본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Dispute Settlement in Cross-Border Public-Private Partnerships with Diplomatic Agendas: Learning from the Kaesong Industrial Complex

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정치외교학

초록

This paper examines the ways in which administrative barriers and uncertainty surrounding the resolution of a dispute have obstructed the Kaesong Industrial Complex (“KIC”) from reaching its potential, not only as a unique form of public-private partnership, but also as a diplomatic gesture of progressive good faith. To help wind back some of these hindrances, this paper suggests that introducing an independent, international forum and standardized rules for dispute settlement is necessary. This mechanism would have to be sensitive to two objectives in relation to the KIC, the first is that of being able to ensure the continued operation of the facility in the instance of a conflict due to the high actual, opportunity, and diplomatic costs of a shutdown. The second objective that this dispute settlement mechanism must fulfill is to resolve disputes with minimized hostility. Given the exogenous nature of disruptions to the KIC’s operations, inciting greater tension via this mechanism would be self-defeating. This paper proposes the use of the Energy Charter Treaty and its Secretariat for the resolution of disputes in responding to these two objectives.

Abstract

This paper examines the ways in which administrative barriers and uncertainty surrounding the resolution of a dispute have obstructed the Kaesong Industrial Complex (“KIC”) from reaching its potential, not only as a unique form of public-private partnership, but also as a diplomatic gesture of progressive good faith. To help wind back some of these hindrances, this paper suggests that introducing an independent, international forum and standardized rules for dispute settlement is necessary. This mechanism would have to be sensitive to two objectives in relation to the KIC, the first is that of being able to ensure the continued operation of the facility in the instance of a conflict due to the high actual, opportunity, and diplomatic costs of a shutdown. The second objective that this dispute settlement mechanism must fulfill is to resolve disputes with minimized hostility. Given the exogenous nature of disruptions to the KIC’s operations, inciting greater tension via this mechanism would be self-defeating. This paper proposes the use of the Energy Charter Treaty and its Secretariat for the resolution of disputes in responding to these two objectives.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "The Kaesong Opportunity" (2013)[URL]
  2. "Tours to Mt. Kumgang Should be Resumed" (2012)[URL]
  3. Delmon, Jeffrey, "Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure: Project Finance, PPP Projects, and Risk" (2009), Kluwer Law International
  4. "The Energy Charter Treaty (with Incorporated Trade Amendment) and Related Documents" (2014)[URL]
  5. "Are North and South Korea Back in Business?" (2013)[URL]
  6. "Kaesong Industrial Complex" (2015)[URL]
  7. 10 Year Assessment of and Development Proposal for Operating the Kaesong Industrial Complex, "Hyundai Research Institute", ~, pp.VIP Report 14-44 (Issue 595) (2014)
  8. "A Rundown of the Kaesong Industrial Complex" (2013)[URL]
  9. Kim, Ho Cheol, "Does Annex 22-B of the Proposed United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement Contemplate and Allow for Trade with Respect to North Korea", GEO. J. INT’L L, 40(67), pp.72~76 (2008)
  10. "German Firm to Open Sales Office Inside North Korean Complex" (2014)[URL]
  11. Lee, Pierce, "Rules of Origin and the Kaesong Industrial Complex: South Korea’s Uphill Battle against the Principle of Territoriality", N.C. J. INTL’L L. & COM. REG, 39, pp.1~ (2013)
  12. "White Paper on Korean Unification 2014 (in Korean)"[URL]
  13. "The Kaesong North-South Korean Industrial Complex. CON. RESEARCH SERV., RL 34093" (2011)[URL]
  14. ROK, Ministry of Unification, "Laws and Regulations for the Gaesong Industrial Complex", ~ (2015)
  15. "S. Korean Auto Tycoon Drives Cattle to North" (1998)[URL]
  16. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, "UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Privately Financed Infrastructure Projects", United Nations, ~ (2000)
  17. "“2.2.1. Basic features of PPP models” A Primer to Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development" (2008)[URL]
  18. "PPPs Short Stories Competition" (2015)[URL]
  19. "Public-Private Partnerships Reference Guide" (2014)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)