Oncological and functional outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at a single institution: a minimum 5-year follow-up
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: To evaluate mid-term oncological and functional outcomes in patients with prostate cancer treated by robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 128 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RALP at our institution between February 2008 and April 2010. All patients enrolled in this study were followed up for at least 5 years. We analyzed biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and predictive factors for BCR using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Continence recovery rate, defined as no use of urinary pads, was also evaluated. Results: Based on the D’Amico risk classification, there were 30 low-risk patients (23.4%), 47 intermediaterisk patients (38.8%), and 51 high-risk patients (39.8%), preoperatively. Based on pathological findings, 50.0% of patients (64/128) showed non-organ confined disease (≥T3a) and 26.6% (34/128) had high grade disease (Gleason score ≥8). During a median follow-up period of 71 months (range, 66-78 months), the frequency of BCR was 33.6% (43/128) and the median BCR-free survival was 65.9 (0.4-88.0) months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that high grade disease (Gleason score ≥8) was an independent predictor for BCR (hazard ratio=4.180, 95% confidence interval=1.02-17.12, p=0.047). In addition, a majority of patients remained continent following the RALP procedure, without the need for additional intervention for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated acceptable outcomes following an initial RALP procedure, despite 50% of the patients investigated demonstrating high-risk features associated with non-organ confined disease.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate mid-term oncological and functional outcomes in patients with prostate cancer treated by robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 128 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RALP at our institution between February 2008 and April 2010. All patients enrolled in this study were followed up for at least 5 years. We analyzed biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and predictive factors for BCR using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Continence recovery rate, defined as no use of urinary pads, was also evaluated. Results: Based on the D’Amico risk classification, there were 30 low-risk patients (23.4%), 47 intermediaterisk patients (38.8%), and 51 high-risk patients (39.8%), preoperatively. Based on pathological findings, 50.0% of patients (64/128) showed non-organ confined disease (≥T3a) and 26.6% (34/128) had high grade disease (Gleason score ≥8). During a median follow-up period of 71 months (range, 66-78 months), the frequency of BCR was 33.6% (43/128) and the median BCR-free survival was 65.9 (0.4-88.0) months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that high grade disease (Gleason score ≥8) was an independent predictor for BCR (hazard ratio=4.180, 95% confidence interval=1.02-17.12, p=0.047). In addition, a majority of patients remained continent following the RALP procedure, without the need for additional intervention for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated acceptable outcomes following an initial RALP procedure, despite 50% of the patients investigated demonstrating high-risk features associated with non-organ confined disease.
참고문헌 (17)
- Siegel RL, "Cancer statistics, 2015", CA Cancer J Clin, 65, pp.5~29 (2015)
- Han HH, "Epidemiology of prostate cancer in South Korea", Prostate Int, 3, pp.99~102 (2015)
- Chopra S, "Robotic radical prostatectomy:the new gold standard", Arab J Urol, 10, pp.23~31 (2012)
- D’Amico AV, "Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era", J Clin Oncol, 21, pp.2163~2172 (2003)
- Luciani LG, "Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparative analysis of the surgical outcomes in a single regional center", Curr Urol, 11, pp.36~41 (2017)
- Nossiter J, "Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England", Br J Cancer, 118, pp.489~494 (2018)
- Haglind E, "Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial", Eur Urol, 68, pp.216~225 (2015)
- Kang YJ, "Impact of lymphovascular invasion on lymph node metastasis for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with negative resection margin", BMC Cancer, 17, pp.321~ (2017)
- Menon M, "Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up", Eur Urol, 58, pp.838~846 (2010)
- Rajan P, "Oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a large European single-centre cohort with median 10-year follow-up", Eur Urol Focus, 4, pp.351~359 (2018)
- Sooriakumaran P, "Biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a European single-centre cohort with a minimum follow-up time of 5 years", Eur Urol, 62, pp.768~774 (2012)
- 이선희, "Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has lower biochemical recurrence than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis", Investigative and Clinical Urology, 58(5), pp.383~383 (2017), 대한비뇨의학회[DOI]
- Abdel Raheem A, "Stratified analysis of 800 Asian patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a median 64months of follow up", Int J Urol, 23, pp.765~774 (2016)
- Diaz M, "Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 67, pp.1168~1176 (2015)
- Shao IH, "Predictors of short-term and long-term incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy", J Int Med Res, 46, pp.421~429 (2018)
- Kadono Y, "Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy:nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence", Neurourol Urodyn, 35, pp.1034~1039 (2016)
- Masashi Honda, "A prognostic model for predicting urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy", The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 13(3), pp.e1780~ (2017), Wiley[DOI]