긴급구조의무와 나쁜 사마리아인법
The Duty to Rescue in Emergency Situations and The Bad Samaritan Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The bases of criticism that the bad samaritan law which enforces to perform the duty to rescue in emergency situations by punishment is unacceptable by the reason of moralization of criminal law include the restriction of freedom of attitude by order, the clear-cut distinction of between law and moral, the ambiguity of positive duties etc. It is only decided between positive and passive duties whether the restriction of freedom is within the minimum or not. It is impossible to judge whether the restriction itself within the minimum or not, and impossible to judge by the discrimination between prohibition and order. Positive duty also could not excluded from legal duty even if positive duties is much more in the degree of restriction of freedom than passive duties and they usually belong to moral duty. Because such a restriction is fundamentally necessary for the existence of liberal society and the discrimination between law and moral changes according to time and society. Also against the criticism of the ambiguity of positive duty, for example, being the duty of solidarity restricted to accident cases or dangerous situations, the range of behavior discretion of each individual in the positive duty to rescue becomes narrow. The general duty to rescue of the bad Samaritan law is given to the one only who recognize an accident and is in a position to rescue the victim.
Abstract
The bases of criticism that the bad samaritan law which enforces to perform the duty to rescue in emergency situations by punishment is unacceptable by the reason of moralization of criminal law include the restriction of freedom of attitude by order, the clear-cut distinction of between law and moral, the ambiguity of positive duties etc. It is only decided between positive and passive duties whether the restriction of freedom is within the minimum or not. It is impossible to judge whether the restriction itself within the minimum or not, and impossible to judge by the discrimination between prohibition and order. Positive duty also could not excluded from legal duty even if positive duties is much more in the degree of restriction of freedom than passive duties and they usually belong to moral duty. Because such a restriction is fundamentally necessary for the existence of liberal society and the discrimination between law and moral changes according to time and society. Also against the criticism of the ambiguity of positive duty, for example, being the duty of solidarity restricted to accident cases or dangerous situations, the range of behavior discretion of each individual in the positive duty to rescue becomes narrow. The general duty to rescue of the bad Samaritan law is given to the one only who recognize an accident and is in a position to rescue the victim.
참고문헌 (26)
- Linden, "Rescuers and Good Samaritans", Alta. L. Rev., 89, pp.90~ (1971)
- "Kitty Genovese 사건(New York Times, Mar. 27. 1964)", ~ (1964)
- Rudzinski, "The Duty to Rescue. in: The Good Samaritan and The Law 91" (1966)
- Paul B. Rasor, "A Law Teacher Looks at the Good Samaritan Story", Washburn Law Journal, 31(1) (1991)
- 樋口範雄, "よきサマリア人と法", 法学ゼミナー, (469), pp.108~109 (1994)
- McClintock, "Duty to Aid the Endangered Act : The Impact and Potential of the Vermont Approach", Vermont Law Review, 7(1) (1982)
- 이상돈, "치료중단과 형사책임", pp.85~86 (2003), 법문사
- 김일수, "한국 형법과 나쁜 사마리라인 제재문제", 서강대 사회과학연구, 3, pp.233~ (1994)
- Feinberg, "Freedom and Fulfillment" (1992), Princeton Univ. Press
- 백원기, "구조거부행위에 대한 형사법적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 8(2), pp.123~146 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 竹村和也, "救助義務と悪しきサマリア人の法", 同志社法学, 51(3) (1999)
- Feinberg, "Harm to Others" (1985), Oxford Univ. Press
- McIntyre, "Guilty Bystanders? On the Legitimacy of Duty to Rescue Statutes", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23(3), pp.188~ (1994)
- Puppe, "Der Erfolg und Seine kausale Erklärung im Strafrecht", ZStW, 92, pp.898~ (1980)
- Samson, "Begehung und Unterlassung, FS-Welzel", 586~ (1974)
- Jakobs, "Die strafrechtliche Zurechnung von Tun und Unterlassen", 10~ (1996)
- Sánchez, "Pflichtdelikt und Beteiligung-Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Einheitlichkeit der Zurechnung bei Tun und Unterlassen", 119~ (1999)
- Gallas, "Studien zum Unterlassungsdelikt", 67~ (1989)
- Kant, "Die Metaphysik der Sitten, in: Kant's gesammelte Schriften", 230~ (1914)
- Feuerbach, "Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland gultigen Peinlichen Rechts, 14. Aufl.", pp.50~51 (1986)
- 竹村和也, "救助義務と悪しきサマリア人の法", 同志社法学, 51(3), pp.66~
- Mill, "Utilitarianism", pp.247~ (1863)
- Wojciech Sadurski, "Economic Right and Basic Needs. in: Law, Right and Welfare State" (1986)
- Seelmann, "Paternalismus und solidaritätspflichten bei der Forschung am Menschen, in: FS-Schreiber", 865~866 (1999)
- Seelmann, "법과 도덕", 한양대 법학연구소 주최 강연문, pp.4~ (2006)
- Malm, "Liberalism, Bad Samaritan Laws, and Legal Paternalism", Ethics, 19(1) (1995)