자동차보험에서의 피보험자 개별적용 - 보상실무상의 적용을 중심으로 -
Applying Insurance Coverage Independently to the Insured in Automobile Insurance Compensation Affairs
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In automobile insurance policy which is the content of automobile insurance contract, the word "the insured" is generally defined in provisions of compensation liabilities and exception provisions. And then the scope of the insured is defined separately in extra provisions of each warranty. To make good use of automobile which is the benefit of civilization, the extend of compensation liability of automobile insurance is extended to the rate of practical use not only of the registered insured in the insurance policy but also someone of those are stipulated position or socially related people. The problem occurs whether the insured is an individual application or not. If there are the multiple insured who are liable to reparation in a car accident, the provisions of compensation liabilities and exclusions should be applied differently to each the insured because the insurable interest is individual and independent. There is no problem if the individual applications of the insured are expressly stipulated in insurance policy, but if there are not or partially stipulated in several provisions, it raises many contentions in compensation affairs. Each of the insured has his own insurable interest that all escape clauses shouldn't be interpreted as unconditional exception provisions. This research paper is focused on preventing the frequent confusions that resulted from the arbitrary constructions of the exception provisions in compensation affairs and on protecting the victims of the unilateral interpretations of the exception provisions by the insurers. Additionally, it should be considered to stipulate inclusively the individual applications of the insured as general provisions of the insurance policy to prevent interpretative confusion and to improve the problems.
Abstract
In automobile insurance policy which is the content of automobile insurance contract, the word "the insured" is generally defined in provisions of compensation liabilities and exception provisions. And then the scope of the insured is defined separately in extra provisions of each warranty. To make good use of automobile which is the benefit of civilization, the extend of compensation liability of automobile insurance is extended to the rate of practical use not only of the registered insured in the insurance policy but also someone of those are stipulated position or socially related people. The problem occurs whether the insured is an individual application or not. If there are the multiple insured who are liable to reparation in a car accident, the provisions of compensation liabilities and exclusions should be applied differently to each the insured because the insurable interest is individual and independent. There is no problem if the individual applications of the insured are expressly stipulated in insurance policy, but if there are not or partially stipulated in several provisions, it raises many contentions in compensation affairs. Each of the insured has his own insurable interest that all escape clauses shouldn't be interpreted as unconditional exception provisions. This research paper is focused on preventing the frequent confusions that resulted from the arbitrary constructions of the exception provisions in compensation affairs and on protecting the victims of the unilateral interpretations of the exception provisions by the insurers. Additionally, it should be considered to stipulate inclusively the individual applications of the insured as general provisions of the insurance policy to prevent interpretative confusion and to improve the problems.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김광국, "손해보험약관 해석에 있어서의 피보험자개별적용의 이론", 상사법연구, 19(3) (2001), 한국상사법학회
- 김광국, "자동차보험론", 전주대학교출판부, ~ (1999)
- 김광국, "자동차보험 대인배상Ⅱ의 면책규정에 관한 소고-피보험자개별적용을 중심으로", 보험개발연구, 통권 : 19호 (1996)
- 김광국, "한국의 자동차보험 면책범위에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1995
- 김교창, "복수의 피보험자에 대한 재해면책약관의 적용", 판례연구, 9 (1996), 서울지방변호사회편
- 김재환, "자동차보험 면책약관의 해석-복수의 피보험자에 대한 개별적용을 중심으로", 실무논단 (1998), 서울지방법원
- 김현록, "자동차보험상 피보험자개별적용에 관한 연구-대인배상Ⅱ를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2001
- 김철영, "피보험자 개별적용의 의미와 그 범위", 보험조사월보, 19(10) (1996)
- 남원식외6인 공저, "조문별해석 자동차보험약관" (1998), 한올출판사
- 박세민, "자동차보험법의 이론과 실무" (2007), 세창출판사
- 손지열, "자동차종합보험약관 해석상의 제문제 자동차사고로 인한 손해배상(상)", 재판자료, 20 (1984), 법원도서관
- 양승규, "보험법" (1994), 삼지원
- 양승규, "복수피보험자에 대한 면책약관의 개별적용", 월간손해보험, 통권 : 335호 (1996), 대한손해보험협회
- 유영일, "자동차대물배상책임보험과 복수피보험자에 대한 면책약관의 개별적용, 보험법연구Ⅲ" (1999), 삼지원
- 이태종, "피보험자가 복수인 경우 면책약관의 개별적용, 국민과 사법 : 윤관대법원장 퇴임기념" (1988), 박영사
- 장덕조, "보험법쟁점 연구Ⅰ" (2002), 법영사
- 장덕조, "피보험자 개별적용론에 대한 비판적 고찰-그 확대해석을 우려하며", 상사법연구, 20(1) (2001), 한국상사법학회
- 전현정, "자동차종합보험의 면책약관에 관한 고찰", 사법논집, 27 (1996)
- 정호열, "산재보험사고에 대한 자동차보험면책약관의 효력", 상사판례연구, 3 (1989), 한국상사판례학회
- 최병수, "자동차보험 손해사정이론과 실무" (2000), 현대정보문화사
- 최의호, "복수 피보험자에 대한 면책약관의 개별적용 여부", 재판과 판례, 8 (1998), 대구판례연구회
- 原口宏房, "保險者の免責-特定類型の被害者であることを事由とする", 自動車保險の法律問題, (3) (1991), 經濟法令硏究會
- 田邊康平 외 1인, "損害保險雙書", 自動車保險, 2, 文眞堂
