China’s Position on the Territorial Sea Regime in Terms of the South China Sea Disputes: Straight Baselines and Innocent Passage of Warships around Disputed Islands
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
China has a long coastline of approximately 18,000 kilometers and hence an extensive continental shelf as well as an EEZ. Its coastline is said to be the tenth longest coastline in the world. The total sea area in the China Seas is about 4.7 million square kilometers. Despite these advantageous circumstances in geography, China failed to become a maritime power like Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands and the UK. So it remained a land power for a long time except when Zheng He, the great seafarer in Chinese history, led the greatest ocean-going eets of the world of that time, sailing to the Pacic and Indian Oceans during the years of 1405–1433. As a result, China suffered foreign invasions several times from the sea, being defeated in the Opium War as well as at the Sino–Japanese War in the nineteenth century. It is only natural that China has opposed the traditional freedom of the seas claimed by the maritime powers since the foundation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. When China took part in all the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) sessions, its policy and position on the major issues were almost identical with those of the developing countries: creeping jurisdiction policy. With regard to the breadth of the territorial sea, China supported and complied with the 12 nautical mile territorial sea. It has established straight baselines since it proclaimed territorial sea in 1958. Also it argued that several disputed islands were its territories by the 1958 declaration as well as by the 1992 law on the territorial sea. China’s policy on the law of the sea, however, might change dramatically in accordance with the general trends of the law of the sea. China ratied the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC) in 1996, 14 years after signing it. Thus China has committed itself to developing its domestic laws and regulations on maritime affairs in accordance with the 1982 LOSC and to meet the demands and changed circumstances in the use of oceans. Given the foregoing, this paper attempts to provide China’s policy on the territorial sea in the context of its change in the law of the sea. To be more specific, it examines relevant issues on the breadth of the territorial sea, baselines as well as innocent passage of warships in terms of U.S.–China relations, with special emphasis on the comparison with Korea’s relevant policy on the law of the sea.
Abstract
China has a long coastline of approximately 18,000 kilometers and hence an extensive continental shelf as well as an EEZ. Its coastline is said to be the tenth longest coastline in the world. The total sea area in the China Seas is about 4.7 million square kilometers. Despite these advantageous circumstances in geography, China failed to become a maritime power like Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands and the UK. So it remained a land power for a long time except when Zheng He, the great seafarer in Chinese history, led the greatest ocean-going eets of the world of that time, sailing to the Pacic and Indian Oceans during the years of 1405–1433. As a result, China suffered foreign invasions several times from the sea, being defeated in the Opium War as well as at the Sino–Japanese War in the nineteenth century. It is only natural that China has opposed the traditional freedom of the seas claimed by the maritime powers since the foundation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. When China took part in all the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) sessions, its policy and position on the major issues were almost identical with those of the developing countries: creeping jurisdiction policy. With regard to the breadth of the territorial sea, China supported and complied with the 12 nautical mile territorial sea. It has established straight baselines since it proclaimed territorial sea in 1958. Also it argued that several disputed islands were its territories by the 1958 declaration as well as by the 1992 law on the territorial sea. China’s policy on the law of the sea, however, might change dramatically in accordance with the general trends of the law of the sea. China ratied the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC) in 1996, 14 years after signing it. Thus China has committed itself to developing its domestic laws and regulations on maritime affairs in accordance with the 1982 LOSC and to meet the demands and changed circumstances in the use of oceans. Given the foregoing, this paper attempts to provide China’s policy on the territorial sea in the context of its change in the law of the sea. To be more specific, it examines relevant issues on the breadth of the territorial sea, baselines as well as innocent passage of warships in terms of U.S.–China relations, with special emphasis on the comparison with Korea’s relevant policy on the law of the sea.
참고문헌 (37)
- Kim Chan-kyu, "Repercussions of China–Japan Fishing Boat Seizure", Kukmin Ilbo, ~ (2010)
- "Donga-Ilbo", ~
- "Chosun Ilbo, October 7, 2010", ~ (2010)
- "An American Warship Sails Through Disputed Waters in the South China Sea", The Economist, ~ (2015)
- "Bombers in the South China Sea: Beijing Grows Its Military Presence on Disputed Islands", The Wall Street Journal, ~ (2018)
- "U.S. Warns of Ability to Take Down Chinese Artificial Islands", CNN Politics, ~ (2018)
- "U.S. Will ‘Compete Vigorously’ in South China Sea, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis Warns Beijing", SCMP, ~ (2018)
- Zou Keyuan, "China’s Marine Legal System and the Law of the Sea" (2005), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
- Masakatsu Miyazaki, "Zheng He’s Great Expedition to the South Sea: Reorganization of the World Order by the Yongle Emperor" (2007), Chukoshinsho
- Gao Zhi-Guo, "China and the LOS Convention", Marine Policy, 15(3), pp.199~200 (1991)
- Gong Ying-Chun, "China’s Practice and Theory on the Law of the Sea", Treatises on Law and Politics, (43) (1999)
- Lee Shi-Hao, "History of Chinese Fishery", pp.19~24 (1937), Shangwuyinshuguan
- Study of China’s Maritime Policy and Legal System, "Maritime Policy Research Foundation", ~ (2006)
- Wang Hu-Hua, "Study of International Public Law" (2005), Beijing University Publishing House
- Tao Cheng, "Communist China and the Law of the Sea", American Journal of International Law, 63 (1969)
- Tadao Kuribayashi, "Report on the East Asia and Law of the Sea Symposium", Maritime Journal, (35), pp.10~ (1984)
- 이창위, "중국의 도서와 해양경계 문제", 국제법학회논총, 54(1), pp.129~153 (2009), 대한국제법학회
- "Article 4 of the Territorial Sea Declaration", ~
- Jeanette Greenfield, "China’s Practice in the Law of the Sea" (1992), Oxford University Press
- "Law on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone", ~
- Liyu Wang, "The New Legal Regime for China’s Territorial Sea", Ocean Development & International Law, 25 (1994)
- Kiyoshi Inoue, "Senkaku Islands" (1996), Daisanshokann
- Kim Charn-kiu, "The Territorial Sea Law of China and the Baseline", Korean Journal of International Law, 39(1), pp.34~35 (1994)
- Gao Jian-Jun, "China and International Law of the Sea" (2004), Maritime Publishing House
- R. R. Churchill, "The Law of the Sea" (1999), Juris Publishing
- W. Michael Reisman, "Straight Base Lines in Maritime Boundary Delimitation", pp.95~97 (1992), Palgrave Macmillan
- Masahiro Miyoshi, "What Is State Practice? With Special Reference to Straight Baselines", The Law of the Sea, Dispute Settlement, and Colonialism in International Law (Occasional Paper of the 2010 DILA International Conference) (2010)
- ICJ Reports, , 116~144 (1951)
- "Article 7 of the UNCLOS", ~
- Chiyuki Mizukami, "Law of the Sea", pp.27~28 (2005)
- Working Paper on Sea Area within the Limits of National Jurisdiction, , ~ (1973)
- Zou Keyuan, "China’s Marine Legal System and the Law of the Sea" (2005), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
- Yann-Huei Song, "Maritime Legislation of Mainland China and Taiwan: Developments, Comparison, Implications, and Potential Challenges for the United States", Ocean Development & International Law, 31, pp.308~ (2000)
- E. D. Brown, "The International Law of the Sea, Volume I Introductory Manual", pp.71~72 (1994), Dartmouth Publishing
- Michael McDevitt, "PLA Navy Build Up and Implications for U.S. Strategy in East Asia and for the U.S. Navy", a paper presented at the Second Annual CAN–KIMS Conference on ROK Navy and U.S. Navy Cooperation, pp.362~363 (2008)
