본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: To systematically update evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versusretropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Electronic databases, including ovidMEDLINE, ovidEMBASE, the Cochrane Library, KoreaMed, KMbase, and others, were searched, collecting data from January 1980 to August 2013. The quality of selected systematic reviews was assessed using the revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews and the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for non-randomized studies. Results: A total of 61 studies were included, including 38 from two previous systematic reviews rated as best available evidence and 23 additional studies that were more recent. There were no randomized controlled trials. Regarding safety, the risk of complications was lower for RARP than for RRP. Among functional outcomes, the risk of urinary incontinence was lower and potency rate was significantlyhigher for RARP than for RRP. Regarding oncologic outcomes, positive margin rates were comparable between groups, and although biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates were lower for RARP than for RRP, recurrence-free survival was similar after long-term follow up. Conclusion: RARP might be favorable to RRP in regards to post-operative complications, peri-operative outcomes, and functional outcomes. Positive margin and BCR rates were comparable between the two procedures. As most of studies were of low quality, the results presented should be interpreted with caution, and further high quality studies controlling for selection, confounding, and selective reporting biases with longer-term follow-up are needed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of RARP.

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically update evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versusretropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Electronic databases, including ovidMEDLINE, ovidEMBASE, the Cochrane Library, KoreaMed, KMbase, and others, were searched, collecting data from January 1980 to August 2013. The quality of selected systematic reviews was assessed using the revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews and the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for non-randomized studies. Results: A total of 61 studies were included, including 38 from two previous systematic reviews rated as best available evidence and 23 additional studies that were more recent. There were no randomized controlled trials. Regarding safety, the risk of complications was lower for RARP than for RRP. Among functional outcomes, the risk of urinary incontinence was lower and potency rate was significantlyhigher for RARP than for RRP. Regarding oncologic outcomes, positive margin rates were comparable between groups, and although biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates were lower for RARP than for RRP, recurrence-free survival was similar after long-term follow up. Conclusion: RARP might be favorable to RRP in regards to post-operative complications, peri-operative outcomes, and functional outcomes. Positive margin and BCR rates were comparable between the two procedures. As most of studies were of low quality, the results presented should be interpreted with caution, and further high quality studies controlling for selection, confounding, and selective reporting biases with longer-term follow-up are needed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of RARP.

참고문헌 (91)

  1. Yates DR, "From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology", BJU Int, 108, pp.1708~1713 (2011)
  2. 나군호, "Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy", Investigative and Clinical Urology, 50(2), pp.97~104 (2009), 대한비뇨기과학회
  3. Heidenreich A, "EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease", Eur Urol, 59, pp.61~71 (2011)
  4. Hakimi AA, "Minimally invasive approaches to prostate cancer: a review of the current literature", Urol J, 4, pp.130~137 (2007)
  5. Kang DC, "Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a systematic review of the published literature", Eur Urol, 57, pp.930~937 (2010)
  6. Safety and Effectiveness of Robot Surgery, "Shin CM", National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, ~ (2011)
  7. Moran PS, "Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open and laparoscopic approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Int J Urol, 20, pp.312~321 (2013)
  8. 김윤, "4대 중증질환 보장성 강화정책의 평가", 대한의사협회지, 57(3), pp.198~203 (2014), 대한의사협회[DOI]
  9. "Using existing systematic reviews to replace de novo processes in conducting comparative effectiveness reviews 2013"[URL]
  10. "Health technology assessment of robot-assisted surgery in selected surgical procedures 2011"[URL]
  11. Ramsay C, "Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer", Health Technol Assess, 16, pp.1~313 (2012)
  12. Kung J, "From systematic reviews to clinical recommendations for evidence-based health care: validation of revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews (R-AMSTAR) for grading of clinical relevance", Open Dent J, 4, pp.84~91 (2010)
  13. DerSimonian R, "Meta-analysis in clinical trials", Control Clin Trials, 7, pp.177~188 (1986)
  14. Mantel N, "Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease", J Natl Cancer Inst, 22, pp.719~748 (1959)
  15. Schroll JB, "Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study", BMC Med Res Methodol, 11, pp.22~ (2011)
  16. Egger M, "Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test", BMJ, 315, pp.629~634 (1997)
  17. Tewari A, "A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution", BJU Int, 92, pp.205~210 (2003)
  18. Drouin SJ, "Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer", World J Urol, 27, pp.599~605 (2009)
  19. Ou YC, "Comparison of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon", Anticancer Res, 29, pp.1637~1642 (2009)
  20. Barocas DA, "Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer:comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival", J Urol, 183, pp.990~996 (2010)
  21. Loeb S, "Benign prostate glands at the bladder neck margin in robotic vs open radical prostatectomy", BJU Int, 105, pp.1446~1449 (2010)
  22. Hu JC, "Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy", JAMA, 302, pp.1557~1564 (2009)
  23. Clinical effectiveness and safety of robotic surgery, "Lee SH", National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, ~ (2014)
  24. Novara G, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 62, pp.431~452 (2012)
  25. Rocco B, "Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis", BJU Int, 104, pp.991~995 (2009)
  26. Fracalanza S, "Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study", BJU Int, 101, pp.1145~1149 (2008)
  27. Tomaszewski JJ, "Comparative hospital cost-analysis of open and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy", Urology, 80, pp.126~129 (2012)
  28. Nakamura LY, "Different approaches to an inguinal hernia repair during a simultaneous robot-assisted radical prostatectomy", J Endourol, 25, pp.621~624 (2011)
  29. Ficarra V, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 62, pp.405~417 (2012)
  30. Haglind E, "Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial", Eur Urol, 68, pp.216~225 (2015)
  31. Costello AJ, "Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves", BJU Int, 94, pp.1071~1076 (2004)
  32. McGlynn B, "Management of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy", Urol Nurs, 24, pp.475~482 (2004)
  33. Moore KN, "Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: can men at risk be identified preoperatively?", J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 34, pp.270~279 (2007)
  34. Iseki R, "Urinary incontinence in early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomycomparison with radical retropubic prostatectomy", Hinyokika Kiyo, 58, pp.409~414 (2012)
  35. Hohwü L, "A short-term cost-effectiveness study comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy", J Med Econ, 14, pp.403~409 (2011)
  36. Milsom I, "Global prevalence and economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence: a systematic review", Eur Urol, 65, pp.79~95 (2014)
  37. Jannini EA, "Health-related characteristics and unmet needs of men with erectile dysfunction: a survey in five European countries", J Sex Med, 11, pp.40~50 (2014)
  38. Tewari A, "Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 62, pp.1~15 (2012)
  39. Kim J, "Disparities in the receipt of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy:between-hospital and within-hospital analysis using 2009-2011California inpatient data", BMJ Open, 5, pp.e007409~ (2015)
  40. Jackson MA, "Experienced open vs early robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 10-year prospective and retrospective comparison", Urology, 91, pp.111~118 (2016)
  41. Heidenreich A, "EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer", Eur Urol, 65, pp.467~479 (2014)
  42. Novara G, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 62, pp.382~404 (2012)
  43. Ahlering TE, "Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes", Urology, 63, pp.819~822 (2004)
  44. Breyer BN, "Incidence of bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy", BJU Int, 106, pp.1734~1738 (2010)
  45. 추민수, "Impact of Prostate Volume on Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Open Retropubic", Investigative and Clinical Urology, 54(1), pp.15~21 (2013), 대한비뇨기과학회
  46. Coronato EE, "A multi-institutional comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy, radical perineal prostatectomy, and robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for treatment of localized prostate cancer", J Robotic Surg, 3, pp.175~178 (2009)
  47. Di Pierro GB, "A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload", Eur Urol, 59, pp.1~6 (2011)
  48. Doumerc N, "Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to ro-botic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years", BJU Int, 106, pp.378~384 (2010)
  49. Froehner M, "Perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy: open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach", Urol Int, 90, pp.312~315 (2013)
  50. Ham WS, "Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy: a prospective analysis based on a single surgeon’s experience", J Robotic Surg, 2, pp.235~241 (2008)
  51. Hong H, "Effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on surgical pathology specimens", Diagn Pathol, 7, pp.24~ (2012)
  52. Kordan Y, "Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy", BJU Int, 106, pp.1036~1040 (2010)
  53. Krambeck AE, "Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques", BJU Int, 103, pp.448~453 (2009)
  54. Laurila TA, "Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients", Urol Oncol, 27, pp.529~533 (2009)
  55. Lo KL, "Short-term outcome of patients with robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy:for localised carcinoma of prostate", Hong Kong Med J, 16, pp.31~35 (2010)
  56. Ludovico GM, "Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients", Oncol Rep, 29, pp.2445~2450 (2013)
  57. Magheli A, "Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching", BJU Int, 107, pp.1956~1962 (2011)
  58. Nadler RB, "Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up", J Robotic Surg, 3, pp.201~207 (2010)
  59. Philippou P, "Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon", J Endourol, 26, pp.1002~1008 (2012)
  60. Punnen S, "How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?", BJU Int, 112, pp.E314~E320 (2013)
  61. Schroeck FR, "Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrencefree survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy", BJU Int, 102, pp.28~32 (2008)
  62. Silberstein JL, "A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons", BJU Int, 111, pp.206~212 (2013)
  63. Smith JA Jr, "A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy", J Urol, 178, pp.2385~2389 (2007)
  64. Uvin P, "A comparison of the perioperative data after open radical retropubic prostatectomy or robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy", Acta Chir Belg, 110, pp.313~316 (2010)
  65. Wang R, "Risk factors and quality of life for post-prostatectomy vesicourethral anastomotic stenoses", Urology, 79, pp.449~457 (2012)
  66. White MA, "Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?", Urology, 73, pp.567~571 (2009)
  67. Williams SB, "Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s)", Urology, 76, pp.1097~1101 (2010)
  68. Wood DP, "Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy", Urology, 70, pp.945~949 (2007)
  69. Ficarra V, "A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution", BJU Int, 104, pp.534~539 (2009)
  70. Kim SC, "Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic", Eur Urol, 60, pp.413~419 (2011)
  71. Burgess SV, "Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy", J Endourol, 20, pp.827~830 (2006)
  72. D’Alonzo RC, "A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy", J Clin Anesth, 21, pp.322~328 (2009)
  73. Durand X, "Retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted total prostatectomies: comparison of postoperative course and histological and functional results based on a series of 86 prostatectomies", Prog Urol, 18, pp.60~67 (2008)
  74. Farnham SB, "Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy", Urology, 67, pp.360~363 (2006)
  75. Nelson B, "Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy", J Urol, 177, pp.929~931 (2007)
  76. Ball AJ, "Prospective longitudinal comparative study of early healthrelated quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer: a short-term evaluation of five approaches from a single institution", J Endourol, 20, pp.723~731 (2006)
  77. Bolenz C, "Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer", Eur Urol, 57, pp.453~458 (2010)
  78. Bolenz C, "The influence of body mass index on the cost of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer", BJU Int, 106, pp.1188~1193 (2010)
  79. Carlsson S, "Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden", Urology, 75, pp.1092~1097 (2010)
  80. Chan RC, "Effect of a large prostate gland on open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy", BJU Int, 101, pp.1140~1144 (2008)
  81. Malcolm JB, "Quality of life after open or robotic prostatectomy, cryoablation or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer", J Urol, 183, pp.1822~1828 (2010)
  82. Miller J, "Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy", J Urol, 178(3 Pt 1), pp.854~858 (2007)
  83. Truesdale MD, "Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robotassisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era", J Endourol, 24, pp.1055~1060 (2010)
  84. 최대헌, "Clinical Experience with Limited Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer in Korea: Single Center Comparison of 247 Open and 354 Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Series", Investigative and Clinical Urology, 53(11), pp.755~760 (2012), 대한비뇨기과학회
  85. Gainsburg DM, "Intraoperative management of robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy", JSLS, 14, pp.1~5 (2010)
  86. Lallas CD, "Comparison of lymph node yield in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with that in open radical retropubic prostatectomy", BJU Int, 107, pp.1136~1140 (2011)
  87. Martinschek A, "Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis", J Endourol, 26, pp.1136~1141 (2012)
  88. Minniti D, "Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based comparison", Technol Health Care, 19, pp.331~339 (2011)
  89. Mirza M, "A comparison of radical perineal, radical retropubic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies in a single surgeon series", Prostate Cancer, 2011, pp.878323~ (2011)
  90. 나효석, "로봇을 이용한 근치적전립선적출술의 마취에 관한 고찰: 근치적치골후전립선적출술과 비교", Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 4(4), pp.364~367 (2009), 대한마취통증의학회
  91. Froehner M, "Urinary tract-related quality of life after radical prostatectomy:open retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach", Urol Int, 90, pp.36~40 (2013)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)