 기사", ~ (2005)
- 이상돈, "치료중단과 형사책임" (2003), 법문사
- 최종고, "법과 윤리(증보신판)" (2000), 경세원
- 조 용, "美법조·종교계, 사마리아인法제정 찬반공방, 문화일보, 1998. 8. 27일자 기사", ~ (1998)
- 한국형사정책연구원, "형사법령 제정자료집 (1) 형법" (1990), 한국형사정책연구원
- Seelmann, Kurt, "법과 도덕", 한양대 법학연구소 주최 강연문 (2006)
- 藤倉晧一郞, "隣人訴訟と近隣訴訟", ジユリト, (828) (1985)
- 竹村和也, "救助義務と悪しきサマリア人の法", 同志社法学, 51(3) (1999)
- 樋口範雄, "よきサマリア人法(日本版)の檢討", ジュリスト, (1158) (1999)
- Booth, Cathy, "The Bad Samaritan, Time", ~ (1998)
- Kahlo, Michael, "Die Handlungsform der Unterlassung als Kriminaldelikt", ~ (2001)
- Kühl, Kristian, "Freiheit und Solidarität bei den Notrechten : Rechtsphilosopische Überlegungen auf der Basis der praktischen Philosophie Kants. in: Festschrift für H. J. Hirsch" (1999)
- Kühl, Kristian, "Strafrecht und Moral-Trennendes und Verbindendes. in: Festschrift für H.-L. Schreiber" (2003)
- Ames, James Barr, "Law and Morals' in Ratcliffe. in: The Good Samaritan and the and the Law" (1966), Doubleday
- Malm, H. M., "Liberalism, Bad Samaritan Laws, and Legal Paternalism", Ethics, 19(1) (1995)
- McClintock, Lon T., "Duty to Aid the Endangered Act : The Impact and Potential of the Vermont Approach", Vermont Law Review, 7(1) (1982)
- McIntyre, Alison, "Guilty Bystanders? On the Legitimacy of Duty to Rescue Statutes", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23(2) (1994)
- Naucke, Wolfgang, "Strafrechtrecht-Eine Einfürung, 10. Aufl" (2002)
- Rasor, Paul B., "A Law Teacher Looks at the Good Samaritan Story", WASHBURN L. J., 31, pp.71~ (1991)