중국의 해양경계선과 그 획정방법에 관한 국제법적 검토
A Review of China's Maritime Boundary Line and Its Method of Delimitation in International Law Respective
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A comprehensive set of laws dealing with the seas known as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) entered into force on November 16, 1994. After the entry of force of UNCLOS, some issues on maritime delimitation(i.e., the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and the outer limit of Continental Shelf became a focal point for many countries. This also raises the issue of how to delimit overlapping zones and how to define the lines that will be the maritime boundary for the States concerned. People’s Republic of China (hereafter China) asserts that “it is unrealistic for countries to apply only one method of delimitation” when they seek to determine their maritime boundaries. Thus, the focal point of this study is the emphasis that it is very crucial for China how to applicate the maritime delimitation methods to its maritime space. In that respect, this study tries to scrutinize China’s laws and practice regarding its maritime boundary delimitation, especially focusing on the Chinese (broken) U-shaped line, natural prolongation of land territory, and equidistance approach (isometric latitude or equitable latitude). The (broken) U-shaped line as the traditional Chinese maritime boundary in the South China Sea and the method of straight baseline to all the coasts of China are controversial in international law so that they may be queried whether China’s practice conforms with the relevant provisions of UNCLOS. Further, regionally China has to negotiate with its neighboring countries on the maritime boundary delimitation of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf. In staking out their respective unilateral claims, China applied the principle of natural prolongation of land territory where its maritime boundaries should reflect the natural prolongation of its land territory to the outer limit. In the course of negotiations, the States concerned may apply any one or a combination of delimitation methods appropriate for arriving at an equitable solution between adjacent or opposite countries. In conclusion, while this study addresses international legal aspects of maritime delimitation method of China, it seeks together to assess what it takes to be ‘equitable solution’ to China on maritime boundary delimitation. It is especially so that the application in the East Asian region will be both a testing ground and a show case of China’s vision of “shelving disputes to engage in joint development with regard to contentious territories”.
Abstract
A comprehensive set of laws dealing with the seas known as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) entered into force on November 16, 1994. After the entry of force of UNCLOS, some issues on maritime delimitation(i.e., the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and the outer limit of Continental Shelf became a focal point for many countries. This also raises the issue of how to delimit overlapping zones and how to define the lines that will be the maritime boundary for the States concerned. People’s Republic of China (hereafter China) asserts that “it is unrealistic for countries to apply only one method of delimitation” when they seek to determine their maritime boundaries. Thus, the focal point of this study is the emphasis that it is very crucial for China how to applicate the maritime delimitation methods to its maritime space. In that respect, this study tries to scrutinize China’s laws and practice regarding its maritime boundary delimitation, especially focusing on the Chinese (broken) U-shaped line, natural prolongation of land territory, and equidistance approach (isometric latitude or equitable latitude). The (broken) U-shaped line as the traditional Chinese maritime boundary in the South China Sea and the method of straight baseline to all the coasts of China are controversial in international law so that they may be queried whether China’s practice conforms with the relevant provisions of UNCLOS. Further, regionally China has to negotiate with its neighboring countries on the maritime boundary delimitation of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf. In staking out their respective unilateral claims, China applied the principle of natural prolongation of land territory where its maritime boundaries should reflect the natural prolongation of its land territory to the outer limit. In the course of negotiations, the States concerned may apply any one or a combination of delimitation methods appropriate for arriving at an equitable solution between adjacent or opposite countries. In conclusion, while this study addresses international legal aspects of maritime delimitation method of China, it seeks together to assess what it takes to be ‘equitable solution’ to China on maritime boundary delimitation. It is especially so that the application in the East Asian region will be both a testing ground and a show case of China’s vision of “shelving disputes to engage in joint development with regard to contentious territories”.
참고문헌 (51)
- 권문상, "북극해의 분쟁과 해양경계획정에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1989
- 김대순, "국제법론, 제13판" (2003), 삼영사
- 김영구, "신판 한국과 바다의 국제법" (2004), 21세기북스
- 김용환, "골든로즈호-진셩호 해상충돌사건의 국제법상 쟁점", 해양정책연구, 22(2), pp.159~190 (2007), 한국해양수산개발원
- 김용환, "남중국해 영유권 분쟁의 끝은 어디인가", 독도연구저널, (2) (2008), 한국해양수산개발원 독도연구센터
- 김정건, "신판 국제법" (2004), 박영사
- 김찬규, "이른바 역사적 만에 관한 연구", 학술원논문집, 12 (1973), 대한민국학술원
- 김찬규, "중국의 영해법과 기선", 경희법학, 31(1) (1996)
- 김현수, "국제해양법" (2007), 연경문화사
- 해양법협약과 우리나라 해양관련법 개정방안, "문준조", ~ (1995)
- 백진현, "해양경계획정의 변천과 한반도 주변해역의 경계문제", 해양정책연구, 6(1) (1991)
- 이석용, "국제사법재판소의 도서영유권 및 해양경계획정 관련 분쟁해결", 국제법학회논총, 51(1)통권 : 104, pp.123~148 (2006), 대한국제법학회
- 이상면, "국가간 해양경계선의 획정에 관한 이론의 발전의 문제점", 계간석유, 60 (1994)
- 이용희, "역사적 만 제도와 중국 발해만의 역사적 지위에 관한 연구", 해사법연구, 17(1) (2005)
- 안상준, "한중일의 배타적경제수역경계획정에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2000
- 양희철, "해양경계획정에서 지질 및 지형적요소의 효과에 관한 고찰", Ocean and Polar Research, 29(1), pp.55~67 (2007), 한국해양연구원
- 장학봉, "중국의 해상경계설정과 우리나라에의 시사점", 월간 해양수산, 통권 : 272 (2007)
- 최진모, "중국-베트남간 통킹만 어업협정 및 해양경계협정 사례에 관한 소고", 해양정책연구, 21(1), pp.109~150 (2006), 한국해양수산개발원
- 王铁崖, "国际法" (2006), 法律出版社
- "新编 交通法" (2007), 法律出版社
- 孙湘平, "中国近海区域海洋" (2006), 海洋出版社
- 馬英久, "從新海洋法論魡魚臺列嶼與東海劃界問題" (1976), 中正書局
- 袁古洁, "國際海洋境界劃界的理論與實踐" (2001), 法律出版社
- 郭院, "海島法律制度比較硏究" (2006), 中國海洋大出版社
- 韩立民, "海域使用管理的理論與實踐" (2006), 中国海洋大学出版社
- 李耀臻, "海洋世紀與中國海洋發展戰略硏究" (2006), 中國海洋大出版社
- 曹丕富, "关于历史性权力与我国海域划界的研究, In 海洋国策研究文集" (2007), 海洋国策研究文集
- 张海文, "关于尽快公布我国第二批领海基线的建议, In 海洋国策研究文集" (2007), 海洋出版社
- 沈文周, "海洋劃界技述方法" (2003), 海洋出版社
- Charney,J.I., "Maritime Boundaries, Vol. I" (1993), Martinus Nijhoff
- Choon-ho Park, "East Asia and the Law of the Sea, 2nd ed." (1985), Seoul National University Press
- Evans, Malcolm, "The Law of the Sea, In International Law" (2003), Oxford University Press
- The Use and Abuse of Other “Relevant Rules of International Law” in treaty interpretation: Insights from WTO Trade, "Environment Litigation", Howse, Robert, 2007
- Hsu, R. T. S, "Rational Approach to Marine Delimitation", Ocean Development and International Law, 13, ~ (1983)
- Janis, Mark W, "An Introduction to International Law" (1999), Aspen & Business
- Kolb, Robert, "Case law on equitable maritime delimitation: digest and commentaries" (2003), The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
- McDougal, Myres S, "The Public Order of the Oceans: A Contemporary International Law of the Sea" (1987), New Haven Press
- O’Connell, D. P, "The International Law of the Sea, Vol. I" (1982), Oxford University Press
- O’Connell, D. P, "The International Law of the Sea, Vol. II" (1984), Oxford University Press
- Nordquist, Myron H, "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, In A Commentary, Vol. III" (1995), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
- Valencia, Mark J, "A Maritime Regime for North-East Asia" (1996), Oxford University Press
- "U.S. Department of State, Limits in the Sea, No. 106", ~ (1987)
- "Maritime Jurisdiction in the three China Seas: Options for Equitable Settlement"[URL]
- "A New Technique about Selecting Base Points of the Territorial Sea Based on the Principle of Convex Hull Creating"[URL]
- "동원측량컨설탄트 게시판 참조", ~
- 翁敏, "海上边界的划分技术方法研究", 第二届两岸测绘发展研讨会论文集 (2000)
- "从国际海洋法看 “U” 形线的法律地位”, 中国法学网 “学者专栏"[URL]
- "越南南沙政策析"[URL]
- "중화 인민공화국 방성항해사국(中華人民共和國防城港海事局) 홈페이지"[URL]