본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

저출산 현상에 대응한 사회보장정책의분석과 개선방향

Analysis and Improvement of Welfare Policy Program against Low Fertility

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Low fertility is recognized as the most modern social security problem. Low fertility is world trend. If total fertilityrate is 2.0 persons and under, the State put positive fertility promotion policy in force because the State should maintain total fertilityrate of 2.1 persons that preserves population uniformly of a nation. Low fertility reduces production possibility population and raises average labor ages, constricts saving, consumption, investment and makes drop economic growth ratio and national capacity. The total fertilityrate of Korea is 1.15 persons in 2009, this is level that don't come up to half of world average fertilityrate. Therefore it is about time instant and powerful policy is necessary and this situation is recognized as national extraordinary condition against low fertility In this study I intend to invest the cause and social influence of low fertility and analyse and assess directions and contents of welfare policy program of this government and suggest improvement plans. First, low fertility problem is not recognised as social problem or social liability problem, but as mere personal problem, the change of recognition to social problem is necessary. Second, fertility ratio problem is related to marriage values and children values, for these values form through long time, effect is difficult to be expected in short-term. Thus An eyes for long-term and macroscopic program is necessary. Third, present fertility promotion policy is accomplished by local government(as Si, Gun, Gu) thus unbalance between regions is brought about, finally this program bring about not increase of fertility ratio but transfer of population. Therefore fertility promotion policy should be accomplished on the basis of national business. Fourth, in this government object of fertility promotion program is limited to low income class. Several hundreds or thousands won never lead a person to give birth a child, instead it is better to support middle class to have ability to provide for their sons. Fifth, present fertility promotion program laid stress on several sons fertility. only one or two sons are expected to be born in a family because in keen competition culture several sons are hard to be kept up favorably. Sixth, social foundation to coexist both work and home is not enough, for familism is the centre of society in this country. woman's employment and childcare is the most direct factor to increase fertility. Seventh, the policy of Korean increase through elitism immgration program and inflow of overseas brothers is not proper to countermeasure to low fertility. And the others, mistake of population prospect and each fertility program on the basis of populism those are primary factor of low fertility.

Abstract

Low fertility is recognized as the most modern social security problem. Low fertility is world trend. If total fertilityrate is 2.0 persons and under, the State put positive fertility promotion policy in force because the State should maintain total fertilityrate of 2.1 persons that preserves population uniformly of a nation. Low fertility reduces production possibility population and raises average labor ages, constricts saving, consumption, investment and makes drop economic growth ratio and national capacity. The total fertilityrate of Korea is 1.15 persons in 2009, this is level that don't come up to half of world average fertilityrate. Therefore it is about time instant and powerful policy is necessary and this situation is recognized as national extraordinary condition against low fertility In this study I intend to invest the cause and social influence of low fertility and analyse and assess directions and contents of welfare policy program of this government and suggest improvement plans. First, low fertility problem is not recognised as social problem or social liability problem, but as mere personal problem, the change of recognition to social problem is necessary. Second, fertility ratio problem is related to marriage values and children values, for these values form through long time, effect is difficult to be expected in short-term. Thus An eyes for long-term and macroscopic program is necessary. Third, present fertility promotion policy is accomplished by local government(as Si, Gun, Gu) thus unbalance between regions is brought about, finally this program bring about not increase of fertility ratio but transfer of population. Therefore fertility promotion policy should be accomplished on the basis of national business. Fourth, in this government object of fertility promotion program is limited to low income class. Several hundreds or thousands won never lead a person to give birth a child, instead it is better to support middle class to have ability to provide for their sons. Fifth, present fertility promotion program laid stress on several sons fertility. only one or two sons are expected to be born in a family because in keen competition culture several sons are hard to be kept up favorably. Sixth, social foundation to coexist both work and home is not enough, for familism is the centre of society in this country. woman's employment and childcare is the most direct factor to increase fertility. Seventh, the policy of Korean increase through elitism immgration program and inflow of overseas brothers is not proper to countermeasure to low fertility. And the others, mistake of population prospect and each fertility program on the basis of populism those are primary factor of low fertility.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 국회 예산정책처, "저출산 고령사회 대책의 재정분석" (2009)
  2. 김승권, "저출산과 사회경제적 문제점", 대한산부인과학회 학술대회 (2004)
  3. 김태헌, "가치관의 변화와 저출산", 보건복지포럼, (102) (2005)
  4. 남기동, "저출산 원인과 보육 및 육아지원 정책의 방향", 복지행정연구, (21) (2005)
  5. 류덕현, "출산율 및 여성고용 제고 정책이 성장잠재력에 미치는 영향", 저출산 극복 및 성장잠재력 확충을 취한 가족정책 정책토론회 (2007), 한국조세연구원
  6. 백선희, "사회적 위기, 저출산의 원인과 대책", 복지동향, (74) (2004), 참여연대 사회복지위원회
  7. 백정현, "저출산 사회극복을 위한 복지정책 개선방안", 한국행정사학회지, (16) (2005), ,
  8. 보건복지가족부 국민연금재정추계위원회, "국민연금 장기재정 추계" (2008)
  9. 안명옥, "출산율 제고를 위한 정책 과제, 2004년 국정감사자료" (2004)
  10. 이미란, "출산 장려 정책이 미혼 여성들의 출산 양육 동기에 미치는 영향", 한국가족복지학, 14(3), pp.75~96 (2009), 한국가족복지학회
  11. 이삼식, "저출산의 원인구조와 정책방향", 보건복지포럼, (111) (2006), ,
  12. 이인숙, "저출산의 요인분석과 사회복지적 함의", 한국사회복지학, 57(4), pp.67~90 (2005), 한국사회복지학회
  13. 임상규, "출산장려정책의 경제적 도구 선택을 위한 효과성 비교 연구", 2007년 한국정책학회 하계학술대회 (2007)
  14. 조복희, "우리나라 저출산 현황과 그 요인", 한국유아교육학회, (46) (2009)
  15. 통계청, "2009 한국 사회지표" (2009)
  16. 통계청, "국제통계연감" (2005)
  17. 한국개발연구원, "고령화의 파급효과와 대응과제" (2007)
  18. 大橋洋一, "行政法學의 構造的變革, 有斐閣" (1996)
  19. Sleebos, Joelle E., "Low Fertilityin OECD Contries: Facts and Policy Responses, OECD Social", Employment and Migration Working Papers, 15 (2003)
  20. UN, "Population Perspectives" (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)