2012年度 保險法 判例의 動向과 그 硏究
Study on the Insurance Law Cases of 2012
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to study and analyze some important cases held by the Korean Supreme in 2012. First, the issue is on the ‘severability of Interest theory’. Korean Supreme Court holds that it is possible for a liability policy to an additional insured even though there is no stipulation in policy about severability of interest, and a policy provision that refers to the insured is not applied collectively but severally. However, the broad application of the theory can create a complex situation that is difficult to deal with, and to produce an awesome result which conflicts with the principle of insurance law. Also there could be an ambuigity and troublesome if we keep on applying the theory broadly. I conclude that it must be confined to the limited area and the most ideal way is to revise the policy and then construe the revised policy literally. Second, the issue involves the duty of disclosure and multiple personal accident insurances. The insureds of the cases took insurances for the purpose of deceiving the insurer, and did not answer questions on the something important. The Supreme Court construed the related matters, and this paper clarified the holding. Third, guaranty insurance is an insurance that promises the debtor to indemnify the damage of the creditor which may arise in regard to the performance of obligation under contracts of sale, employment, works or others and receives from the debtor. Forth, the insurer’s subrogation right against third party are those of the insured himself. The court holds that the insurer’s rights are those of the insured, they can not be greater than themselves, and can not take precedence of the insured’s interest.
Abstract
This paper is to study and analyze some important cases held by the Korean Supreme in 2012. First, the issue is on the ‘severability of Interest theory’. Korean Supreme Court holds that it is possible for a liability policy to an additional insured even though there is no stipulation in policy about severability of interest, and a policy provision that refers to the insured is not applied collectively but severally. However, the broad application of the theory can create a complex situation that is difficult to deal with, and to produce an awesome result which conflicts with the principle of insurance law. Also there could be an ambuigity and troublesome if we keep on applying the theory broadly. I conclude that it must be confined to the limited area and the most ideal way is to revise the policy and then construe the revised policy literally. Second, the issue involves the duty of disclosure and multiple personal accident insurances. The insureds of the cases took insurances for the purpose of deceiving the insurer, and did not answer questions on the something important. The Supreme Court construed the related matters, and this paper clarified the holding. Third, guaranty insurance is an insurance that promises the debtor to indemnify the damage of the creditor which may arise in regard to the performance of obligation under contracts of sale, employment, works or others and receives from the debtor. Forth, the insurer’s subrogation right against third party are those of the insured himself. The court holds that the insurer’s rights are those of the insured, they can not be greater than themselves, and can not take precedence of the insured’s interest.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김광국, "손해보험약관 해석에 있어서의 개별적용의 이론", 상사법연구, 19(3) (2001), 한국상사법학회
- 김상준, "책임보험적 성격을 갖는 신원보증보험금 청구권의 소멸시효의 기산점", 대법원판례해설, (42) (2003)
- 김성태, "보험법강론" (2002), 법문사
- 김은경, "보험계약법상 고지의무 및 설명의무에 대한 비교법적 고찰", 경영법률, 19(2), pp.447~487 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
- 김홍엽, "보험금지급청구권의 소멸시효 기산점", 인권과 정의, (207) (1993)
- 양승규, "보험법" (2006), 삼지원
- 양승규, "피해자의 보험금 직접 청구권의 성질", 손해보험, (325) (1995), 손해보험협회
- 양승규, "보험판례연구" (2000), 삼지원
- 양승규, "복수피보험자에 대한 면책약관의 개별적용, In 보험판례연구" (2000), 삼지원
- 양승규, "보험법의 쟁점" (2000), 법문사
- 유태현, "자동차 손해배상보장법 제3조의 ‘자기를 위하여 운행하는 자’의 범위", 민사판례연구, 3 (1981), 민사판례연구회
- 이근우, "자동차종합보험 대물배상면책조항의 피보험자 개별적용, In 재판실무연구" (1998)
- 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
- 장덕조, "피보험자개별적용론", 상사법연구, 20(1) (2001), 한국상사법학회
- 장덕조, "答辯義務로서의 告知義務", 기업법연구, 25(2), pp.217~237 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 최병규, "외국의 개정 보험계약법과 고지의무의 나아갈 방향", 경영법률, 19(3), pp.91~116 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
- 최기원, "보험법" (2000), 박영사
- "Couch on Insurance" (2012)
- Kenneth S. Abraham, "Insurance Law and Regulation" (1990), The Foundation Press
- Robert E Keeton, "Insurancr Law" (1999), West Group
- Robert H. Jerry II, "Understanding Insurance Law" (1996), LexisNexis
- Römer, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz mit PfIVG und KfzPFIVV" (2003), C.H.Beck
- UK Law Commission, "Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 4" (2008), Insurable Interest
- "Westlaw On Line Data Base"[URL]
