본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Significance of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Surgeon Study

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for prostate cancer (PCa) is beneficial in terms of surgical outcomes and for preventing or delaying biochemical recurrence via single-surgeon case series study. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three men underwent RRP by a single surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not NHT was performed prior to RRP. The study was analyzed retrospectively. We evaluated clinical parameters,surgical parameters, and biochemical recurrence rate. Group 1 (n=34) was treated with RRP only, while Group 2 (n=19) underwent RRP along with NHT. Results: There were no significant differences in clinical, operation-related and pathological factors between the two groups (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference in biochemical recurrence rate between the two groups at the last follow-up, although Group 2 tended to have a lower PCa recurrence rate than Group 1 and the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was significantly higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (p=0.0496). Conclusion: The present single-surgeon case series study revealed a trend toward a lower rate of PCa recurrence in NHT+RRP treated patients compared to those treated with RRP alone, but this did not reach statistical significance, despite the fact that NHT+RRP patients exhibited higher serum PSA levels preoperatively. Prospective studies with a longer duration of observation and a greater number of patients would be helpful in evaluating NHT more definitively.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for prostate cancer (PCa) is beneficial in terms of surgical outcomes and for preventing or delaying biochemical recurrence via single-surgeon case series study. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three men underwent RRP by a single surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not NHT was performed prior to RRP. The study was analyzed retrospectively. We evaluated clinical parameters,surgical parameters, and biochemical recurrence rate. Group 1 (n=34) was treated with RRP only, while Group 2 (n=19) underwent RRP along with NHT. Results: There were no significant differences in clinical, operation-related and pathological factors between the two groups (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference in biochemical recurrence rate between the two groups at the last follow-up, although Group 2 tended to have a lower PCa recurrence rate than Group 1 and the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was significantly higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (p=0.0496). Conclusion: The present single-surgeon case series study revealed a trend toward a lower rate of PCa recurrence in NHT+RRP treated patients compared to those treated with RRP alone, but this did not reach statistical significance, despite the fact that NHT+RRP patients exhibited higher serum PSA levels preoperatively. Prospective studies with a longer duration of observation and a greater number of patients would be helpful in evaluating NHT more definitively.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Fujikawa K, "Prognostic criteria in patients with prostate cancer: Gleason score versus volume-weighted mean nuclear volume", Clin Cancer Res, 3, pp.613~618 (1997)
  2. Chautard D, "Biochemical monitoring of prostate cancer treated exclusively by radiotherapy: prognostic value of pretreatment PSA, PSA nadir and PSA half-life", Prog Urol, 12, pp.421~428 (2002)
  3. Kawamorita N, "Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: biochemical outcome", Int J Urol, 16, pp.733~738 (2009)
  4. D’Amico AV, "Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer", JAMA, 280, pp.969~974 (1998)
  5. Quaranta BP, "Comparing radical prostatectomy and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer", Oncology, 18, pp.1289~1302 (2004)
  6. Maluta S, "Treatment for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: controversial issues and the role of hyperthermia", Int J Hyperthermia, 26, pp.765~774 (2010)
  7. Milecki P, "Radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy (RT-HT) in prostate cancer patients with low, intermediate, and high risk of biochemical recurrence: perspective and therapeutic gain analysis", Neoplasma, 54, pp.7~15 (2007)
  8. Ide H, "Prognostic stratification in patients who received hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy", Jpn J Clin Oncol, 40, pp.177~180 (2010)
  9. Mendenhall WM, "Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Definitive Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer", Am J Clin Oncol (2011)
  10. Kumar S, "Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD006019~ (2006)
  11. Konski A, "Long-term hormone therapy and radiation is cost-effective for patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma", Cancer, 106, pp.51~57 (2006)
  12. Watson R, "Is there a role for induction androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy?", Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 10, pp.627~641 (1996)
  13. Messing EM, "Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy", Lancet Oncol, 7, pp.472~479 (2006)
  14. Van Poppel H, "Neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy: how and when?", Eur Urol Suppl, 7, pp.747~751 (2008)
  15. Peters N, "Racial differences in prostate cancer treatment outcomes: a systematic review", Cancer Nurs, 28, pp.108~118 (2005)
  16. Jani AB, "Early prostate cancer: clinical decision-making", Lancet, 361, pp.1045~1053 (2003)
  17. Marusić G, "Treatment of locally advanced prostatic cancer", Med Pregl, 63, pp.689~695 (2010)
  18. Abraham N, "Decrease in racial disparities in the staging evaluation for prostate cancer after publication of staging guidelines", J Urol, 178, pp.82~87 (2007)
  19. Kattan MW, "Pretreatment nomogram for predicting the outcome of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer", J Clin Oncol, 18, pp.3352~3359 (2000)
  20. Partin AW, "Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium", Urology, 58, pp.843~848 (2001)
  21. Lawrentschuk N, "Role of surgery in high-risk localized prostate cancer", Curr Oncol, 17(2), pp.S25~S32 (2010)
  22. Neill MG, "Does intrafascial dissection during nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compromise cancer control?", BJU Int, 104, pp.1730~1733 (2009)
  23. Tanaka N, "Risk-stratified survival rates and predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in a Nara, Japan, cohort study", Int J Clin Oncol, 16, pp.553~559 (2011)
  24. Spahn M, "Long-term outcome of patients with high-risk prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy and stage-dependent adjuvant androgen deprivation", Urol Int, 84, pp.164~173 (2010)
  25. Selli C, "Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation before radical prostatectomy. A review", Minerva Urol Nefrol, 56, pp.165~171 (2004)
  26. Hachiya T, "A retrospective study of the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer by six institutions in eastern and north-eastern Japan", BJU Int, 95, pp.534~540 (2005)
  27. Shelley MD, "A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate carcinoma", Cancer Treat Rev, 35, pp.9~17 (2009)
  28. Divrik RT, "Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens", Urol Oncol, 25, pp.376~382 (2007)
  29. Matikainen MP, "The depth of the prostatic apex is an independent predictor of positive apical margins at radical prostatectomy", BJU Int, 106, pp.622~626 (2010)
  30. Mason BM, "The role of preoperative endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in predicting surgical difficulty for robotic prostatectomy", Urology, 76, pp.1130~1135 (2010)
  31. 유달산, "Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer", Korean Journal of Urology, 51(9), pp.589~595 (2010), 대한비뇨기과학회
  32. Sumitomo M, "Efficacy of short-term androgen deprivation with high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of prostate cancer in Japan", Urology, 72, pp.1335~1340 (2008)
  33. Petraki CD, "Histopathological changes induced by therapies in the benign prostate and prostate adenocarcinoma", Histol Histopathol, 22, pp.107~118 (2007)
  34. Polito M, "Effects of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy on prostatic cancer", Eur Urol, 30(1), pp.26~31 (1996)
  35. Maldonado-Valadez R, "The impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on the outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a matched pair analysis", J Urol, 175, pp.2092~2096 (2006)
  36. 양승우, "Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Preceding Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Early Postoperative Complications and Biochemical Recurrence", Korean Journal of Urology, 52(1), pp.19~23 (2011), 대한비뇨기과학회
  37. Kassabian VS, "Possible mechanism for seeding of tumor during radical prostatectomy", J Urol, 150, pp.1169~1171 (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

Impact of Early Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis고동훈, 나군호, 박재원, 장원식, 최영득, 함원식, 홍성준연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2018 · 제59권 제5호Continence Rate and Oncological Feasibility after Total Transurethral Resection of the Prostate as an Alternative Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study권동득, 정희종대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2011 · 제15권 제4호Oncological and functional outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at a single institution: a minimum 5-year follow-up강준구, 권태균, 김범수, 김태환, 김현태, 윤길숙, 이준녕, 정재욱, 천소영, 최석환, 하윤석영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2018 · 제35권 제2호Biopsy Related Prostate Status Does Not Affect on the Clinicopathological Outcome of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy천준, 최훈, 강석호, 강성구, 고영휘, 박홍석, Vipul R. Patel대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2009 · 제41권 제4호Optimal PSA Threshold for Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer following Radical Prostatectomy and Adjuvant Radiation Therapy구교철, 김대호, 나군호, 안현규, 이광석, 정병하, 홍성준연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2020 · 제61권 제8호Comparison of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis김대근, 나군호, 서현주, 손수경, 이나래, 이선희연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2016 · 제57권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)