자동차할부판매보증보험계약에서 주계약과 피보험자에 관한 연구 -서울고등법원 2011.7.12, 2010나67656 판결에 대한 비판-
A legal study on the main contract and insured in the Automobile installment sale guarantee insurance
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As regarding interpretation of the contents in the insurance policy, the motivation and background of the agreement, the final purpose of the agreement and the contract parties' true intention should be considered together. The main contract in a guarantee insurance is a legal relation- ship in which the policyholder of the guarantee insurance is liable to the insured for debts. A creditor in the main contract becomes the insured of the guarantee insurance and a debtor becomes the policyholder of the guarantee insurance contract. In this case, the main contract of the guarantee insurance is the contract for loan(consumer cash loan) between purchaser of the car and installment financing company(00 Life Insurance Company). At the same time, the insured of the guarantee insurance contract is the installment financing company who is in the position to shall suffer damage when a debtor fails to pay his debt. The conclusion of the Court in this case is wrong, considering the principles of general insurance and guarantee insurance contract.
Abstract
As regarding interpretation of the contents in the insurance policy, the motivation and background of the agreement, the final purpose of the agreement and the contract parties' true intention should be considered together. The main contract in a guarantee insurance is a legal relation- ship in which the policyholder of the guarantee insurance is liable to the insured for debts. A creditor in the main contract becomes the insured of the guarantee insurance and a debtor becomes the policyholder of the guarantee insurance contract. In this case, the main contract of the guarantee insurance is the contract for loan(consumer cash loan) between purchaser of the car and installment financing company(00 Life Insurance Company). At the same time, the insured of the guarantee insurance contract is the installment financing company who is in the position to shall suffer damage when a debtor fails to pay his debt. The conclusion of the Court in this case is wrong, considering the principles of general insurance and guarantee insurance contract.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김성태, "보험법강론" (2001), 법문사
- 박세민, "보험법" (2011), 박영사
- 서헌제, "상법강의(하)" (2002), 법문사
- 양승규, "보험법(제5판)" (2004), 삼지원
- 임용수, "보험법" (2006), 법률정보센터
- 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
- 정동윤, "상법(하)(제3판)" (2008), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(하)(제11판)" (2009), 박영사
- 최기원, "보험법(제3판)" (2002), 박영사
- 최준선, "보험법․해상법(제3판)" (2008), 삼영사
- 고평석, "보증보험약관상 구상권 규정의 유효론에 관한 재검토", 창원지방변호사회지, (2)
- 김성태, "보증보험계약의 성질", 상사판례연구, 2 (1996), 박영사
- 박용표, "판례상 나타난 보증보험의 법적 성질 및 구상권과 변제자대위권에 관하여", 판례연구, 15, 부산판례연구회
- 장덕조, "보증보험의 법적 성질에 대한 의문의 제기, In 보험법연구 4" (2002)
- 장덕조, "보증보험에서의 고지의무와 기망행위, In 보험법연구 5" (2003)
- 제철웅, "보증보험에 적용될 보증의 법리, In 민사법연구" (2004)
- 한지정, "보증보험의 법적 성질에 대한 연구", 상사법연구, 21(1), pp.20~625 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 홍성주, "보증보험에서 보험계약자의 사기를 이유로 보험계약이 취소된 경우 피보험자의 보험금청구권의 유무", 판례연구, 13, 부산판례연구회
- "자동차 할부판매보증보험 포괄계약에 관한 협약서", ~
- "할부판매보증보험 보통약관", ~
- "할부판매보증보험 특별약관", ~